Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 33 Issue 7
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
HOU Tian-shun, XU Guang-li. Optimum water content models and tests of lightweight soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(7): 1129-1134.
Citation: HOU Tian-shun, XU Guang-li. Optimum water content models and tests of lightweight soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(7): 1129-1134.
shu

Optimum water content models and tests of lightweight soil

  • (1. Key Lab of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

More Information
  • Received Date: April 11, 2010
  • Published Date: July 14, 2011
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • To determine the optimum water content of light weight soil with different mixture proportions, three kinds of models for the optimum water content are put forward: ρd–w model, qu–w model and RS-w model. It is supposed that three models can be expressed as a uniform downward opening parabola function. Analytic expressions for the optimum water content are theoretically derived. To test the above three models and to determine model coefficients, physical mechanical properties of light weight soil are studied by laboratory tests. The results show that the dry density, unconfined compressive strength and specific strength first increase and then decrease with the increase of water content, each of them has an optimum water content, and their curve shapes are similar to parabola. The measured data are analyzed based on the three models, the optimum water content calculated by models are very close to that obtained directly by the graphic method. By use of the precursors’ research achievements, the corresponding optimum water contents of qu–w model and RS-w model are almost the same, but they are slightly different from the corresponding optimum water content of ρd–w model. The optimum water contents of the three models are essentially the same. The optimum water content of light weight soil is the sum of physical and chemical water demand, it is an external appearance of water demand of complex physical and chemical reactions, and it is a theoretical basis for the three models to be unified. Taking RS–w model for an example, the water demand rate of mass of different components are calculated, and the results are closely related to properties of materials.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (15)
  • [1]
    黄 英, 符必昌. 确定土的最大干密度和最优含水率的数解法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002,24 (4): 538–540. (HUANG Ying, FU Bi-chang. Thenumerical solutions of maximum dry density and optimum water content of soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002,24 (4): 538–540. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    JESMANI M, MANESH A N,HOSEINI S M R. Optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight of clayey gravels at different compactive efforts[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 13L.
    [3]
    BLOTZ L R, BENSON C H,BOUTWELL G P. Estimating optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight forcompacted clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1998,124 (9): 907–912.
    [4]
    BARDEN L.Consolidation of clays compacted ‘dry’ and ‘wet’ of optimum water content[J].Geotechnique, 1974,24 (4): 605–625.
    [5]
    张志权, 王志勇. 最大干密度和最优含水率的准确性探讨[J]. 长安大学学报, 2004,21 (2):7–10. (ZHANG Zhi-quan, WANG Zhi-yong. Discussion on precision of biggest dry density and optimum water content[J]. Journal of Chang’an University, 2004,21 (2): 7–10. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    董金梅. 聚苯乙烯轻质混合土工程特性的试验研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2005. (DONG Jin-mei. Study onthe engineering characteristic of light heterogeneous soil mixed expanded polystyrene[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    侯天顺, 徐光黎. 发泡颗粒混合轻量土三轴应力-应变-孔压特性试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009,22 (6):10–17. (HOU Tian-shun, XU Guang-li. Experiment on triaxial pore water pressure-stress-strain characteristics of foamed particle light weight soil[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009,22 (6): 10–17. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    王庶懋. 砂土与EPS颗粒混合的轻质土(LSES)动力特性的试验研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2007. (WANG Shu-mao. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of light weight sand-EPS beads soil(LSES)[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2007.(in Chinese))
    [9]
    马时冬. 聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料轻质填土(SLS)的特性[J].岩土力学,2001,22 (3): 245–248. (MA Shi-dong. The properties ofstabilized light soil(SLS) with expanded polystyrene[J]. Rock and SoilMechanics, 2001,22 (3): 245–248.(in Chinese))
    [10]
    KIKU H, OMINE K, KAWANO H,et al. Experimental study on static strength of light weight soil in Japan[C]//Proceeding of the International Workshop on Light Weight Geo-Materials(IW-LGM2002).Tokyo, 2002: 3–22.
    [11]
    顾欢达, 顾 熙, 申 燕, 等. 发泡颗粒轻质土材料的基本性质[J].苏州科技学院学报, 2003, 16 (4): 44–48. (GUHuan-da, GU Xi, SHEN Yan, et al. The fundamental properties of light soil mixed with foamed beads[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou, 2003,16 (4): 44–48. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    朱 伟, 李明东, 张春雷, 等. 砂土EPS颗粒混合轻质土的最优击实含水率[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009,31 (1): 21–25. (ZHU Wei, LI Ming-dong, ZHANG Chun-lei, et al. The optimum moisture content of sand EPS beads mixed light weight soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009,31 (1):21–25. (inChinese))
    [13]
    GB/T50123—1999土工试验方法标准[S]. 1999. (GB/T50123—1999 Standard for soil test method[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    李明东, 朱 伟, 张春雷. 软夹杂土体的击实模型[J].土木工程学报, 2009,42 (12):149–153. (LI Ming-dong, ZHU Wei, ZHANG Chun-lei. A compaction model of soft inclusion soils[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009,42 (12): 149–153. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    李亚杰, 方坤河. 建筑材料[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2009. (LI Ya-jie, FANG Kun-he. Building materials[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YING Sai, XIA Xiaozhou, WEN Tao, ZHOU Fengxi, CAO Yapeng, LI Guoyu, ZHANG Qing. Experimental study on freezing characteristic curve of soils based on nuclear magnetic resonance technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(7): 1437-1444. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230301
    [2]TAO Gaoliang, PENG Yinjie, CHEN Yin, XIAO Henglin, LUO Chenchen, ZHONG Chuheng, LEI Da. A new fast prediction method for relative permeability coefficient of unsaturated soils based on NMR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 470-479. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221426
    [3]WANG Enliang, LI Yuang, REN Zhifeng, JIANG Haiqiang, LIU Chengqian, ZOU Yiyun, DU Shilin. Microstructural change of improved dispersive soil based on scanning electron microscope and nuclear magnetic resonance technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(6): 1123-1132. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220331
    [4]LIU Qian-qian, CAI Guo-qing, HAN Bo-wen, QIN Yu-teng, LI Jian. Experimental study on pore structure and freezing characteristics of graded soils based on NMR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 178-182. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1032
    [5]TIAN Jia-li, WANG Hui-min, LIU Xing-xing, XIANG Lei, SHENG JIN-chang, LUO Yu-long, ZHAN Mei-li. Permeability characteristics of sandstone based on NMR-coupled real-time seepage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(9): 1671-1678. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202209012
    [6]MA Dong-dong, MA Qin-yong, HUANG Kun, ZHANG Rong-rong. Pore structure and dynamic mechanical properties of geopolymer cement soil based on nuclear magnetic resonance technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 572-578. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202103021
    [7]WANG Ying, LIU Jin, MA Xiao-fan, QI Chang-qing, LU Hong-ning. Immersion effect of polyurethane-reinforced sand based on NMR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(12): 2342-2349. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202012023
    [8]CHENG Hua, CHEN Han-qing, CAO Guang-yong, RONG Chuan-Xin, YAO Zhi-shu, CAI Hai-bing. Migration mechanism of capillary-film water in frozen soil and its experimental verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1790-1799. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202010003
    [9]DU Yang, Tang Li-yun, YANG Liu-jun, WANG Xin, BAI Miao-miao. Interface characteristics of frozen soil-structure thawing process based on nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 2316-2322. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912017
    [10]AN Ai-jun, LIAO Jing-yun. Modified mesostructure of Standard Gange Railway expansive soils of Mombasa- Nairobi based on nuclear magnetic resonance and scanning electron microscope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 152-156. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2031
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 宋德坤，刘乐乐，王栋. 南海北部天然气水合物赋存区沉积物渗透性敏感规律试验研究. 地学前缘. 2024(06): 405-414 .
    2. 王丹，饶运章，刘戈，石亮，张美道. 离子型稀土镁盐浸矿不同深度矿土孔隙结构演化规律. 稀土. 2023(05): 92-102 .
    3. 李品良，许强，刘佳良，何攀，纪续，陈婉琳，彭大雷. 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究. 岩土力学. 2023(S1): 504-512 .
    4. 陈瑞敏，简文彬，张小芳，方泽化. CSFG-FR协同作用改良淤泥固化土性能试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(04): 1020-1030 .
    5. 郭钟群，周可凡，金解放，周尖荣，尚白红. 流体理化特性对土体渗流规律影响研究进展. 有色金属科学与工程. 2022(04): 116-125 .
    6. 安鹏举，鲁莎，唐辉明，孙思璇，张子涵，缪明昊. 渗透作用下滑带细观结构演变特性. 地质科技通报. 2022(06): 169-179 .
    7. 张晓飞，陈新炜，严涛，张文伟，李守义. 基于裂缝冲刷试验的分散性土自愈性研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2022(06): 167-173+181 .
    8. 陈仁祥，伏慧平，宋勇，王太伟，高柏. 稀土浸矿区山体滑坡特征及成因. 江西建材. 2021(01): 183-185 .
    9. 李文英，杨洋，曹成，许增光. 化学淤堵作用下尾矿砂孔隙分布及渗透特性试验研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2021(03): 187-192 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1643) PDF downloads (677) Cited by(31)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return