复杂干扰下细小裂缝识别增强的改进YOLOv8-seg岩石质量RQD自动识别研究

    • 摘要: 基于地质岩芯取样调查结果计算岩石质量指标(RQD)从而评估坝址区域的断层、不连续面和裂缝分布情况,对于水利工程建设质量管理具有重要意义。然而,人工测量RQD耗时费力且自动化程度低。同时,由于受到拍摄光影、纹理色差和人工标识等复杂干扰,以及细小裂缝导致岩芯有效长度识别困难,限制了基于图像的RQD识别技术的精度和实用效果。针对上述问题,本文开展了复杂干扰下细小裂缝识别增强的改进YOLOv8-seg岩石质量RQD自动识别研究。该模型在YOLOv8-seg模型的基础上,引入轻量级的多语义空间和通道协同注意力模块SCSA,在拍摄环境及人工标识等复杂干扰影响下准确提取岩芯特征,并结合动态蛇形卷积提高模型对细小裂缝的识别能力,从而实现岩芯段的有效提取。进一步地,基于岩芯段图像分割结果实现RQD自动计算和编录。案例分析表明,相较于原始模型,改进模型在精确率P、召回率R、mAP50和mAP50:95分别提升了3.3%、2.2%、2.4%和1.9%,所提方法较手动计算更为高效,平均相对误差为1.21%,为RQD识别计算和岩体质量评价提供了更具鲁棒性和可靠性的技术方案。

       

      Abstract: Calculating the Rock Quality Index (RQD) based on the results of geological core sampling to evaluate the distribution of faults, discontinuities, and fractures in the dam site area is of great significance for quality management in water conservancy project construction. However, manual measurement of RQD is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and minimally automated. Additionally, the accuracy and practical effectiveness of image-based RQD recognition technology are limited due to complex interferences such as lighting and shadow effects, texture color differences, and manual markings, as well as the challenges in identifying the effective length of the core caused by small cracks. To address these issues, this paper conducts a study on improved RQD automatic identification using YOLOv8-seg with enhanced small crack recognition under complex interference. This model builds on the YOLOv8-seg framework and introduces a lightweight multi-semantic space and channel collaborative attention module, SCSA, to accurately extract core features despite the interference from shooting conditions and manual markings, while incorporating dynamic serpentine convolution to enhance the model's ability to detect small cracks, thereby achieving effective extraction of core sections. Furthermore, based on the image segmentation results of core sections, RQD is automatically calculated and recorded. Case analysis reveals that, compared to the original model, the improved model increases precision (P), recall (R), mAP50, and mAP50:95 by 3.3%, 2.2%, 2.4%, and 1.9% respectively. The proposed method is more efficient than manual calculations, achieving an average relative error of 1.21%, thus providing a more robust and reliable technical scheme for RQD recognition calculation and rock mass quality evaluation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回