于晨阳, 倪浩, 王敏, 庄恒, 姜哲元, 李颖臻, 徐杨, 李静文, 吴朝峰, 杜延军. 土-复合有机改性膨润土垂直屏障防渗性能的现场和室内试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241288
    引用本文: 于晨阳, 倪浩, 王敏, 庄恒, 姜哲元, 李颖臻, 徐杨, 李静文, 吴朝峰, 杜延军. 土-复合有机改性膨润土垂直屏障防渗性能的现场和室内试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241288
    Field Trial and Laboratory Study of Soil-Composite Organics-Amended Bentonite Vertical Barriers: Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241288
    Citation: Field Trial and Laboratory Study of Soil-Composite Organics-Amended Bentonite Vertical Barriers: Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241288

    土-复合有机改性膨润土垂直屏障防渗性能的现场和室内试验研究

    Field Trial and Laboratory Study of Soil-Composite Organics-Amended Bentonite Vertical Barriers: Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation

    • 摘要: 针对某有机化工污染场地,选取四甲基氯化铵(TMA)和羧甲基纤维素钠(CMC)复合改性膨润土,采用开挖-回填施工工艺建造了长10 m×宽0.6 m×深5 m的土-复合有机改性膨润土(STCMB)垂直阻隔屏障,同时也建造了同等规模的传统(未改性)土-膨润土(SCB)垂直阻隔屏障作为对照。通过现场微水试验和室内柔性壁渗透试验,对比分析了两类垂直阻隔屏障材料在现场和室内条件下获取的渗透系数。现场微水试验结果表明,STCMB屏障的渗透系数相较于SCB屏障降低了约38%,两者的渗透系数分别为8.1×10-11 m/s 和1.3×10-10 m/s。根据已有研究,这可能是由于TMA和CMC两者通过协同作用在膨润土颗粒间形成了三维凝胶网状结构,增加了渗透路径的曲折度,从而降低了渗透系数。室内柔性壁渗透试验结果表明,STCMB屏障在自来水和1000 mg/L苯酚溶液作用下的渗透系数分别为8.0×10-11 m/s和6.9×10-11 m/s,SCB屏障分别为1.4×10-10 m/s和1.6×10-10 m/s。两类屏障在自来水和1000 mg/L苯酚溶液作用下的渗透系数比值分别为1.159和0.875,表明两类屏障的渗透系数受苯酚溶液的影响较小,且屏障材料对苯酚溶液具有良好的化学相容性。此外,微水试验测试获取的渗透系数与室内柔性壁渗透试验结果相近,二者在测试尺度和测试参数可控方面具有互补性,有助于更全面地评估土-膨润土系垂直阻隔屏障的防渗性能。

       

      Abstract: This study employed a composite organics-amended bentonite in creating soil-bentonite backfills for the construction of a vertical barrier. The backfill consisted of in-situ clayey soil and bentonite amended with tetramethylammonium chloride (TMA) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), hereinafter referred to as STCMB. The vertical barrier was constructed using the excavation-backfill method, with dimensions of 10 m in length, 0.6 m in width, and 5 m in depth. For comparison, a conventional (unamended) soil-bentonite (SCB) vertical barrier with the same dimensions was also constructed. Field slug tests and laboratory flexible-wall hydraulic conductivity tests were conducted to evaluate and compare the hydraulic conductivity of the two types of vertical barrier materials under field and laboratory conditions. The results of field slug tests revealed that the hydraulic conductivity of STCMB was approximately 38% lower than that of SCB, with measured values of 8.1 × 10 -11 m/s and 1.3 × 10 -10 m/s, respectively. Based on previous study, this could be attributed to the synergistic interactions between TMA and CMC, which facilitated the formation of a three-dimensional hydrogel network structure among bentonite particles. This structural configuration enhanced the tortuosity of fluid transport pathway, thereby reducing the hydraulic conductivity. Flexible wall hydraulic conductivity test results showed that the hydraulic conductivities of STCMB were 8.0 × 10 -11 m/s in tap water and 6.9 × 10 -11 m/s in 1000 mg/L phenol solution. In contrast, the SCB exhibited higher hydraulic conductivities of 1.4 × 10 -10 m/s in tap water and 1.6 × 10 -10 m/s in 1000 mg/L phenol solution. The ratios of hydraulic conductivity in tap water to that in the phenol solution for STCMB and SCB were 1.159 and 0.875, respectively, indicating minimal impact of the phenol solution on hydraulic performance and demonstrating favorable chemical compatibility. Furthermore, the hydraulic conductivities obtained from the field slug tests closely aligned with those obtained from the flexible wall hydraulic conductivity tests. With respective advantages in test scale and parameter control, these two methods collectively facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity of soil-bentonite vertical barriers.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回