高紫阳, 王军, 高明伟, 朱萧霄, 符洪涛, 徐昭, 吕有畅. 上覆回填土的吹填淤泥地基反向真空预压法试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(7): 1545-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240159
    引用本文: 高紫阳, 王军, 高明伟, 朱萧霄, 符洪涛, 徐昭, 吕有畅. 上覆回填土的吹填淤泥地基反向真空预压法试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(7): 1545-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240159
    GAO Ziyang, WANG Jun, GAO Mingwei, ZHU Xiaoxiao, FU Hongtao, XU Zhao, LÜ Youchang. Reverse vacuum preloading method for overlying backfill soil of blown silt foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(7): 1545-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240159
    Citation: GAO Ziyang, WANG Jun, GAO Mingwei, ZHU Xiaoxiao, FU Hongtao, XU Zhao, LÜ Youchang. Reverse vacuum preloading method for overlying backfill soil of blown silt foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(7): 1545-1552. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240159

    上覆回填土的吹填淤泥地基反向真空预压法试验研究

    Reverse vacuum preloading method for overlying backfill soil of blown silt foundation

    • 摘要: 针对传统真空预压加固吹填淤泥地基时,深层土体加固效果不佳和真空压力沿程损失大等问题,提出了反向真空预压法,即采用反向排水板将真空压力直接施加于深层土体。通过室内模型试验,探究了回填土厚度对反向真空预压法加固效果的影响。结果表明:与传统真空预压法相比,反向真空预压法处理的排水量增加了16.46%,深层土体十字板剪切强度提高了20.50%,土体的整体加固效果得到显著改善;随着回填土厚度的增大,淤泥层十字板剪切强度沿深度方向递减的幅度明显减小,处理效果更加均匀。此外,通过与传统真空预压法现场对比试验发现,反向真空预压法处理后土体的表层沉降量增大15.70%,深层土体孔压消散量增加了26.20%,平均十字板剪切强度提高了21.12%。因此得出反向真空预压法是一种有效的地基处理方法,尤其深层土体加固效果更优。

       

      Abstract: A reverse vacuum preloading method is proposed to address the problems of poor reinforcement effects of deep soil and vacuum loss when the traditional vacuum preloading is used to treat silt foundation. This method uses a reverse drainage plate to apply vacuum pressure to the deep soil directly. The influences of backfill soil thickness on the reinforcement effects of reverse vacuum preloading method are studied through the indoor model experiments. Compared with the traditional vacuum preloading, the reverse vacuum preloading method increases the drainage volume by 16.46%, increases the vane shear strength of the deep soil by 20.50%, and significantly improves the overall reinforcement effects. With the increase of the backfill soil thickness, decreasing the rate of the vane shear strength in the silt layer along the depth direction is significantly reduced, and the treatment effects are more uniform. In addition, through on-site comparison between the reverse and traditional vacuum preloading methods, it is found that the surface settlement of the soil treated by the reverse vacuum preloading method increases by 15.70%, the dissipation of pore pressure in deep soil increases by 26.20%, and the average vane shear strength increases by 21.12%. Therefore, it is concluded that the reverse vacuum preloading method is an effective foundation treatment method, especially for deep soil reinforcement.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回