• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
WANG Lanmin, XU Shiyang, WANG Ping, WANG Rui, CHE Ailan, ZHOU Yanguo, WU Zhijian, WANG Qian, PU Xiaowu, CHAI Shaofeng, MA Xingyu. Characteristics and lessons of liquefaction-triggered large-scale flow slide in loess deposit during Jishishan M6.2 earthquake in 2023[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 235-243. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240038
Citation: WANG Lanmin, XU Shiyang, WANG Ping, WANG Rui, CHE Ailan, ZHOU Yanguo, WU Zhijian, WANG Qian, PU Xiaowu, CHAI Shaofeng, MA Xingyu. Characteristics and lessons of liquefaction-triggered large-scale flow slide in loess deposit during Jishishan M6.2 earthquake in 2023[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 235-243. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240038

Characteristics and lessons of liquefaction-triggered large-scale flow slide in loess deposit during Jishishan M6.2 earthquake in 2023

More Information
  • Received Date: January 11, 2024
  • Available Online: February 05, 2024
  • At 23:59 of December 18, 2023, a strong earthquake with a magnitude of M6.2 with a focal depth of 10 km struck Jishishan County in Gansu Province, China. The epicenter is located at N35.7° and E102.79°. A large-scale liquefaction-triggered flow slide in loess deposit on the secondary terrace with a gentle slope of 2°~3.5° of the Yellow River was induced by the earthquake, where is about 20 km away from the epicenter. The flow slide developed into a devastating mudflow to buried 51 houses in two villages of Jintian and Caotan, Qinghai Province and caused 20 people dead. A joint field investigation was carried out on the flow slide immediately after the earthquake. Based on the site reconnaissance, UAV survey, borehole exploration, electrical prospecting and analyses on both ground motion and the previous research achievements in liquefaction-triggered flow slides in loess deposit, the characteristics and mechanism of the large-scale flow slide are clarified preliminarily. The results show that the flow slide in loess deposit is triggered by the liquefaction in a large area of saturated loess layer below 11 m, the overburden soil mass slides into a gully with liquefied loess together along the liquefied layer in the direction of the gentle slope. And then, the mixture mass of soil and water continues moving down along the gully with a gradient of 1.5°~5°. During the flow sliding, stirring and rubbing each other continuously of the large amount of water gushes from the liquefied soil mass and the overburden soil has made its mixture to develop into a mud flow before the mixture arrives at a dam in the downstream of the gully. After meeting the dam, the mudflow overflows the banks at both sides, and at the same time, turns into the other neighbor gully at the left side for about a certain distance. Finally, the dam breaks and the mudflow moves down again along the gully, passes the two villages, and stops in a large area of farmland 317 m away from the villages. The lessons learned from the disaster are expounded for its risk assessment, mitigation and prevention.
  • [1]
    WANG L M, WU Z J, XIA K, et al. Amplification of thickness and topography of loess deposit on seismic ground motion and its seismic design methods[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 126: 105090. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.021
    [2]
    白铭学, 张苏民. 高烈度地震时黄土地层的液化移动[J]. 工程勘察, 1990, 18(6): 1-5.

    BAI Mingxue, ZHANG Sumin. Landslide induced by liquefaction of loessial soil during earthquake of high intensity[J]. Geotechnical Investigation and Surveying, 1990, 18(6): 1-5. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    王兰民. 黄土动力学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2003.

    WANG Lanmin. Loess Dynamics[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    WANG L M, ZHANG Z, LI L, et al. Laboratory study on loess liquefaction[C]// The Proceedings of Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Alcapulco, 1996.
    [5]
    王兰民. 黄土地层大规模地震液化滑移的机理与风险评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(1): 1-19. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202001001

    WANG Lanmin. Mechanism and risk evaluation of sliding flow triggered by liquefaction of loess deposit during earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 1-19. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202001001
    [6]
    赵晋泉, 张大卫, 高树义, 等. 1303年山西洪洞8级大地震郇堡地滑之研究[J]. 山西地震, 2003(3): 17-23.

    ZHAO Jinquan, ZHANG Dawei, GAO Shuyi, et al. Huanbu ground slide, the relic of 1303 Hongtong, Shanxi, earthquake of M8[J]. Earthquake Research in Shanxi, 2003(3): 17-23. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    王兰民, 柴少峰, 薄景山, 等. 黄土地震滑坡的触发类型、特征与成灾机制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(8): 1543-1554. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220531

    WANG Lanmin, CHAI Shaofeng, BO Jingshan, et al. Triggering types, characteristics and disaster mechanism of seismic loess landslides[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1543-1554. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220531
    [8]
    ISHIHARA K, OKUSA S, OYAGI N, et al. Liquefaction-induced flow slide in the collapsible loess deposit in soviet Tajik[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1990, 30(4): 73-89. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.30.4_73
    [9]
    王钟琦, 谢君斐, 石兆吉. 地震工程地质导论[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1983.

    WANG Zhongqi, XIE Junfei, SHI Zhaoji. Introduction to Earthquake Engineering Geology[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1983. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    陈文化. 地震液化流滑震害[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2001, 10(4): 88-93.

    CHEN Wenhua. Slipping disaster induced by seismic liquefaction[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2001, 10(4): 88-93. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    ZHANG J M, WANG G. Large post-liquefaction deformation of sand, part Ⅰ: physical mechanism, constitutive description and numerical algorithm[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2012, 7(2): 69-113.
    [12]
    张建民. 砂土动力学若干基本理论探究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(1): 1-50. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/14487

    ZHANG Jianmin. New advances in basic theories of sand dynamics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engeering, 2012, 34(1): 1-50. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/14487
  • Related Articles

    [1]YU Yan-yan, DING Hai-ping, LIU Qi-fang. Effects of impedance ratio between basin sediment and surrounding rock on seismic ground motions and basin-induced Rayleigh waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 667-677. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202004009
    [2]LI Rui-shan, YUAN Xiao-ming. Theoretical solution of site amplification coefficient[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(6): 1066-1073. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201906010
    [3]CHEN Guo-xing, LIU Xue-ning, ZHU Jiao, JIN Dan-dan, XU Han-gang. Spatial variation of predominant periods of site and amplifications of peak ground accelerations for deep sediment layers: case study of Suzhou City[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(6): 996-1004. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201906002
    [4]GAO Yu-feng. Analytical models and amplification effects of seismic wave propagation in canyon sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1): 1-25. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201901001
    [5]ZHOU Yan-guo, TAN Xiao-ming, CHEN Jie, PEI Xiang-jun, CHEN Yun-min. Observations and analyses of site amplification effects of deep liquefiable soil deposits by geotechnical downhole array[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1282-1291. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707015
    [6]JIANG Zhi-jun, HU Jin-jun, ZHANG Qi, XIE Li-li. Site amplification factor model for Sichuan region considering nonlinear soil effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1650-1659. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201609012
    [7]LI Ping, BO Jing-shan, LI Xiao-bo, XIAO Rui-jie. Amplification effect of soil sites on ground motion in Anning River valley and Qionghai Lake area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 362-369. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602022
    [8]ZHU Jiao, CHEN Guo-xing, XU Han-gang. Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 2079-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201511020
    [9]CHEN Guoxing, ZHUANG Haiyang, XU Ye. A study on influence of excavated shallow tunnel on design parameters of ground motion in the soft site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, 26(6): 739-744.
    [10]GAO Guangyun, YUE Zhongqi, Tham L. G., QIU Chang. Theoretical analysis of unusual vibration amplification in barrier protected zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(5): 565-568.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 王秀琴,牛全福,王浩,程西安,李克恭,牛虎林. 甘肃积石山M_s6.2级地震区滑坡危险性评价与区划. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2025(01): 169-181 .
    2. 韩颜颜,臧阳,马亚伟,解孟雨,王月,杨文,张小涛,宋金,姜祥华,史海霞,李飞,孟令媛. 2023年震情述评. 中国地震. 2024(01): 271-278 .
    3. 蒲诚,刘关张,黄华,魏康康,孙海涛. 积石山地震对大河家水电站右岸砂砾石副坝震害影响分析. 西北水电. 2024(03): 81-88 .
    4. 岳峰,董建华,董鹏飞,范国涛,张虎. 甘肃积石山M_S6.2地震高烈度区震害特征及机理分析. 地震工程学报. 2024(04): 759-767 .
    5. 石玉成,高晓明,景天孝. 甘肃积石山6.2级地震应急处置及灾后重建对策. 地震工程学报. 2024(04): 751-758 .
    6. 孙杲辰,陈涛,代建波,朱熹育,兰官奇,刘玉屏,李龙,霍俞帆. 12·18甘肃积石山地震诱发泥石流地质灾害成因及建筑物破坏特征分析. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2024(04): 134-139 .
    7. 赵宽耀,许强,陈婉琳,彭大雷,高登辉. 黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究. 岩土力学. 2024(09): 2754-2764 .
    8. 刘欢,樊晓一,夏贵平,姜元俊,宋嘉麒,邓鑫. 积石山地震触发中川乡液化滑坡—泥流及建筑损毁特征. 山地学报. 2024(04): 546-556 .
    9. 石高扬,薛志航,谢强,刘凡. 甘肃积石山6.2级地震750 kV避雷器震害统计及损伤机理分析. 高电压技术. 2024(11): 5005-5013 .
    10. 王乃昂,李小强,叶豪,赵力强,赵晓阳,鲁荣珠,王宇晨. 甘肃积石山M_S6.2级地震同震高速泥流研究. 地理科学. 2024(11): 2015-2028 .
    11. 魏学利,陈其鹏,焦友金,午洋泽,许瀚文,向翻,石兴武. 季节冻土区黄土滑坡形成机理研究——以新疆伊犁加朗普特滑坡群为例. 冰川冻土. 2024(06): 1871-1882 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (816) PDF downloads (314) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return