• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHU Jiao, CHEN Guo-xing, XU Han-gang. Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 2079-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201511020
Citation: ZHU Jiao, CHEN Guo-xing, XU Han-gang. Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 2079-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201511020

Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site

More Information
  • Received Date: September 07, 2014
  • Published Date: November 19, 2015
  • The seismic bedrock interface depth has great influence on design ground motion parameters. Based on the borehole profiles in the downtown area of Suzhou City, nine interfaces of soil layers, whose shear wave velocities range from 400 to 800 m/s, are selected as the seismic bedrock interfaces. The equivalent linear method is used to describe the nonlinear characteristics of soil, and the effects of seismic bedrock interface depth on site surface motion are analyzed on the basis of the one-dimensional wave propagation model. The results show that: (1) The peak ground acceleration (PGA) increases as the shear wave velocity of seismic bedrock interface grows, but the PGA increasing range decreases as the input motion PGA increases; (2) The values of ground motion acceleration response amplification factorspectrum become larger with the increase of the shear wave velocity of seismic bedrock interfaces, and thevalues become smaller with the increase of input motion PGA. Under near-field ground motion of moderate strong earthquake, the depth of seismic bedrock interface has significant influence on thevalues for the period less than 1.0 s. But under far-field ground motion of great earthquake, the depth of seismic bedrock interface has significant influence on thevalues for the period less than 4.0 s; (3) Thevalues under far-field ground motion are obviously higher than those under near-field ground motion; (4) It is appropriate to choose the interface of soil with shear velocity not less than 700 m/s as the seismic bedrock interface.
  • [1]
    AKI K. Local site effects on weak and strong ground motion[J]. Tectonophysics, 1993, 218(1): 93-111.
    [2]
    LANZO G, SILVESTRI F, COSTANZO A, et al. Site response studies and seismic microzoning in the middle Aterno valley (L’Aquila, Central Italy)[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(5): 1417-1442.
    [3]
    KHAM M, SEMBLAT J F, BOUDEN-ROMDHANE N. Amplification of seismic ground motion in the Tunis basin: numerical BEM simulations vs experimental evidences[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 155: 80-86.
    [4]
    MITTAL H, KUMAR A, SINGH S K. Estimation of site effects in Delhi using standard spectral ratio[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 50: 53-61.
    [5]
    DIMITRIU P, KALOGERAS I, THEODULIDIS N. Evidence of nonlinear site response in horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio from near-field earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999, 18(6): 423-435.
    [6]
    DI FIORE V. Seismic site amplification induced by topographic irregularity: results of a numerical analysis on 2D synthetic models[J]. Engineering Geology, 2010, 114(3): 109-115.
    [7]
    CHEN G, JIN D, ZHU J, et al. Nonlinear analysis on seismic site response of Fuzhou Basin, China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American, 2015, 105(2A): 928-949.
    [8]
    ASCE 4-98 Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary[S]. 1998.
    [9]
    ASCE/SEI 43-05 Seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components in nuclear facilities[S]. 2005.
    [10]
    NUREG-0800 standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, revision 3[S]. 2007.
    [11]
    Westinghouse Electric Company. AP1000 design control document, revision 17[R]. Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Company, 2009.
    [12]
    战吉艳, 陈国兴, 杨伟林, 等. 苏州第四纪沉积土动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(3): 559-566. (ZHAN Ji-yan, CHEN Guo-xing, YANG Wei-lin, et al. Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of Suzhou quaternary sedimentary soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 559-566. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    EPRI.TR-102293 Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions[S]. 1993.

Catalog

    Article views (457) PDF downloads (549) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return