Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 41 Issue 1
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
ZHUANG Hai-yang, REN Jia-wei, WANG Rui, MIAO Yu, CHEN Guo-xing. Elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with two layers and three spans[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201901014
Citation: ZHUANG Hai-yang, REN Jia-wei, WANG Rui, MIAO Yu, CHEN Guo-xing. Elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with two layers and three spans[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1): 131-138. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201901014
shu

Elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with two layers and three spans

  • 1.Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China;
    2.School of Civil Engineering & Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;

More Information
  • Received Date: November 26, 2017
  • Published Date: January 24, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The seismic performance of subway underground station has not been understood enough. According to the rules in the seismic codes of China, different stiffness ratios of underground structure to the surrounding soil foundation are designed. Considering the effects of the input earthquake waves, the elasto-plastic working states and seismic performance levels of a frame-type subway underground station are studied. Firstly, it is proved that the limit interlayer displacement angles of the subway underground station in the elastic or elasto-plastic working states are smaller than those of ground reinforced concrete frame structure. At the same time, the difference between the limit interlayer displacement angles of subway underground station is also smaller than that of ground reinforced concrete frame structure, which proves that the seismic performance of subway underground station is worse than that of ground reinforced concrete frame structure. According to the relationships among the interlayer displacement angles, the peak accelerations of the input ground motion and the stiffness ratios of structure to the nearby soil foundation, some empirical formulas are given to calculate the interlayer displacement angles of subway underground station. Finally, according to the relationship between the earthquake damage states and the interlayer displacement angles, the seismic performance of subway underground stations are divided into five levels and described.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    ASCE. Earthquake damage evaluation and design considerations for underground structures[M]. Los Angeles: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1974.
    [2]
    JSCE. Earthquake resistant design for civil engineering structures in Japan[M]. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1992.
    [3]
    SHARMA S, JUDD W R.Underground opening damage from earthquakes[J]. Engineering Geology, 1991, 30(3/4): 263-276.
    [4]
    HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293.
    [5]
    KONTOGIANNI V A, STIROS S C.Earthquakes and seismic faulting: effects on tunnels[J]. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 2003, 12(1): 153-156.
    [6]
    ANDERSON J G, BODIN P, BRUNE J N, et al.Strong ground motion from the Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake[J]. Science, 1986, 233(4768): 1043-1049.
    [7]
    SINGH S K, MENA E, CASTRO R.Some aspects of source characteristics of the 19 September 1985 Michoacan earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78(2): 451-477.
    [8]
    林刚, 罗世培, 倪娟. 地铁结构地震破坏及处理措施[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2009, 46(4): 36-41.
    (LIN Gang, LUO Shi-pei, NI Juan.Damages of metro structures due to earthquake and corresponding treatment measures[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2009, 46(4): 36-41. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    YOSHIDA N, NAKAMURA S.Damage to Daikai subway station during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nunbu earthquake and its investigation[C]// Proceedings of Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paris, 1996: 283-300.
    [10]
    ZHUANG Hai-yang, HU Zhong-hua, CHEN Guo-xing.Numerical modeling on the seismic responses of a large underground structure in soft ground[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2015, 17(2): 802-815.
    [11]
    庄海洋. 土–地下结构非线性动力相互作用及其大型振动台试验研究[D]. 南京: 南京工业大学, 2006.
    (ZHUANG Hai-yang.Study on nonlinear dynamic soil-underground structure interaction and its large-size shaking table test[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Tech University, 2006. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    李积栋, 陶连金, 油新华, 等. 超大型Y形柱地铁车站振动台试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(10): 2027-2032.
    (LI Ji-dong, TAO Lian-jin, YOU Xin-hua, et al.Research on shaking table test of ultra-large subway station with Y-shape column[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(10): 2027-2032. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    刘晶波, 王文晖, 赵冬冬, 等. 复杂断面地下结构地震反应分析的整体式反应位移法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(1): 134-142.
    (LIU Jing-bo, WANG Wen-hui, ZHAO Dong-dong, et al.Integral response deformation method in seismic analysis of complex section underground structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(1): 134-142. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    庄海洋, 王雪剑, 王瑞, 等. 土-地铁地下结构动力相互作用体系侧向变形特征研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(10): 1761-1769.
    (ZHUANG Hai-yang, WANG Xue-jian, WANG Rui, et al.Lateral deformation characteristics of the soil-subway underground structure dynamic interaction system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1761-1769. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    LEE J, FENVES G L.Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998(4): 892-900.
    [16]
    楼梦麟, 王文剑, 朱彤. 土–结构体系振动台模型试验中土层边界影响问题[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(2): 30-36.
    (LOU Meng-lin, WANG Wen-jian, ZHU Tong.Soil lateral boundary effect in shaking table model test of soil-structure system[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2000, 20(2): 30-36. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    BS 5975:2008 + A1 2011, Code of practice for temporary works procedures and the permissible stress design of false work[S]. 2011.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Multi-index and thresholds for seismic performance evaluation of prefabricated subway station structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240829
    [2]LI Xiancheng, ZHOU Hang, QI Geping. Elasto-plastic variational solution for vertically loaded noncylindrical piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(1): 122-133. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20211472
    [3]ZHANG Le, DANG Fa-ning, WANG Xu, DING Jiu-long, GAO Jun. Calculation and analysis of earth pressure under limited displacement considering influences of internal friction angle[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S1): 81-86. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S1015
    [4]YANG Jing, YUN Long, ZHUANG Hai-yang, REN Jia-wei, CHEN Wen-bin. Seismic performance levels of frame-type subway underground station with three layers and three spans[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(12): 2240-2248. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202012010
    [5]LÜ Bu, YANG Zhi-jun, WEI Xiu-dong, LU Ji-zhong, FU Xu-dong. Failure modes and constitutive model for weak interlayer of dam foundation with different inclination angles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 189-192. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S1048
    [6]ZHAO Yi, ZHOU Xiao-ping, QIAN Qi-hu. Elastoplastic analysis of surrounding rock masses around tunnels using general particle dynamics method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 1104-1116. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201606018
    [7]CHEN Xing-zhou, LI Jian-lin, CHAI Jun-rui, BAI Jun-guang. Shear creep characteristics and constitutive model for interlayer shear belt of high abutment slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1675-1682.
    [8]WANG Guo-bo, XIE Wei-ping, SUN Ming, LIU Wei-guo. Evaluation method for seismic behaviors of underground frame structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 593.
    [9]QU Chengzhong, XIE Lili. Numerical solution of displacement on performance point[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(10): 1159-1161.
    [10]Zhang Lianghui, Xiong Houjin, Zhang Qing. Analytical Solution for Displacements of Elasto Viscoplastic Ground Around Tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(4): 66-72.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(33)

    1. 张鑫磊，纪展鹏，黄凯，王志华，高洪梅，胡正阳. 可液化土体中浅埋管廊上浮机制和抗浮措施研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(02): 510-520 .
    2. 石卫，王瑞，王启耀. 地下结构抗震设计反应位移法的研究综述. 科学技术与工程. 2024(01): 61-71 .
    3. 侯本伟，游丹，范世杰，许成顺，钟紫蓝. 基于网络效率的城市轨道交通网络抗震韧性评估. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 509-519 .
    4. 王国波，王鸿杰，王建宁，金立国，赵丁凤. 基于耐震时程法的地下结构序列地震作用抗震性能研究. 振动与冲击. 2024(15): 261-268+276 .
    5. 李维沈，李文婷，徐昊哲. 地下结构抗震性能指标限值的影响因素研究. 自然灾害学报. 2024(06): 178-191 .
    6. 蒋家卫，许成顺，杜修力，陈国兴，许紫刚. 浅埋地铁车站地下框架结构抗震设计的最优地震动强度指标. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 318-326 . 本站查看
    7. 苗晗，蒋录珍，安军海，李莎，马晓明. 叠合装配式管廊结构抗震性能水平与评价方法研究. 震灾防御技术. 2023(01): 53-64 .
    8. 樊一凡，陈之毅. 基于优化选点的土层剪切波速随机性对地铁车站结构抗震性能的影响研究. 土木工程学报. 2023(08): 174-183 .
    9. 钟紫蓝，冯立倩，史跃波，温卫平，赵密. 序列型地震作用下地铁车站损伤分析. 岩土工程学报. 2023(08): 1586-1594 . 本站查看
    10. 白立广. 地下双层车站盖挖段主体结构施工技术. 建筑机械. 2023(08): 63-67 .
    11. 王伟，刘英，庄海洋，赵凯，陈国兴. 考虑内部结构的大直径盾构隧道抗震性能. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治. 2023(03): 78-85 .
    12. 赵畅，于旭，庄海洋，单志承，吴晓飞. 考虑SSI效应的基础隔震框架结构抗震性态水平分析. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(05): 1024-1034 .
    13. 邱大鹏，陈健云，王文明，曹翔宇. 考虑竖向地震作用的大型地下框架结构易损性分析. 岩土工程学报. 2023(12): 2537-2546 . 本站查看
    14. 游裕鑫，邵国建，李昂，刘旭. 异跨框架式地铁地下车站结构三维非线性地震响应分析. 河南科学. 2022(04): 610-617 .
    15. 罗永鸿，张梓鸿，许成顺，李洋. 基于Pushover分析方法的多层地铁车站地震反应研究. 震灾防御技术. 2022(01): 143-153 .
    16. 孟啸，李宏远，石少华. 超大型地下交通枢纽结构关键断面抗震性能分析. 建筑结构. 2022(S1): 820-825 .
    17. 张椿民. 地下多层地铁车站结构抗震设计对比分析. 市政技术. 2022(12): 50-58 .
    18. 范世杰，游丹，侯本伟，许成顺. 基于网络效率的城市轨道交通网络震后性能评估. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(06): 1165-1173+1190 .
    19. 殷琳，舒恩，楼梦麟，蔡海兵. 地下结构地震反应的平面计算模型研究. 震灾防御技术. 2022(04): 727-734 .
    20. 张季，蒋玮，谭灿星，许紫刚，唐柏赞，庄海洋. SV波斜入射时地铁车站-土-邻近地表框架结构动力相互作用分析. 震灾防御技术. 2022(04): 622-631 .
    21. 李文婷，李维沈，陈春霞，徐昊哲. 地下结构抗震性能及指标体系研究综述. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 754-758 .
    22. 王国波，刘强，王鸿杰，王建宁，董正方. 震后地下结构在火灾下的力学性能初步分析. 岩土工程学报. 2022(S2): 30-35 . 本站查看
    23. 王瑞，胡志平，任翔，李芳涛，温馨. 2.5D有限元建模关键问题——边界条件、网格划分及计算域选取. 振动工程学报. 2021(01): 80-88 .
    24. 王程，汤鹏，庄海洋，杨明. 考虑错缝拼装的过江大直径管廊盾构隧道抗震性能研究. 自然灾害学报. 2021(01): 116-123 .
    25. 许紫刚，许成顺，杜修力，吴晔. 基于拟静力推覆分析的大开车站和区间隧道地震损伤研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(07): 1182-1191+1373 . 本站查看
    26. 丁录董，徐军林，庄海洋，陈文斌. 预制+现浇装配式地铁地下车站结构地震反应的三维有限元分析. 世界地震工程. 2021(04): 157-166 .
    27. 左红伟，马甲宽，任翔，白兰，喻畅. 双连拱地铁隧道衬砌结构地震动力响应特征. 科学技术与工程. 2021(30): 13139-13147 .
    28. 周兵，江中华. 地下车站结构安全状态综合评价模型与应用. 现代隧道技术. 2021(S1): 1-10 .
    29. 朱雯蕾，李宁. 青岛地铁某地下车站结构抗震数值模拟计算分析. 现代城市轨道交通. 2020(01): 65-72 .
    30. 钟紫蓝，申轶尧，甄立斌，张成明，赵密，杜修力. 地震动强度参数与地铁车站结构动力响应指标分析. 岩土工程学报. 2020(03): 486-494 . 本站查看
    31. 王建宁，马国伟，窦远明，庄海洋，付继赛. 异跨框架式地铁地下车站结构抗震性能水平与评价方法研究. 振动与冲击. 2020(10): 92-100 .
    32. 杨靖，云龙，庄海洋，任佳伟，陈文斌. 三层三跨框架式地铁地下车站结构抗震性能水平研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(12): 2240-2248 . 本站查看
    33. 马超，王作虎，路德春，杜修力. CFRP加固地铁车站结构中柱地震损伤评价研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(12): 2249-2256 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(24)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (319) PDF downloads (214) Cited by(57)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return