Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 40 Issue 9
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
HUANG Da, ZHANG Xiao-jing, GU Dong-ming. Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(9): 1601-1609. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201809005
Citation: HUANG Da, ZHANG Xiao-jing, GU Dong-ming. Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(9): 1601-1609. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201809005
shu

Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode

  • 1. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction in Mountainous Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 11, 2017
  • Published Date: September 24, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The geological structure and mechanical properties of locking section are the key control factors to the rock slope with three-section landslide mode. According to the characteristics of the geological structure of three-section landslide, physical model tests and particle flow numerical simulation method were used to study the influences of the angle of rock bridge of locking section (the angle between the line of the end of the tensile crack to the end of the creep section and the horizontal direction) on the failure mode and failure evolution of locking section in the rock slope with three-section landslide mode. The failure modes of the locking section can be summarized as tensile coalescence and mixed tensile-shear coalescence. With the increase of the angle of rock bridge of the locking section, the failure mode is changed from the tensile coalescence to the mixed tensile-shear one. When the angle is less than 90°, the failure of slope is caused by the tensile coalescence. When the angle is between 90°and 110°, the failure of slope is caused by the mixed tensile-shear coalescence. When the angle is greater than 110°, the failure occurs in other areas instead of the locking section. Based on the analysis of the strain-time curve of locking section, the tensile zone of the locking section decreases gradually with the increase of the angle of the rock bridge of the locking section, and its stress state is changed from the whole tension to the whole compression.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (20)
  • [1]
    黄润秋. 岩石高边坡发育的动力过程及其稳定性控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(8): 1525-1544.
    (HUANG Run-qiu.Geodynamical process and stability control of high rock slope development[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(8): 1525-1544. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    查小刚. 断层是洒勒山滑坡的基础: 水和土体重力是它的决定因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 1983(3): 27-33.
    (ZHA Xiao-gang.Fault is basic of Saleshan landslide: the determinant is water and soil gravity[J]. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 1983(3): 27-33. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    童立强, 张晓坤, 李曼, 等. “6·28”关岭滑坡特大地质灾害应急遥感调查研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2010(3): 65-68.
    (TONG Li-qiang, ZHANG Xiao-kun, LI Man, et al.Emergency remote sensing research on super large geological disasters caused by “6·28” Guanling landslide[J]. Remote Sensing for Land ＆ Resources, 2010(3): 65-68. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    孔纪名, 田述军, 阿发友, 等. 贵州关岭“6·28”特大滑坡特征和成因[J]. 山地学报, 2010, 28(6): 725-731.
    (KONG Ji-ming, TIAN Shu-jun, A Fa-you, et al. Guizhou Guiling landslide formation mechanism and its characteristics[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2010, 28(6): 725-731. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 433-454.
    (HUANG Run-qiu.Large-scale landslides and their sliding mechanisms in China since the 20th century[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(3): 433-454. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    李建林, 王乐华, 孙旭曙. 节理岩体卸荷各向异性力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(5): 892-900.
    (LI Jian-lin, WANG Le-hua, SUN Xu-shu.Experimental study on anisotropic mechanical characteristics of jointed rock masses under unloading condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(5): 892-900. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    YANG S Q, JING H W, XU T.Strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing a single fissure under uniaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2011, 168(2): 227-250.
    [8]
    杨圣奇. 断续三裂隙砂岩强度破坏和裂缝扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(1): 31-39.
    (YANG Sheng-qi.Study of strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of sandstone containing three pre-existing fissures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(1): 31-39. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    殷跃平. 斜倾厚层山体滑坡视向滑动机制研究——以重庆武隆鸡尾山滑坡为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2): 217-226.
    (YIN Yue-ping.Mechanism on apparent dip sliding of inclined bedding rockslide: a case study of Jiweishan rockslide in Wulong, Chongqing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2): 217-226. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    岑夺丰, 黄达, 黄润秋. 岩质边坡断续裂隙阶梯状滑移模式及稳定性计算[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(4): 695-706.
    (CEN Duo-feng, HUANG Da, HUANG Run-qiu.Step-path failure mode and stability calculation of jointed rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 695-706. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    EBERHARDT E, SSTEAD D, COGGAN J S, Hybrid finite-discrete-element modeling of progressive failure in massive rock slopes[C]// ISRM 2003-Technology roadmap for rock mechanics. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2003.
    [12]
    GUGLIELMI Y, CAPPA F.Regional-scale relief evolution and large landslides: insights from geomechanical analyses in the Tinée Valley (southern French Alps)[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 117(11): 121-129.
    [13]
    钟助, 黄达, 黄润秋. “挡墙溃屈”型滑坡锁固段抗滑稳定性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(9): 1734-1740.
    (ZHONG Zhu, HUANG Da.Anti-sliding stability of locked patch of rock slopes with landslide mode of retaining wall collapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1734-1740. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    秦四清, 李国梁, 薛雷. 锁固体破裂标志性地震震级与峰值强度点地震震级的统计关系[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(5): 1841-1844.
    (QIN Si-qing, LI Guo-liang, XUE Lei.A statistical relation between the symbolic earthquake magnitude and the earthquake magnitude at peak strength point during the failure process of looked patch[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(5): 1841-1844. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    黄润秋, 陈国庆, 唐鹏. 基于动态演化特征的锁固段型岩质滑坡前兆信息研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(3): 521-533.
    (Precursor information of locking segment landslides based on transient characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(3): 521-533. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    黄达, 岑夺丰. 单轴静-动相继压缩下单裂隙岩样力学响应及能量耗散机制颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(9): 1926-1936.
    (HUANG Da,CEN Duo-feng.Mechanical response and energy dissipation mechanism of rock specimen with a single fissure under static and dynamic uniaxial compression successively using particle flow code simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(9): 1926-1936. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    刘顺桂, 刘海宁, 王思敬, 等. 断续节理直剪试验与PFC2D数值模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(9): 1828-1836.
    (LIU Shun-gui, LIU Hai-ning, WANG Si-jing, et al.Direct shear tests and PFC2D numerical simulation of intermittent joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(9): 1828-1836. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    徐金明, 谢芝蕾, 贾海涛. 石灰岩细观力学特性的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊2): 390-395.
    (XU Jin-ming, XIE Zhi-lei, JIA Hai-tao.Simulation of mesomechanical properties of limestone using particle flow code[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S2): 390-395. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    余华中, 阮怀宁, 褚卫江. 岩石节理剪切力学行为的颗粒流数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(7): 1482-1490.
    (YU Hua-zhong, RUAN Huai-ning, CHU Wei-jiang.Particle flow code modeling of shear behavior of rockjoints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(7): 1482-1490. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    Itasca Consulting Group Inc. PFC2D (particle flow code in 2D) theory and background[R]. Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group Inc, 2008.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(35)

    1. 张季如，陈敬鑫，王磊，彭伟珂. 三轴剪切过程中排水条件对钙质砂颗粒破碎、变形和强度特性的影响. 岩土力学. 2024(02): 375-384 .
    2. 黄良，刘鑫，兰恒星. 钙质砂特征形状分析及不排水剪切强度研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(02): 378-386 .
    3. 陈军浩，张艳娥，王刚，王恒. 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究. 岩土力学. 2024(08): 2290-2298 .
    4. 钟昊宇，汤斌，王银川. 长期直接剪切作用下钙质砂的颗粒破碎特性研究. 水利水运工程学报. 2024(04): 118-126 .
    5. 王建平，安韶，方斌. 基于离散元的强夯法加固珊瑚礁砂地基机理分析. 工业建筑. 2024(10): 199-204 .
    6. 刘萌成，陈茂林，王涓. 钙质砂固结排水剪切特性三轴试验. 中国公路学报. 2023(01): 47-57 .
    7. 尹福顺，李飒，刘鑫. 钙质粗粒料颗粒强度和压缩特性的试验研究. 岩土力学. 2023(04): 1120-1129+1152 .
    8. 李鹏琳，黄小明，陶然，徐青云. 珊瑚礁地区混凝土管桩承载特性模拟分析. 铁道建筑. 2023(05): 94-99 .
    9. 曾凯锋，向富榆，刘华北. 钙质砂单调及循环单剪试验研究. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(07): 27-35 .
    10. 徐刚敏，吴杨，吴毅航，黄义正，曾润，廖静容，李能. 间断级配吹填珊瑚砂剪切和颗粒破碎特性. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2023(04): 56-64 .
    11. Huan He，Siyue Li，Kostas Senetakis，Matthew Richard Coop，Songyu Liu. Influence of anisotropic stress path and stress history on stiffness of calcareous sands from Western Australia and the Philippines. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2022(01): 197-209 .
    12. 刘萌成，胡帅峰，戴鹏飞. 南海钙质砂不排水剪切特性三轴试验. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 69-76 .
    13. 高敏，何绍衡，夏唐代，丁智，王新刚，张琼方. 复杂应力路径下钙质砂颗粒破碎及抗剪强度特性. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 321-330 .
    14. 王兆南，王刚，叶沁果，殷浩. 三轴应力路径下珊瑚砂的颗粒破碎模型. 岩土工程学报. 2021(03): 540-546 . 本站查看
    15. 秦志光，袁晓铭，曹振中，莫红艳. 吹填珊瑚礁砂地基处理方法适用性与加固效果应用研究. 自然灾害学报. 2021(01): 78-88 .
    16. 张季如，罗明星，彭伟珂，张弼文. 不同应力路径下钙质砂力学特性的排水三轴试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(04): 593-602 . 本站查看
    17. Gang Wang，Zhaonan Wang，Qinguo Ye，Jingjing Zha. Particle breakage evolution of coral sand using triaxial compression tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2021(02): 321-334 .
    18. 王兆南，王刚，叶沁果，查京京. 考虑颗粒破碎的钙质砂边界面循环本构模型. 岩土工程学报. 2021(05): 886-892 . 本站查看
    19. 刘家明，童华炜，赵寄橦，袁杰. 盐溶液环境下微生物固化技术加固钙质砂的试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2021(12): 5046-5053 .
    20. 安晓宇，王斐，左殿军，朱前林. 珊瑚礁钙质砂微观结构分析. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(06): 6-11+18+4 .
    21. 张钰，丁选明，彭宇，蒋春勇. 珊瑚碎屑颗粒内孔隙特性微观试验研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2021(03): 497-503 .
    22. 罗明星，张季如，刘晓璇. 考虑应力路径和颗粒破碎影响的钙质砂剪胀特性及剪胀方程研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(08): 1453-1462 . 本站查看
    23. 王刚，杨俊杰，王兆南. 钙质砂临界状态随颗粒破碎演化规律分析. 岩土工程学报. 2021(08): 1511-1517 . 本站查看
    24. 余玮平，顾琳琳，王振，闫斌，叶冠林. 钙质砂颗粒破碎对临界状态影响的试验研究. 工程地质学报. 2021(05): 1276-1285 .
    25. 何绍衡，夏唐代，于丙琪，丁智，高敏，单华峰. 温度效应对钙质砂体积应变和固结特性的影响. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2020(02): 221-232+290 .
    26. 曾凯锋，刘华北. 考虑颗粒破碎的钙质砂修正邓肯-张E-B模型. 工程地质学报. 2020(01): 94-102 .
    27. 杨超. 钙质砂颗粒破碎的研究进展. 五邑大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(01): 52-57+67 .
    28. 王秉相，程普锋，郑宇轩，周风华. 应力波在散体颗粒中的传播规律. 高压物理学报. 2020(04): 100-107 .
    29. 王伟光，郝秀文，李婉，姚志华. 碾压方式对珊瑚砂地基工程特性的影响. 长江科学院院报. 2020(08): 113-119 .
    30. 张季如，华晨，罗明星，张弼文. 三轴排水剪切下钙质砂的颗粒破碎特性. 岩土工程学报. 2020(09): 1593-1602 . 本站查看
    31. 吴杨，崔杰，李能，王星，吴毅航，郭舒洋. 岛礁吹填珊瑚砂力学行为与颗粒破碎特性试验研究. 岩土力学. 2020(10): 3181-3191 .
    32. 李腾飞，柴寿喜. 四种形状珊瑚砂颗粒组合试样的静止侧压力系数变化. 天津城建大学学报. 2020(06): 404-408 .
    33. 王刚，查京京，魏星. 循环三轴应力路径下钙质砂颗粒破碎演化规律. 岩土工程学报. 2019(04): 755-760 . 本站查看
    34. 姚凯，孙秋，钱春杰，石名磊. 土石混合路堑边坡稳定分析. 西部交通科技. 2019(03): 14-18+161 .
    35. 何绍衡，夏唐代，李玲玲，丁智，单华峰. 温度效应对珊瑚礁砂抗剪强度和颗粒破碎演化特性的影响研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2019(12): 2535-2549 .

    Other cited types(24)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (503) PDF downloads (360) Cited by(59)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return