• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HUANG Da, ZHANG Xiao-jing, GU Dong-ming. Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(9): 1601-1609. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201809005
Citation: HUANG Da, ZHANG Xiao-jing, GU Dong-ming. Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(9): 1601-1609. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201809005

Failure pattern and evolution mechanism of locking section in rock slope with three-section landslide mode

More Information
  • Received Date: May 11, 2017
  • Published Date: September 24, 2018
  • The geological structure and mechanical properties of locking section are the key control factors to the rock slope with three-section landslide mode. According to the characteristics of the geological structure of three-section landslide, physical model tests and particle flow numerical simulation method were used to study the influences of the angle of rock bridge of locking section (the angle between the line of the end of the tensile crack to the end of the creep section and the horizontal direction) on the failure mode and failure evolution of locking section in the rock slope with three-section landslide mode. The failure modes of the locking section can be summarized as tensile coalescence and mixed tensile-shear coalescence. With the increase of the angle of rock bridge of the locking section, the failure mode is changed from the tensile coalescence to the mixed tensile-shear one. When the angle is less than 90°, the failure of slope is caused by the tensile coalescence. When the angle is between 90°and 110°, the failure of slope is caused by the mixed tensile-shear coalescence. When the angle is greater than 110°, the failure occurs in other areas instead of the locking section. Based on the analysis of the strain-time curve of locking section, the tensile zone of the locking section decreases gradually with the increase of the angle of the rock bridge of the locking section, and its stress state is changed from the whole tension to the whole compression.
  • [1]
    黄润秋. 岩石高边坡发育的动力过程及其稳定性控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(8): 1525-1544.
    (HUANG Run-qiu.Geodynamical process and stability control of high rock slope development[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(8): 1525-1544. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    查小刚. 断层是洒勒山滑坡的基础: 水和土体重力是它的决定因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 1983(3): 27-33.
    (ZHA Xiao-gang.Fault is basic of Saleshan landslide: the determinant is water and soil gravity[J]. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 1983(3): 27-33. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    童立强, 张晓坤, 李曼, 等. “6·28”关岭滑坡特大地质灾害应急遥感调查研究[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2010(3): 65-68.
    (TONG Li-qiang, ZHANG Xiao-kun, LI Man, et al.Emergency remote sensing research on super large geological disasters caused by “6·28” Guanling landslide[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2010(3): 65-68. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    孔纪名, 田述军, 阿发友, 等. 贵州关岭“6·28”特大滑坡特征和成因[J]. 山地学报, 2010, 28(6): 725-731.
    (KONG Ji-ming, TIAN Shu-jun, A Fa-you, et al. Guizhou Guiling landslide formation mechanism and its characteristics[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2010, 28(6): 725-731. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 433-454.
    (HUANG Run-qiu.Large-scale landslides and their sliding mechanisms in China since the 20th century[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(3): 433-454. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    李建林, 王乐华, 孙旭曙. 节理岩体卸荷各向异性力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(5): 892-900.
    (LI Jian-lin, WANG Le-hua, SUN Xu-shu.Experimental study on anisotropic mechanical characteristics of jointed rock masses under unloading condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(5): 892-900. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    YANG S Q, JING H W, XU T.Strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing a single fissure under uniaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2011, 168(2): 227-250.
    [8]
    杨圣奇. 断续三裂隙砂岩强度破坏和裂缝扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(1): 31-39.
    (YANG Sheng-qi.Study of strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of sandstone containing three pre-existing fissures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(1): 31-39. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    殷跃平. 斜倾厚层山体滑坡视向滑动机制研究——以重庆武隆鸡尾山滑坡为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2): 217-226.
    (YIN Yue-ping.Mechanism on apparent dip sliding of inclined bedding rockslide: a case study of Jiweishan rockslide in Wulong, Chongqing[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2): 217-226. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    岑夺丰, 黄达, 黄润秋. 岩质边坡断续裂隙阶梯状滑移模式及稳定性计算[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(4): 695-706.
    (CEN Duo-feng, HUANG Da, HUANG Run-qiu.Step-path failure mode and stability calculation of jointed rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 695-706. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    EBERHARDT E, SSTEAD D, COGGAN J S, Hybrid finite-discrete-element modeling of progressive failure in massive rock slopes[C]// ISRM 2003-Technology roadmap for rock mechanics. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2003.
    [12]
    GUGLIELMI Y, CAPPA F.Regional-scale relief evolution and large landslides: insights from geomechanical analyses in the Tinée Valley (southern French Alps)[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 117(11): 121-129.
    [13]
    钟助, 黄达, 黄润秋. “挡墙溃屈”型滑坡锁固段抗滑稳定性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(9): 1734-1740.
    (ZHONG Zhu, HUANG Da.Anti-sliding stability of locked patch of rock slopes with landslide mode of retaining wall collapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(9): 1734-1740. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    秦四清, 李国梁, 薛雷. 锁固体破裂标志性地震震级与峰值强度点地震震级的统计关系[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(5): 1841-1844.
    (QIN Si-qing, LI Guo-liang, XUE Lei.A statistical relation between the symbolic earthquake magnitude and the earthquake magnitude at peak strength point during the failure process of looked patch[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(5): 1841-1844. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    黄润秋, 陈国庆, 唐鹏. 基于动态演化特征的锁固段型岩质滑坡前兆信息研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(3): 521-533.
    (Precursor information of locking segment landslides based on transient characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(3): 521-533. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    黄达, 岑夺丰. 单轴静-动相继压缩下单裂隙岩样力学响应及能量耗散机制颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(9): 1926-1936.
    (HUANG Da,CEN Duo-feng.Mechanical response and energy dissipation mechanism of rock specimen with a single fissure under static and dynamic uniaxial compression successively using particle flow code simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(9): 1926-1936. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    刘顺桂, 刘海宁, 王思敬, 等. 断续节理直剪试验与PFC2D数值模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(9): 1828-1836.
    (LIU Shun-gui, LIU Hai-ning, WANG Si-jing, et al.Direct shear tests and PFC2D numerical simulation of intermittent joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(9): 1828-1836. (in Chinese))
    [18]
    徐金明, 谢芝蕾, 贾海涛. 石灰岩细观力学特性的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊2): 390-395.
    (XU Jin-ming, XIE Zhi-lei, JIA Hai-tao.Simulation of mesomechanical properties of limestone using particle flow code[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S2): 390-395. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    余华中, 阮怀宁, 褚卫江. 岩石节理剪切力学行为的颗粒流数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(7): 1482-1490.
    (YU Hua-zhong, RUAN Huai-ning, CHU Wei-jiang.Particle flow code modeling of shear behavior of rockjoints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(7): 1482-1490. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    Itasca Consulting Group Inc. PFC2D (particle flow code in 2D) theory and background[R]. Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group Inc, 2008.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Mechanical behavior and mesoscopic failure mechanism of high-temperature granite under different cooling methods in Brazilian tensile tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241039
    [2]DENG Ming-jiang, CAI Zheng-yin, ZHU Xun, ZHANG Chen. Failure mechanism and reinforcement measures of shallow slopes of expansive soils in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(S2): 50-55. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2020S2009
    [3]CHEN Guo-qing, CHEN Yi, SUN Xiang, WANG Dong, QING Chang-an, LIN Zhi-heng. Crack coalescence and brittle failure characteristics of open rock bridges[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 908-915. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202005013
    [4]WANG Lin-feng, TANG Hong-mei, TANG Fen, YE Si-qiao. Failure mechanism of gently inclined bedding rock mass slopes with complex fissures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(12): 2253-2260. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201712014
    [5]MA Yan, WANG Jia-ding, PENG Shu-jun, LI Bin. Deformation and failure mechanism of high sticking loess slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 518-528. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603016
    [6]LIANG Zheng-zhao, XIAO Dong-kun, LI Cong-cong, WU Xian-kai, GONG Bin. Numerical study on strength and failure modes of rock mass with discontinuous joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 2086-2095. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201411015
    [7]WANG Lin-feng, CHEN Hong-kai, TANG Hong-mei. Mechanical mechanism of failure for anti-inclined rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 884-889.
    [8]FENG Hu, LIU Guo-bin. Numerical simulation of failure mechanism of deep foundation pits in soft soil considering impact of piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 314-320.
    [9]LI Hong-wei. Deformation and failure mechanism of steeply dipping bedding high slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 146-151.
    [10]WU Ke, LUAN Maotian, FAN Qinglai, WANG Zhiyun. Failure mechanism and ultimate bearing capacity of bucket foundation in shallow water[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(3): 394-398.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 张科,李娜. 干湿循环作用下岩桥破裂演化及前兆异常定量识别研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(01): 64-73 .
    2. 刘帅,杨更社,潘振兴. 冻融环境下“三段式”岩质边坡锁固段损伤破坏及灾变机制研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(11): 2781-2795 .
    3. 黎俊华. 基于极限平衡法的边坡稳定性分析. 采矿技术. 2023(01): 39-44 .
    4. 王建明,崔新男,陈忠辉,陈冲. 露天矿含后缘裂隙岩质边坡岩体卸荷断裂机理与稳定性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 345-353 . 本站查看
    5. 郭朋瑜,闫兴田,吉锋,易林立. 四川茂县新磨村滑坡启动机制物理模拟试验研究. 工程地质学报. 2023(01): 154-164 .
    6. 林之岳,黎俊华,王道林. 基于爆破振速演变规律的采场安全分析. 黄金. 2023(03): 5-11 .
    7. 冷先伦,王川,盛谦,宋文军,陈健,张占荣,陈菲. 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究. 岩土力学. 2023(05): 1283-1294+1308 .
    8. 冉孟坤,韦港荣,熊春发,卢超波,秦梓航. 广西某高速公路基于切线角理论的隧道变形监测预警应用研究. 四川地质学报. 2023(02): 302-306+312 .
    9. 刘先林,范杰,朱觉文,李明智,朱星. 单轴压缩下岩桥脆性断裂的临界慢化特征. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2022(03): 166-175 .
    10. 朱星,唐垚. 锁固段边坡模型破坏前兆特征. 地球科学. 2022(06): 1957-1968 .
    11. 杨泓全,范杰,黄成年,刘先林,朱星. 中部锁固岩桥脆性断裂特征试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(15): 6255-6263 .
    12. 杨奎斌,朱彦鹏. 考虑后缘裂缝影响的均质土坡滑动面形式及搜索研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(05): 1216-1227 .
    13. 王闯,董金玉,刘汉东,黄志全,赵亚文,杨兴隆. 三段式锁固型岩质边坡动力响应特性及破坏机制振动台模型试验研究. 地球科学. 2022(12): 4428-4441 .
    14. 郑强强,徐颖,胡浩,钱佳威,宗琦,谢平. 单轴荷载作用下砂岩的破裂与速度结构层析成像. 岩土工程学报. 2021(06): 1069-1077 . 本站查看
    15. 陈永峰,张海东,赵广臣. 不同加载速率下端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2021(07): 66-72 .
    16. 张海东,陈永峰,赵广臣,张清华. 单轴压缩下预制端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展机制研究. 煤矿安全. 2021(09): 78-84 .
    17. 范杰,朱星,霍冬冬,胡桔维,刘俊峰. 基于数字图像相关和声发射的岩质锁固段破坏试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2021(36): 15581-15590 .
    18. 李巧刚,张树东,吴斌. 矿区大型滑坡体力学机理及地质演化模式研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2020(03): 214-220 .
    19. 乔趁,李长洪,王宇,颜丙乾. 冻融循环作用下中部锁固岩桥破坏试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(06): 1094-1103 .
    20. 王建明,陈忠辉,周子涵,陈帅,孙小欢. 不同卸荷速率下节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展演化试验研究. 矿业科学学报. 2020(04): 382-392 .
    21. 袁新华. 单轴压缩下中部锁固岩桥变形破坏模式及演化机制研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2020(09): 116-121 .
    22. 李冬冬,刘汉东. 风脉寺滑坡前缘阻滑体不同产状稳定性研究. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 8-12 .
    23. 姜彤,雷家华. 基于图像相关分析的锁固型滑坡模型试验方法. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(06): 41-45 .

    Other cited types(32)

Catalog

    Article views (501) PDF downloads (360) Cited by(55)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return