Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 36 Issue 4
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
YANG Guang-hua, JIANG Yan, ZHANG Yu-cheng, WANG En-qi. New method for determination of bearing capacity of soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 597-603. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201404001
Citation: YANG Guang-hua, JIANG Yan, ZHANG Yu-cheng, WANG En-qi. New method for determination of bearing capacity of soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 597-603. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201404001
shu

New method for determination of bearing capacity of soil foundation

  • 1. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou 510610, China; 2. The Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510640, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 05, 2013
  • Published Date: April 21, 2014
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Reasonable determination of bearing capacity of foundation is the most important part of foundation design. The in-situ plate loading test is the most reliable method to determine the bearing capacity. However, the actual bearing capacity relates to not only soil property but also the size, buried depth and settlement requirement of the foundation. The size of the plate in the plate loading test is not the same as that of actual foundation, and how to determine the bearing capacity of the actual foundation by the plate loading test reasonably is not yet addressed. Thus, a new solution method is proposed in this paper. That is, the strength and deformation parameters are back-computed by the plate loading test. Then, based on those parameters, the tangent modulus method is employed to compute the load - settlement curve (p–s curve) of the foundation. Finally, according to the double controlling principles, the settlement requirement and strength safety factor requirement of the foundation, the bearing capacity of the foundation is determined by the p–s curve. The bearing capacity meets both settlement and strength requirements of the foundation. An example is adopted to illustrate the proposed method, and results are compared with those by the methods of the current codes of China to prove the rationality of this new method.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (7)
  • [1]
    约瑟夫·E·波勒斯.基础工程分析与设计[M]. 5版. 童小东, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004. (JOSEPH E Bowles. Foundation analysis and design[M]. 5th ed. TONG Xiao-dong, trans. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2004. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    黄熙龄, 秦宝玖, 等. 地基基础的设计与计算[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1981. (HUANG Xi-ling, QIN Bao-jiu, et al. Design and calulation of building foundation[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1981. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    GB50007—2011 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. (GB50007—2011 Code for design of building foundation[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    DBJ15—31—2003 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003. (DBJ15—31—2003 Design code for building foundation[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2003. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    宰金珉, 翟洪飞, 周峰, 等. 按变形控制确定中、低压缩性地基土承载力的研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2008, 41(8): 72-80. (ZAI Jin-min, ZHAI Hong-fei, ZHOU Feng, et al. Determination of the bearing capacity of soil foundation in medium and low compressive soils using deformation control[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(8): 72-80. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    杨光华, 王恩麒. 基础宽度对地基承载力影响的数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(增刊2): 383-392. (YANG Guang-hua, WANG En-qi. Numerical analysis of width of foundation effect on the bearing capacity of soil foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(S2): 383-392. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    杨光华. 地基非线性沉降计算的原状土切线模量法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(11): 1927-1931. (YANG Guang-hua. Nonlinea settlement computation of the soil foundation with the undisturbed soil tangent modulus method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(11): 1927-1931. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Mechanical behavior and mesoscopic failure mechanism of high-temperature granite under different cooling methods in Brazilian tensile tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241039
    [2]DENG Ming-jiang, CAI Zheng-yin, ZHU Xun, ZHANG Chen. Failure mechanism and reinforcement measures of shallow slopes of expansive soils in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(S2): 50-55. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2020S2009
    [3]MA Yan, WANG Jia-ding, PENG Shu-jun, LI Bin. Deformation and failure mechanism of high sticking loess slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 518-528. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201603016
    [4]WANG Lin-feng, CHEN Hong-kai, TANG Hong-mei. Mechanical mechanism of failure for anti-inclined rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 884-889.
    [5]FENG Hu, LIU Guo-bin. Numerical simulation of failure mechanism of deep foundation pits in soft soil considering impact of piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 314-320.
    [6]LI Hong-wei. Deformation and failure mechanism of steeply dipping bedding high slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 146-151.
    [7]HUANG Zhiping, TANG Chunan, ZHU Wancheng, PANG Mingzhang. Numerical simulation on failure modes of rock bars under different wave lengths[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(7): 1048-1053.
    [8]CHEN Zhonghui, L.G.Tham, M.R.Yeung. Numerical simulation of damage and failure of rocks under different confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(5): 576-580.
    [9]LIU Hongyuan, LIU Jianxin, TANG Chunan. Numerical simulation of failure process of overburden rock strata caused by mining excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(2): 201-204.
    [10]Huang Jianan, Wang Sijing. Numerical Analysis of Fracture Mechanics for Rock Mass with Discrete Joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 5(3): 39-52.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 黄正均，武旭，郭国龙，马驰，张栋. 非贯通断续节理岩石剪切力学特性及破坏机理研究. 中国测试. 2025(02): 19-29+38 .
    2. 刘婷婷，曾乐乐，张超，李新平，杨婷，张腾胜. 节理分布形式对交叉节理岩体动态力学特性与破坏模式影响研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(01): 90-102 .
    3. 陈浩南，朱泽奇，庞鑫，万道春，夏禄清，张少军. 岩石卸荷的Mogi-Coulomb强度准则适用性研究. 力学与实践. 2024(03): 602-608 .
    4. 陈毅. 深埋硬岩隧道结构面对岩爆破坏特征的影响研究. 水电能源科学. 2024(07): 105-108+72 .
    5. 杜岩，张洪达，谢谟文，蒋宇静，李双全，刘敬楠. 大型危岩体崩塌灾害早期监测预警技术研究综述. 工程科学与技术. 2024(05): 10-23 .
    6. 孙杰龙，陈锐，李晓敏，邱明明，曹雪叶，王银. 单轴压缩下饱和裂隙红砂岩力学特性试验及PFC~(2D)模拟. 延安大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 114-120 .
    7. 高美奔，李天斌，陈国庆，孟陆波，马春驰，张岩，阴红宇，钟雨奕. 基于岩石峰前起裂及峰后特征的脆性评价方法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(04): 762-768 . 本站查看
    8. 刘先林，范杰，朱觉文，李明智，朱星. 单轴压缩下岩桥脆性断裂的临界慢化特征. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2022(03): 166-175 .
    9. 王刚，宋磊博，刘夕奇，包春燕，吝曼卿，刘广建. 非贯通节理花岗岩剪切断裂力学特性及声发射特征研究. 岩土力学. 2022(06): 1533-1545 .
    10. 郑强强，徐颖，胡浩，钱佳威，宗琦，谢平. 单轴荷载作用下砂岩的破裂与速度结构层析成像. 岩土工程学报. 2021(06): 1069-1077 . 本站查看
    11. 陈永峰，张海东，赵广臣. 不同加载速率下端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2021(07): 66-72 .
    12. 张海东，陈永峰，赵广臣，张清华. 单轴压缩下预制端部节理岩桥变形破坏及裂隙扩展机制研究. 煤矿安全. 2021(09): 78-84 .
    13. 李博，叶鹏进，黄林，王丁，赵程，邹良超. 干燥与饱和岩石裂隙受压变形与声发射特性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(12): 2249-2257 . 本站查看
    14. 袁新华. 单轴压缩下中部锁固岩桥变形破坏模式及演化机制研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2020(09): 116-121 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (704) PDF downloads (1279) Cited by(23)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return