• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Interval parameters and credibility of representative values of tensile and compression strength tests on rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(12): 1960-1965.
Citation: Interval parameters and credibility of representative values of tensile and compression strength tests on rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(12): 1960-1965.

Interval parameters and credibility of representative values of tensile and compression strength tests on rock

More Information
  • Received Date: August 23, 2009
  • Revised Date: July 05, 2010
  • Published Date: December 14, 2010
  • The interval parameters of rock tensile and compression strength to meet the strength of the limited laboratory tests and the characteristics of randomness and to reflect the range of features and the possibility of distribution are studied. Firstly, the concepts of the interval compression strength and the tensile strength are proposed. Secondly, based on the interval analysis, the blind data theory and laboratory practice, the solution method for the interval strength is proposed. Representative values of rock tensile and compression strength tests and their corresponding faith degrees are obtained using the theory of unascertained mathematics in favor of the project selection. Finally,the availability of the proposed methods is demonstrated by analying small and big samples. The small-sample results show that representative values of the rock strength and tensile strength by the proposed methods are smaller than those of the recommended methods by the conventional average values when the faith degree is 95%, and the faith degree of the conventional average values of rock strength is about 65%. It can be seen the representative conventional average values are dangerous. 320 rock specimens (big-sample) in a mine are divided into 64 groups, and each group has 5 rock specimens. The results show that 320 rock specimens follow the normal distributions. The average value of 238.17 MPa is regarded as the true value, and half of 64 conventional average values of strength are larger than the true value. It means that the warrant rate is 50%. 55 of 64 interval values of strength contain the true value, and the accuracy rate is 86%. The upper values from another 6 interval strengths are larger than the true value, which means that the warrant rate is 95% when the interval values of strength are representative values. It shows that the method is reasonable. The interval parameters of rock tensile and compression strength improve the rock strength parameters. It provides a new method to select rock strength parameters for conducting the reliability analysis, design and safety verification in actual engineering.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XIE Yi-fan, WU Ji-chun, WANG Yi, YE Yu, XIE Chun-hong, LU Chun-hui. Multiscale finite element-finite element model for simulating nodal Darcy velocity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(1): 107-114. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202201010
    [2]FENG Xing, YAO Yang-ping, Li Ru-ning, WAN Zheng. Application of UH model considering temperature to finite element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(zk2): 181-185. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2015S2035
    [3]DU Chuang, DING Hong-yan, ZHANG Pu-yang, LI Jing. Analysis of steel sheet pile cofferdam using finite element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 159-164. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2027
    [4]MA Xiao, QIAN Jian-gu, HAN Li-ming, CAO Jie, HUANG Mao-song. Equivalent finite element method for long-term settlement of subgrade induced by traffic load[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 910-913.
    [5]SUN Hai-zhong. Application of finite element numerical analysis in excavation design[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 129-133.
    [6]WANG Guo-cai, MA Da-jun, YANG Yang, ZHANG Jie. 3-D finite element analysis of ground settlement caused by shield construction of metro tunnels in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 266-270.
    [7]Finite element method for covered sheet pile wharfs[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(4).
    [8]HAN Bing, CAO Pinlu. Finite element analysis of interaction between soils and impact sampling bits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(10): 1560-1563.
    [9]ZHENG Hong, LI Chunguang, Lee C.F., GE Xiurun. Finite element method for solving the factor of safety[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(5): 626-628.
    [10]Yu Zehong, Zhang Qisen. Finite Element Analysis for Mechanism of Geonets-Soil Interaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(3): 79-85.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return