• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
AN Xiaoyu, WANG Fei, JI Wendong, ZHANG Yuting, LIU Xianpeng, LI Jiandong, YUAN Guangzong, BIAN Tianqi. Centrifugal model tests and numerical simulations of dragging motion state of Hall anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 117-121. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10005
Citation: AN Xiaoyu, WANG Fei, JI Wendong, ZHANG Yuting, LIU Xianpeng, LI Jiandong, YUAN Guangzong, BIAN Tianqi. Centrifugal model tests and numerical simulations of dragging motion state of Hall anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 117-121. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10005

Centrifugal model tests and numerical simulations of dragging motion state of Hall anchor

More Information
  • Received Date: April 30, 2024
  • For the submarine pipelines and cables laid flat or shallowly buried in the seabed, the accidental anchor dragging operation is one of the important factors affecting their safe operation. Due to the large deformation and failure of soil during the dragging process of the anchor in the soil, it involves many mechanical problems such as material nonlinearity, geometric nonlinearity and contact nonlinearity. It is difficult to accurately analyze the dragging process through the analytical research methods. In this paper, the centrifugal model tests and numerical analysis are used to study the dragging anchor. The motion trend, the development law of drag force and the penetration depth of anchors with different weights on different types of seabed are tested and calculated. The results show that the dragging anchor in low-strength cohesive soil is likely to produce a false bottom grabbing phenomenon. For the anchors are dragged on the medium- and high-strength cohesive soil seabed, the dragging process of the anchors can be divided into three stages: soil platform formation, anchor claw wedge and motion stability. On the non-cohesive soil and cohesive soil seabeds, the drag distance at the stability stage is 4 and 1.27 ~ 1.96 times the anchor length, respectively. For the Hall anchor with the weight greater than 6 t, whether on the cohesive soil seabed or the non-cohesive soil seabed, the penetration depth of the anchor claw is greater than 1 m, and the dragging operation is likely to cause direct damage to the submarine pipelines or cables, which needs attention.
  • [1]
    李海学, 朱青春, 魏颂珂. 船舶锚泊作业对海底管道安全风险分析[J]. 石油工程建设, 2023, 49(5): 47-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYGJ202305005.htm

    LI Haixue, ZHU Qingchun, WEI Songke. Analysis of safety risk of submarine pipelines in ship anchoring operations[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction, 2023, 49(5): 47-50. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYGJ202305005.htm
    [2]
    任宇晓, 闫澍旺, 闫玥, 等. 基于CEL方法对拖锚过程的数值分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(6): 1573-1578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201706021.htm

    REN Yuxiao, YAN Shuwang, YAN Yue, et al. Numerical analysis on dragging anchors in soil based on CEL[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(6): 1573-1578. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201706021.htm
    [3]
    闫澍旺, 任宇晓, 孙立强, 等. 砂土中的拖锚模型试验及锚抓力计算方法研究[J]. 中国造船, 2016, 57(1): 103-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZC201601012.htm

    YAN Shuwang, REN Yuxiao, SUN Liqiang, et al. Model test and calculation of holding capacity of hall anchor in dragging process in sand[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2016, 57(1): 103-115 (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZC201601012.htm
    [4]
    孙倩, 周宏, 周沛林. 应急抛锚状态下拖锚对海管的撞击损伤[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 23(4): 279-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JMXZ201804006.htm

    SUN Qian, ZHOU Hong, ZHOU Peilin. Study on the collision damage of submarine pipelines by towing anchor under emergency anchorage[J]. Journal of Jimei University(Natural Science), 2018, 23(4): 279-286. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JMXZ201804006.htm
    [5]
    池寅, 时豫川, 吴海洋, 等. 砂质海床中船锚运动全过程数值模拟[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2017, 50(6): 807-814. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201706002.htm

    CHI Yin, SHI Yuchuan, WU Haiyang, et al. Numerical simulation of whole movement process of an anchor in sandy seabed[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2017, 50(6): 807-814. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201706002.htm
    [6]
    包承纲, 饶锡保. 土工离心模型的试验原理[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1998, 15(2): 1-3, 7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB802.000.htm

    BAO Chenggang, RAO Xibao. Principle of the geotechnical centrifuge model test[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 1998, 15(2): 1-3, 7. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB802.000.htm
    [7]
    中华人民共和国船舶行业标准. 霍尔锚: GB/T 546—2016)[S]. 2016.

    PRC Shipbuilding Industry Standard. Hall anchor: GB/T 546—2016[S]. 2016. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    JÁKY J. The coefficient of earth pressure at rest[J]. Journal for the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers, 1944, 7: 355-358.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WU Min, HUANG Yinghao, DONG Shijun, ZHANG Rongjun. Effects of polymer flocculant on dredged sediment by plate and frame filter press dewatering technology and its influence mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 470-476. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231212
    [2]Experimental study on consolidation of dredged sludge by grouting flocculation-vacuum preloading method considering the influence of soil salinization[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240047
    [3]LIU Lu-lu, CAI Guo-jun, LIU Song-yu. Correlation between thermal and mechanical properties of recycled polyester fiber and inorganic curing agent-improved silt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(12): 2253-2262. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202212012
    [4]CAI Yuan-qiang. Consolidation mechanism of vacuum preloading for dredged slurry and anti-clogging method for drains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(2): 201-225. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202102001
    [5]ZHANG Rong-jun, DONG Chao-qiang, ZHENG Jun-jie, LU Zhan. Influences of flocculant and retarder on solidification efficiency of cement in treatment of dredged mud slurry[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(10): 1928-1935. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201910018
    [6]SHEN Yang, FENG Zhao-yan, LIU Han-long, WANG Qin-cheng, LI An. Experimental study on effects of initial concentration on settling velocity characteristics of turbid surface of South China Sea coral mud[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 22-26. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2005
    [7]ZHENG Ai-rong, ZHU Hong-man. Experimental study on flocculation-accelerated deposition of dredger fill[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(z2): 145-148. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2017S2036
    [8]WU Si-lin, ZHU Wei, MIN Fan-lu, ZHANG Chun-lei, WEI Dai-wei. Clogging mechanism and effect of cake permeability in soil-water separation using vacuum filtration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(8): 1530-1537. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201708022
    [9]DENG Dongsheng, HONG Zhenshun, LIU Chuanjun, DING Jianwen, HONG Pengyun. Large-scale model tests on dewater of dredged clay by use of ventilating vacuum method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(2): 250-253.
    [10]OU Xiaoduo, CAO Jing, ZHOU Dong, HUANG Shaokeng. Experimental study on chemical flocculating action of waste flush fluid[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 201-203.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 陈祎,刘明昊,赵智慧. 钻孔灌注桩废弃泥浆快速絮凝脱水技术与机理研究. 建筑施工. 2025(01): 6-11 .
    2. 孙万吉,陈建,梁志学,李朝阳,赵永享. 碱渣-矿渣-水玻璃对流态固化土的影响研究. 中国新技术新产品. 2024(19): 116-118+140 .
    3. 唐伟超,赵东平,王风,朱龙,汤青山,和琦. 砂卵土-泥岩复合地层土压平衡盾构渣土脱水试验. 现代隧道技术. 2024(S1): 684-693 .
    4. 张达志. 基桩施工产生的废弃泥浆絮凝脱水后的土体工程性质研究. 四川水力发电. 2024(S2): 29-34 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(5)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return