• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Calculation method of calculating rock pressure of deeply buried double-arch tunnel without middle drift[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240622
Citation: Calculation method of calculating rock pressure of deeply buried double-arch tunnel without middle drift[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240622

Calculation method of calculating rock pressure of deeply buried double-arch tunnel without middle drift

More Information
  • Received Date: June 27, 2024
  • Available Online: December 16, 2024
  • The multi arch tunnel without a central guide tunnel avoids the drawbacks of traditional multi arch tunnel construction processes such as complexity and frequent stress conversion. In recent years, it has been widely used in China, but there is no unified standard for calculating the surrounding rock pressure of this new structure. Based on the Prussian theory and process design method, considering the inhibitory effect of the support structure of the advance tunnel on the collapse arch height of the subsequent tunnel and the intensifying effect of the excavation of the subsequent tunnel on the surrounding rock pressure of the advance tunnel, a process load calculation method for deep buried multi arch tunnels without a central guide tunnel was established. Finally, the rationality of the process load calculation method was verified by comparing and analyzing with the monitoring and measurement results of typical engineering sites and reference calculation methods. The research results indicate that determining the support capacity of the advance tunnel support structure through the combination of stress distribution can quantify the inhibitory effect on the surrounding rock pressure of the subsequent tunnel; Quantitative analysis of the four main factors that affect the degree of influence on surrounding rock pressure (rock level S (32.66%), excavation width W1 (28.02%) of the front tunnel ,excavation width W2 (22.34%) of the rear tunnel, and support strength G (16.99%) of the front tunnel) makes the value of the coefficient of influence of rear tunnel excavation on the surrounding rock pressure of the front tunnel more reasonable. By solving the process load calculation method for deep buried multi arch tunnels without central guide tunnels, a more scientific and reasonable design basis can be provided for the support structure of multi arch tunnels without central guide tunnels.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Gang, WANG Pengju, WANG Changsheng, JIANG Yujing, LUAN Hengjie, HUANG Na. Shear mechanical behaviors of ceramic proppant-infilled sandstone fractures under constant normal stiffness boundary conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1790-1800. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220544
    [2]LU Su-jie, TONG Jun-hao, PAN Kun, YUAN Zong-hao, PAN Xiao-dong, SHI Li, HE Ben. Stiffness degradation of marine soft clay under monotonic and cyclic loadings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(S1): 116-120. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2020S1023
    [3]ZHOU Yan-guo, SHEN Tao, WANG Yue, DING Hai-jun. Post-earthquake evolution of small-strain shear stiffness at liquefiable deposit in Christchurch[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(8): 1411-1417. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202008005
    [4]WANG Teng, ZHANG Zhe. Experimental studies on cyclic shear behavior of steel-silt interface under constant normal stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(10): 1921-1927. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201910017
    [5]GUO Ru-kun, FENG Chun, TANG De-hong, QIAO Ji-yan, LI Shi-hai. Feasibility study on contact stiffness acquisition by hammering tests and numerical back-analysis for parallel structural plane of rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(10): 1911-1916. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201610022
    [6]LIU Jun-wei, ZHANG Zhong-miao, YU Feng, ZHAO Yu-bo. Estimation of friction fatigue for preformed piles based on constant normal stiffness shear test[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(4): 725-729.
    [7]CHEN Xi, CHENG Yong-gang. Accelerated symmetric stiffness matrix technique and its applications in geotechnical finite element analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(8): 1216-1221.
    [8]FENG Da-kuo, HOU Wen-jun, ZHANG Jian-min. Experimental study on cyclic behavior of gravel-structure interface with stress-control mode under constant normal stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(6): 846.
    [9]WANG Xudong, LIU Yuyi, ZAI Jinmin, ZHU Hongbo. Elastic-plastic solution for axially loaded single pile considering variation of shear stiffness coefficient[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(12): 1758-1762.
    [10]Pan Shisheng, Hou Xueyuan. Computation of Pile Head Stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 18(1): 1-6.

Catalog

    Article views (54) PDF downloads (7) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return