Effects of relative densities on mechanical characteristics of interface between sand and suction caisson during penetration

LI Da-yong; HOU Xin-yu; ZHANG Yu-kun; GAO Yu-feng

doi:10.11779/CJGE202209004

Volume 44 Issue 9

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2022 > 44(9): 1598-1607. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202209004

LI Da-yong, HOU Xin-yu, ZHANG Yu-kun, GAO Yu-feng. Effects of relative densities on mechanical characteristics of interface between sand and suction caisson during penetration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(9): 1598-1607. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202209004

Citation:

PDF (3763 KB)

Effects of relative densities on mechanical characteristics of interface between sand and suction caisson during penetration

1.
Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
2.
College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
3.
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

More Information

Received Date: April 13, 2021
Available Online: September 22, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Suction caissons are popular for mooring oil and gas platforms and fixing wind turbines. The penetration resistance is mainly the friction between the inner and outer walls during suction penetration in sand. During installation of the suction caisson, the frictional forces between the caisson wall and the soil are dominated by the shear behaviors of the interface between the caisson wall and the soil. A series of interface shear tests with the GDS interface shearing instrument are conducted to investigate the influences of the initial relative densities and penetration depth on the interfacial shear characteristics of soil-suction caisson. The test results show that the shear stress–shear displacement relationship curve of interface under different relative densities exhibits strain softening, and interfacial shear strength and the corresponding shear displacement increase with the increasing relative densities. It is found that the friction coefficient of interface increases with the increase of the relative density, and firstly increases and then decreases with the increase of the penetration depth. Under the experimental programs of tests, the friction coefficient of interface ranges from 0.2 to 0.34, and the friction resistance at different depths can be calculated in terms of the test results, indicating the friction resistance between the inner and outer walls increases exponentially with the increase of the penetration depth. The friction resistance between the inner and outer walls increases with the increase of the relative density, and the increase rate of friction of the outer wall is greater than that of the inner wall. When the penetration completes, the friction of the outer wall is 2.12 times that of the inner wall. During shearing, sand particles are found to be squeezed out, and they are mainly squeezed out at the initial stage of the testing, i.e., the corresponding shear displacement is relatively small. This phenomenon indicates that during installation of the suction caisson, the sand particles are squeezed out because of the replacement between the sand volume and the volume of suction caisson wall. The sand particles broken in the process of testing causes the sand volume to decrease. Besides, it is found that the ratio of the interfacial friction angle to the internal friction angle decreases with the increase of the relative density. To obtain the accurate installation resistance and the required suction to install the suction caisson, it is important to investigate the shear behaviors of the interface between the suction wall and the sand.

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	李大勇, 张雨坤, 高玉峰, 等. 中粗砂中吸力锚的负压沉贯模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(12): 2277–2283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201212022.htm LI Da-yong, ZHANG Yu-kun, GAO Yu-feng, et al. Model tests on penetration of suction anchors in medium-coarse sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(12): 2277–2283. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201212022.htm
[2]	王胤, 朱兴运, 杨庆. 考虑砂土渗透性变化的吸力锚沉贯及土塞特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(1): 184–190. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201901025.htm WANG Yin, ZHU Xing-yun, YANG Qing. Installation of suction caissons and formation of soil plug considering variation of permeability of sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1): 184–190. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201901025.htm
[3]	丁红岩, 张浦阳. 海上吸力锚负压下沉渗流场的特性分析[J]. 海洋技术, 2003, 22(4): 44–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2029.2003.04.011 DING Hong-yan, ZHANG Pu-yang. Suction penetration seepage field's characteristics of suction anchor[J]. Ocean Technology, 2003, 22(4): 44–48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2029.2003.04.011
[4]	HOULSBY G T, BYRNE B W. Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in sand[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 158(3): 135–144. doi: 10.1680/geng.2005.158.3.135
[5]	HOULSBY G T, BYRNE B W. Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers- Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 158(2): 75–82. doi: 10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75
[6]	MEHRAVAR M, HARIRECHE O, FARAMARZI A, et al. Modelling the variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand using FLAC3D[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2017, 12(7): 893–899. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2015.1051311
[7]	李大勇, 吴宇旗, 张雨坤, 等. 砂土中桶形基础吸力值的设定范围[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(4): 985–992, 1002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201704010.htm LI Da-yong, WU Yu-qi, ZHANG Yu-kun, et al. Determination of suction range for penetration of suction caissons in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(4): 985–992, 1002. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201704010.htm
[8]	李大勇, 吴宇旗, 张雨坤. 砂土中吸力式桶形基础竖向承载性状研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(3): 33–39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3767.2016.03.005 LI Da-yong, WU Yu-qi, ZHANG Yu-kun. Vertical bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation in sand[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2016, 35(3): 33–39. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3767.2016.03.005
[9]	CHEN F, LIAN J J, WANG H J, et al. Large-scale experimental investigation of the installation of suction caissons in silt sand[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2016, 60: 109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.09.004
[10]	HARIRECHE O, MEHRAVAR M, ALANI A M. Suction caisson installation in sand with isotropic permeability varying with depth[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2013, 43: 256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.10.008
[11]	闫澍旺, 霍知亮, 楚剑, 等. 黏土中桶形基础负压下沉阻力及土塞发展试验[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2016, 49(10): 1027–1033. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201610004.htm YAN Shu-wang, HUO Zhi-liang, CHU Jian, et al. Experiment on penetration resistance and soil plug development during suction caisson penetration in soft clay[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2016, 49(10): 1027–1033. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDX201610004.htm
[12]	LIU R, MA W G, QI Y, et al. Experimental studies on the drag reduction effect of bucket foundation installation under suction pressure in sand[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2019, 14(5): 421–431. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1500188
[13]	NARDELLI A, CACCIARI P P, FUTAI M M. Sand-concrete interface response: the role of surface texture and confinement conditions[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(6): 1675–1694. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2019.05.013
[14]	TIWARI B, AL-ADHADH A R. Influence of relative density on static soil–structure frictional resistance of dry and saturated sand[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014, 32(2): 411–427. doi: 10.1007/s10706-013-9723-6
[15]	TEJCHMAN J, WU W. Experimental and numerical study of sand-steel interfaces[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1995, 19(8): 513–536. doi: 10.1002/nag.1610190803
[16]	JITSANGIAM P, PRA-AI S, BOULON M, et al. Characterization of a soil–rough structure interface using direct shear tests with varying cyclic amplitude and loading sequences under a large cyclic testing cycle condition[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 17(5): 1829–1845.
[17]	郭聚坤, 寇海磊, 许泓霖, 等. 桩–海洋黏土界面剪切性状试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(4): 104–108, 117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201904024.htm GUO Ju-kun, KOU Hai-lei, XU Hong-lin, et al. Experimental study on shear behaviors of interface between pile and marine clay[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(4): 104–108, 117. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201904024.htm
[18]	祁越, 刘润, 练继建. 无黏性土中筒型基础负压下沉模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(1): 139–150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201801018.htm QI Yue, LIU Run, LIAN Ji-jian. Model test of bucket foundation suction installation in cohesionless soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(1): 139–150. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201801018.htm
[19]	袁中立, 秦延龙, 唐海燕. 浅海桶形基础平台[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010. YUAN Zhong-li, QIN Yan-long, TANG Hai-yan. Bucket Foundation Platform in Shallow Sea[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

[1]	WANG Haiyang, CHEN Pingshan, HE Liping. Model tests on consolidation of soft foundation by deep cement mixing method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 170-174. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10023
[2]	LIU Song-yu, CAI Guang-hua, DU Guang-yin, WANG Liang. Model tests on carbonated reactive MgO mixing piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(z2): 136-139. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2017S2034
[3]	MA Cong, TAN Yue-hu, LI Er-bing, YANG Meng, TAN Xing-wang. Anti-permeability of soil-cement mixing piles under coral reef geological conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 788-792. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201404027
[4]	ZHAO Chun-feng, ZOU Yu-wan, ZHAO Cheng, XIE Xiao-dong, ZHOU Yu-shi. Experimental research on strength of five-axis cement-soil mixed piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(2): 376-381. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201402015
[5]	LI Ran, LIU Run, XU Yu, LIN Min-bo. Influence factor analysis of cement mixing pile method in treating vehicle bumping at bridge head in soft soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 725-729.
[6]	LI Guo-wei, JIANG Wei, WU Yu-cai, WEI Shu-hong, LUO Zeng-yi, DAI Jian. Field tests on detecting cement mixing piles by static cone penetration tests in reserved hole[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1289-1296.
[7]	HUO Jing, ZHU Jin, HU Zheng-liang, LI Hai-bing, HUI Yong-chuan. Application of deep mixing cement soil mixing wall (CSM )[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 666-670.
[8]	YUAN Ju-yun, JING Lu, LI Yang, KANG Zhu-liang. Applicatin of desulphogypsum soil cemedine to deep mixing piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(zk1): 16-21.
[9]	LIU Songyu, ZHU Zhiduo, XI Peisheng, YI Yaolin. Comparison between T-shaped deep mixing method and traditional deep mixing method for soft ground improvement[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(7): 1059-1068.
[10]	HE Kaisheng. Study of design methods of deep cement-soil mixing piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(1): 31-35.