Citation: | GUO Hong-yan, JI Ya-ying, FANG Lin, LI Ke, TANG Cheng-ping, WANG Shi-fa. External water pressures and limited emission standards of water-rich tunnels based on fluid-solid coupling analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 165-168. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S1042 |
[1] |
余庆锋, 吴立. 高速铁路隧道岩溶突水发生机理研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(30): 199-205.
(YU Qing-feng WU Li. Study on karst water inrush mechanism in high-speed railway tunnel[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(30): 199-205. (in Chinese)) |
[2] |
刘建, 刘丹, 宋凯. 渝怀铁路歌乐山隧道排水的地下水环境负效应评价[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2012, 49(4): 179-183.
(LIU Jian, LIU Dan, SONG Ka.Evaluation of the negative effects on groundwater environment resulted by Geleshan tunnel drainage[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2012, 49(4): 179-183. (in Chinese)) |
[3] |
单士军, 李耐霞. 歌乐山隧道施工过程环境影响分析及建议[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2004, 30(11): 21-22.
(SHAN Shi-jun, LI Nai-xia.The analysis and suggestion of environmental impact on Geleshan tunnel construction[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2004, 30(11): 21-22. (in Chinese)) |
[4] |
刘志春, 朱永全, 高新强, 等. 干旱山区隧道施工地下水环境保护技术研究[R]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2010.
(LIU Zhi-chun, ZHU Yong-quan, GAO Xin-qiang, et al.Study on technology of groundwater environment protection during tunnel construction in the arid mountain area[R]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2010. (in Chinese)) |
[5] |
付钢, 王磊. 高压富水地层中隧道衬砌结构设计方法探讨[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007, 3(2): 252-257.
(FU Gang, WANG Lei.Study on design method of lining structure of the highway tunnel in deep-lying stratum with highwater level[J]. Chinese Journal of Under ground Space and Engineering, 2007, 3(2): 252-257. (in Chinese)) |
[6] |
赵瑞, 许模, 范辰辰. 隔挡式背斜区隧道群地下水渗流场模拟演化[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015, 52(3): 69-74.
(ZHAO Rui, XU Mo, FAN Chen-chen.Numerical simulation of the groundwater seepage field of a tunnel group in an ejective anticline zone[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52(3): 69-74. (in Chinese)) |
[7] |
刘志春, 万良勇. 地层注浆加固对隧道与地下水相互作用过程中的“双赢”影响效应分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015, 52(2): 87-96.
(LIU Zhi-chun, WAN Liang-yong.Win-win effect of ground consolidation grouting on the interaction between tunnel and groundwater[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52(2): 87-96. (in Chinese)) |
[8] |
王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3): 5-10.
(WANG Jian-yu.Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(3): 5-10. (in Chinese)) |
[9] |
王秀英, 王梦恕, 张弥. 计算隧道排水量及衬砌外水压力的一种简化方法[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 2004, 28(1): 8-10.
(WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi.A simple method to calculate tunnel discharge and external water pressure on lining[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (in Chinese)) |
[10] |
皇甫明, 谭忠盛, 王梦恕, 等. 暗挖海底隧道渗流量解析解及其应用[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009, 11(7): 66-70.
(HUANGFU Ming, TAN Zhong-sheng, WANG Meng-shu, et al.An analytical solution for water inflow into a subsea tunnel and its application[J]. Journal of China Engineering Science, 2009, 11(7): 66-70. (in Chinese)) |
[11] |
杨会军, 王梦恕. 深埋长大隧道渗流数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(3): 511-519.
(YANG Hui-jun, WANG Meng-shu.Numerical simulation of seepage in deep-buried long and big tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(3): 511-519. (in Chinese)) |
[1] | LIU Hongwei, WANG Mengqi, ZHAN Liangtong, FENG Song, WU Tao. Method and apparatus for measuring in-situ gas diffusion coefficient and permeability coefficient of unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(5): 948-958. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221228 |
[2] | TAO Gaoliang, PENG Yinjie, CHEN Yin, XIAO Henglin, LUO Chenchen, ZHONG Chuheng, LEI Da. A new fast prediction method for relative permeability coefficient of unsaturated soils based on NMR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 470-479. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221426 |
[3] | XIE Qiang, CHEN Yucheng, FU Xiang, TIAN Dalang, BAN Yuxin, XU Dongdong. Fluid-solid coupling model for discontinuous deformation analysis of unsaturated transient seepage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 299-306. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221026 |
[4] | Theoretical equation to predict permeability coefficient for unsaturated sandy soils and its application in the quality analysis of pavement drainage base layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221049 |
[5] | YU Hai-tao, WANG Zhi-kun, LIU Zhong-xian. Influence mechanism of permeability coefficient in homogeneously saturated strata on responses of deep tunnels under incidence of SV waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 201-211. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202202001 |
[6] | SHAO Long-tan, WEN Tian-de, GUO Xiao-xia. Direct measurement method and prediction formula for permeability coefficient of unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 806-812. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201905002 |
[7] | MA Ya-wei, CHEN Wen-wu, BI Jun, GUO Gui-hong, JIAO Gui-de. Influence of dry density on coefficient of permeability of unsaturated loess[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S1): 165-170. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1027 |
[8] | CHEN Wen-wu, LIU Wei, WANG Juan, SUN Guan-ping, WU Wei-jiang, HOU Xiao-qiang. Prediction of coefficient of permeability of unsaturated loess with different seepage durations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S1): 22-27. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1004 |
[9] | CAI Guo-qing, SHENG Dai-chao, ZHOU An-nan. Approach for predicting the relative coefficient of permeability of unsaturated soils with different initial void ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(5): 827-835. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201405004 |
[10] | Gao Ji, Lei Guangyao, Zhang Suochun. Numerical Analysis on Seepage through the Saturated and Unsaturated Soils of Levees or Dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(6): 28-37. |
1. |
王学峰,李翱翔,史国良,岳春强,张鹏. 大直径超长灌注桩承载特性研究. 山西建筑. 2025(04): 76-81 .
![]() | |
2. |
张高良. 复杂地质环境下桥梁钻孔灌注桩施工关键技术研究. 建筑技术. 2025(01): 61-64 .
![]() | |
3. |
田圆圆. 桥梁后压浆灌注桩承载特性试验研究. 运输经理世界. 2025(01): 75-77 .
![]() | |
4. |
韩重庆,戴璐,黄远,陈乾. 南京市中心医院综合楼原址新建项目单侧大悬挑超限高层结构设计. 建筑结构. 2024(16): 107-113+68 .
![]() | |
5. |
郭能荣. 后压浆桩基承载特性试验研究与分析. 交通世界. 2024(22): 150-153 .
![]() | |
6. |
朱文波,戴国亮,邓会元,竺明星,龚维明. 后顶扩臂压浆桩竖向承载机理及其桩盘力学性能研究. 土木工程学报. 2024(10): 82-94 .
![]() | |
7. |
毛龙,朱文波,杨嘉毅,李勇海,邓会元,程丹莲. 移动射流加固吸力式沉箱基础承载特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(S2): 226-230+241 .
![]() | |
8. |
夏建中,刘天豪. 不同土体条件下超灌量对桩体位移的影响分析. 浙江科技学院学报. 2023(01): 55-61 .
![]() | |
9. |
吴建军,龚洪兵,胡伟,陈东旭. 桥梁工程后压浆灌注桩承载特性试验研究. 交通世界. 2023(Z2): 226-228+231 .
![]() | |
10. |
吴征,祁熙鹏,党涛,苗苗,陈强. 黄土地层桥梁桩基后压浆技术研究进展. 市政技术. 2023(06): 91-99+106 .
![]() | |
11. |
臧诗齐 ,戴国亮 ,钱晓楠 . 不同注浆材料作用下后压浆桩桩-土界面力学特性分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 496-503 .
![]() | |
12. |
詹伟达,欧红亮,王幸,娄学谦,刘日炜. 桩端及桩侧后注浆对超长灌注桩承载特性的影响. 公路交通科技. 2023(09): 141-150 .
![]() | |
13. |
史昊. 银川沈阳西路快速化改造总体设计研究. 中国水运. 2022(02): 144-146 .
![]() | |
14. |
翟聪,罗志聪,柳磊,王同卫,钱晓楠. 组合后压浆对灌注桩承载力的增强作用研究. 中国水运(下半月). 2022(01): 139-141 .
![]() | |
15. |
晁鹏飞. 超大吨位灌注桩承载力试验及数值模型研究. 城市建筑. 2022(16): 159-163 .
![]() | |
16. |
王贵森,洪宝宁,孙东宁,邵志伟. 联合后注浆对群桩基础工程特性的影响. 公路. 2022(09): 203-211 .
![]() | |
17. |
王卿,李瑜,余奇异,胡涛. 洞庭湖地区桥梁组合压浆灌注桩竖向承载性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2497-2501 .
![]() | |
18. |
陈祉阳,龚维明,靳朋刘,朱建民,陈新奎. 基于分布式后压浆的灌注桩承载力试验研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(S2): 689-695 .
![]() | |
19. |
徐艺飞,万志辉,戴国亮,龚维明,高鲁超. 桩端后压浆灌注桩长期承载性能试验研究. 建筑结构学报. 2021(04): 139-146 .
![]() | |
20. |
邸洪江,余奇异,钱晓楠,胡涛. 高速公路桥梁大直径组合后压浆灌注桩自平衡试验研究. 中国水运(下半月). 2021(06): 131-133 .
![]() | |
21. |
秦鹏飞,王为林,袁媛. 岩土工程注浆技术与其应用研究. 地质与勘探. 2021(03): 631-639 .
![]() | |
22. |
叶新宇,彭锐,马新岩,张升,王善勇. 压密效应对新型压密注浆土钉的强化研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(09): 1649-1656+1738 .
![]() | |
23. |
薛振年,冯泓鸣,任晨宁,周志军. 黄土地区桥梁灌注桩桩侧-桩端联合压浆模型试验. 长安大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(06): 19-28 .
![]() | |
24. |
王灿,刘青,党智. 基于挠度的连续梁桥预应力损失分析. 中国水运. 2021(12): 154-156 .
![]() | |
25. |
杨纪,李孟然,黄毅,崔振华. 游荡型河道引桥桩基组合注浆工艺关键技术. 人民黄河. 2020(01): 117-120 .
![]() | |
26. |
万志辉,戴国亮,龚维明,竺明星,高鲁超. 不同成桩工艺对后压浆灌注桩承载特性影响的试验研究. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(02): 231-236 .
![]() | |
27. |
万志辉,戴国亮,高鲁超,龚维明. 大直径后压浆灌注桩承载力和沉降的实用计算方法研究. 岩土力学. 2020(08): 2746-2755 .
![]() | |
28. |
王丽锋,周长庚. 路面基床病害治理中高性能压浆材料的试验研究. 路基工程. 2019(03): 194-198+204 .
![]() | |
29. |
刘彦峰,胡晓明,马远刚,刘少成. 后注浆技术在粉细砂地层灌注桩中的应用. 桥梁建设. 2019(S1): 127-132 .
![]() |