Advanced Search
  • Indexed in Scopus
  • Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
  • Included in A Guide to the Core Journal of China
  • Indexed in Ei Compendex
Volume 41 Issue 9
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
CAO Zhen-zhong, Kyle M. Rollins, YUAN Xiao-ming, T. Leslie Youd, Michael Talbot, Jashod Roy, Sara Amoroso. Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006
Citation: CAO Zhen-zhong, Kyle M. Rollins, YUAN Xiao-ming, T. Leslie Youd, Michael Talbot, Jashod Roy, Sara Amoroso. Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006
shu

Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils

  • 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
    2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo 84602, USA;
    3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institution of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
    4. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Provo 84606, USA;
    5. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisicae Vulcanologia, L'Aquila 8-67100, Italy

More Information
  • Received Date: October 20, 2018
  • Published Date: September 24, 2019
    Abstract
  • The CYY formula, proposed by Cao, Youd and Yuan in 2013 and based on the field investigations of gravelly soil sites liquefied during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake using the Chinese dynamic penetration test (DPT), has uncertainty regarding applicability and reliability in practical use. Nevertheless, the DPT has obvious advantages in maneuverability and economy. In order to verify the reliability, accuracy and practicability of the CYY formula, 29 new gravelly soil sites in total, 26 of which are liquefied during 6 different earthquakes including the 1964 Alaska earthquake in America, the 1976 Friuli earthquake in Italy, the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake in America, the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China, the 2016 Muisne earthquake in Ecuador, and the 2016 Kaikora earthquake in New Zealand, are selected for China-U S joint borehole drilling and DPT. The field tests at 14 sites in the Chengdu Plain are mainly completed by the Chinese side, and the rest of tests are mainly completed by the US side led by Professor Rollins. The results indicate that the Chinese DPT is feasible in different countries and can effectively penetrate about 20 meters of gravelly soils, and the blow count of DPT can be used as the primary index for predicting the liquefaction of gravelly soils. The 26 selected liquefaction sites consist of soil profiles in undrained conditions
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    徐斌, 孔宪京, 邹德高, 等. 饱和砂砾料液化后应力与变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1): 103-106.
    (XU Bin, KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao, et al.Laboratory study on behaviour of static properties of saturated sand-gravel after liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 103-106. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    FIORAVANTE V, GIRETTI D, JAMIOLKOWSKI M, et al.Triaxial tests on undisturbed gravelly soils from the Sicilian shore of the Messina Strait[J]. Bull Earthquake Eng, 2012, 10: 1717-1744.
    [3]
    FLORA A, LIRER S, SILVESTRI F.Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 43: 366-379.
    [4]
    陈国兴, 孙田, 王炳辉, 等. 循环荷载作用下饱和砂砾土的破坏机理与动强度[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2148.
    (CHEN Guo-xing, SUN Tian, WANG Bing-hui, et al.Undrained cyclic failure mechanisms and resistance of saturated sand-grave mixtures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2148. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    WANG Yong, WANG Yan-li.Liquefaction characteristics of gravelly soil under cyclic loading with constant strain amplitude by experimental and numerical investigations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017(92): 388-396.
    [6]
    HARDER L F.Application of the Becker Penetration test for evaluating the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils[C]// Proc NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Engineering Research. Buffalo, NY, 1997: 129-148.
    [7]
    GHAFGHAZI M, DEJONG T J, STURM P, et al.Instrumented becker penetration test: II iBPT-SPT correlation for characterization and liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2017, 143(9): 04017063.
    [8]
    袁晓铭, 秦志光, 刘荟达, 等. 砾性土层液化的触发条件[J].岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 777-785.
    (YUAN Xiao-ming, QIN Zhi-guang, LIU Hui-da, et al.Necessary trigger conditions of liquefaction for gravelly soil layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 777-785. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    CAO Z, YOUD T, YUAN X.Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation in gravelly soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2013, 139(8): 1320-1333.
    [10]
    NIKOLAOU S, ZEKKOS D, ASSIMAKI D et al. January 26th/February 2nd 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Events[R]. GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, ASSIMAKI D et al. January 26th/February 2nd 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Events[R]. GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, http://www. geerassociation.org.
    [11]
    LOPEZ S, VERA-GRUNAUER X, ROLLINS K, et al.Gravelly soil liquefaction after the 2016 ecuador earthquake[C]// Procs Conf on Geotech Earthquake Engrg and Soil Dynamics. ASCE, Austin, Texas USA, 2018: 273-285.
    [12]
    BRADLEY B, COMERIO M, CUBRINOVSKI M, et al.M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand Earthquake on November 14, 2016M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand Earthquake on November 14, 2016[R]. QuakeCoRE-GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, http://www.geerassociation.org.
    [13]
    COULTER H W, MIGLIACCIO R R.Effect of the Earthquake of March 22, 1964 at Valdez. Alaska[R]. US: Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-C,1966.
    [14]
    SIROVICH L.Repetitive Liquefaction at gravelly site and liquefaction in overconsolidated sands[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(4): 23-34.
    [15]
    YOUD T L, HARP E L, KEEFER D K, et al.The Borah Peak, Idaho Earthquake of October 28, 1983 Liquefaction[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1985, 2(1): 71-89.
    [16]
    YOUD T L, IDRISS I M.Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2001, 127(10): 817-833.
    [17]
    ROLLINS K M, YOUD T L, TALBOT M.Evaluation of dynamic cone penetration test for liquefaction assessment of gravels from case histories in idaho[C]// Procs Conf on Geotech Earthquake Engrg and Soil Dynamics. ASCE, Austin, Texas USA, 2018: 227-236.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Youjun, ZHANG zhengxi, ZHANG Chao, LIU Tianyu, ZHANG Xu. Theoretical study on equivalent stiffness of F-type socket joints in rectangular pipe jacking tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 506-515. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231165
    [2]ZHONG Zilan, ZHANG Yabo, HOU Benwei, HAN Junyan, DU Xiuli. Seismic response analysis and damage assessment of urban water supply networks considering influences of crossing pipelines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(5): 964-975. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220201
    [3]YANG Xiao-hui, QIAN Bao, Guo Nan, DING Bao-yan, ZHANG Guo-hua. Influence factors and deformation laws of uneven settlement of a loess-filling foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 207-212. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1037
    [4]JIN Cong-cong, CHI Shi-chun, NIE Zhang-bo. Seismic safety analysis of high earth-rockfill dams based on seismic deformational fragility[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202002015
    [5]LIU Yu-yang, XIE Yong-li, LAI Hong-peng, ZHANG Hong-guang. Influence of foundation settlement on mechanical performance of shear keys of segment joints in immersed tube tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2235-2244. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201512013
    [6]ZHU He-hua, HUANG Bo-qi, LI Xiao-jun, HASHIMOTO Tadashi. Unified model for internal force and deformation of shield segment joints and experimental analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 2153-2160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412001
    [7]LIU Chengdong, MA Fuheng, DAI Qun. Application of wild value diagnosis technique in dam safety monitoring data analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(11): 1726-1728.
    [8]ZHAO Shangyi, ZHENG Yingren, SHI Weimin, WANG Jinglin. Analysis on safety factor of slope by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 343-346.
    [10]Tan Zhiming, Yao Zukang. Structural Analysis of Concrete Pavements on Soft Subsoils with Differential Settlements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 54-63.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李书亮, 李科, 郭鸿雁, 陈建忠. 基于SSA-LSTM-WNN的沉管隧道接头张合预测. 地下空间与工程学报. 2025(05)
    2. 孙超，张光伟，答武强，余祖峰. 某沉管隧道病害分析及处置措施构思. 隧道建设(中英文). 2025(02): 415-424 .
    3. 仉文岗，唐学成，刘汉龙，杨文钰，刘智成，王鲁琦，李红蕊. 静-动荷载作用下欠固结软土盾构隧道长期沉降与最优埋深计算方法. 隧道建设(中英文). 2024(09): 1829-1840 .
    4. 刘剑，金耀，朱小明. 沉管隧道运营期健康监测技术研究及应用. 公路. 2024(10): 437-442 .
    5. 王延宁，周桓竹，俞缙. 沉管隧道运维期回淤影响下的长期沉降模型. 岩土工程学报. 2023(02): 292-300 . 本站查看
    6. 王延宁，周桓竹，郑俊杰. 考虑地基性状时间变化的沉管隧道变形分析. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(09): 3453-3462 .
    7. 姬海，宋神友，徐国平，黄清飞，邓斌. 钢壳混凝土沉管抗剪连接件力学特性研究. 公路. 2023(09): 427-438 .
    8. 周桓竹，王延宁，寇晓强. 考虑潮汐荷载作用的沉管隧道竖向位移计算. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2022(03): 790-797 .
    9. WANG Yan-ning，ZHOU Huan-zhu，WANG Le-chen. Settlement Mode Analysis for An Immersed Tube Tunnel Considering A Nonuniform Foundation Under Tidal Load. China Ocean Engineering. 2022(03): 427-438 .
    10. 丁浩，景强，闫禹，张娜，李旺林. 沉管隧道运维技术发展现状综述. 中国公路学报. 2022(10): 1-12 .
    11. 谢雄耀，张乃元，周彪，王晓佳. 滨海软土沉管隧道结构性能演化规律及成因分析. 工业建筑. 2021(07): 1-5+24 .
    12. 张文春，李承航. 深基坑及周边建筑物的沉降监测实例分析. 北方建筑. 2020(03): 8-12 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Sara Amoroso

    • 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
      2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo 84602, USA;
      3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institution of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
      4. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Provo 84606, USA;
      5. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisicae Vulcanologia, L'Aquila 8-67100, Italy

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (419) PDF downloads (216) Cited by(21)
    Related
    Website Copyright © 2010 Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：No.34 Hujuguan, Nanjing 210024, ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：+86-25-85829534, 85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return