• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
BAO Xiao-hua, FU Yan-bin, HUANG Hong-wei. Case study of risk assessment for safe grade of deep excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk1): 192-197. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S1033
Citation: BAO Xiao-hua, FU Yan-bin, HUANG Hong-wei. Case study of risk assessment for safe grade of deep excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk1): 192-197. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S1033

Case study of risk assessment for safe grade of deep excavations

More Information
  • Received Date: July 27, 2014
  • Published Date: July 27, 2014
  • Based on the risk idea and the safe factors of excavations as well as the weights obtained from the investigations of excavation accidents, the safe grade of excavations is analyzed. First, the development situation, possible risks in the project and the current grade division in excavations are briefly introduced. Then all kinds of reasons obtained from a large number of excavation accidents are statistically analyzed. Each influence factor in excavation safety and its weight are obtained. The fuzzy synthetic evaluation method is introduced, which can be used largely in many projects. At the same time, the judgment matrix is constructed and two levels of judgment for the excavation safety are carried out. Quantitative calculations are made by using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Finally, the excavation project of Shanghai International Passenger Transport Centre is analyzed. The results conform to the actual situations of the project. Thus the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method is favorable for raising the overall safety level of the excavation, and it can provide some reference values for projects.
  • [1]
    黄宏伟, 边亦海. 深基坑工程施工中的风险管理[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(4): 611-614. (HUANG Hong-wei, BIAN Yi-hai. Risk management in deep excavation construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(4): 611-614. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    王 岩, 黄宏伟. 地铁区间隧道安全评估的层次——模糊综合评判法[J]. 地下空间, 2004, 24(3): 301-305. (WANG Yan, HUANG Hong-wei. Hierarchy——fuzzy synthetic safety evaluation method of tunnel in subway[J]. Journal of Underground Space, 2004, 24(3): 301-305. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    SOREN D E, PER T, JORGEN K. Guidelines for tunneling risk management: International Tunneling Association, working group No2[J]. Tunnel and Underground Space Technology, 2004(19): 217-237.
    [4]
    陈 龙, 黄宏伟. 岩石隧道工程风险分析浅析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(1): 110-115. (CHEN Long, HUANG Hong-wei. Risk analysis of rock tunnel engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(1): 110-115. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    SZ—08—2000 上海地铁基坑工程施工规范[S]. 2000. (SZ—08—2000 Specification for excavation in Shanghai metro construction[S]. 2000. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    郭仲伟. 风险分析与决策. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1986: 1-45. (GUO Zhong-wei. Risk analysis and decision. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1986: 1-45. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    边亦海, 黄宏伟, 李 剑. 可信性方法在深基坑施工期风险分析中的应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 1(2): 70-73. (BIAN Yi-hai, HUANG Hong-wei, LI Jian. Risk analysis in the construction stage of deep excavation engineering based on dependability method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 1(2): 70-73. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    闫玉茹, 黄宏伟, 胡群芳, 等. 大连湾海底隧道钻爆法施工风险评估研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增刊2): 3616-3624. (YAN Yu-ru, HUANG Hong-wei, HU Qun-fang, et al. Risk assessment on drill and blasting method of Dalian bay subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S2): 3616-3624. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    朱合华, 闫治国, 李向阳, 等. 饱和软土地层中管幕法隧道施工风险分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(增刊2): 5549-5554. (ZHU He-hua, YAN Zhi-guo, LI Xiang-yang, et al. Analysis of construction risks for pipe-roofing tunnel in saturated soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(S2): 5549-5554. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    陈晓勇, 高广运, 李 伟. 深基坑支护结构的风险分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(2): 1794-1798. (CHEN Xiao-yong, GAO Guang-yun, LI Wei. The risk analysis of retaining structure in deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(2): 1794-1798. (in Chinese))
  • Related Articles

    [1]DU Xiu-li, ZHANG Xue-feng, ZHANG Ming-ju, HOU Ben-wei. Risk synthetic assessment for deep pit construction based on evidence theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(1): 155-161. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201401015
    [2]XIN Xin, WAN Peng, SHEN Yuan-shun. Risk assessment of construction of excavations in areas of rock and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 342-346.
    [3]WANG Ming-wu, CHEN Guang-yi, JIN Ju-liang. Risk evaluation of surrounding rock stability based on stochastic simulation of multi-element connection number and triangular fuzzy numbers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 643.
    [4]Interval fuzzy judgment method for roadbed stability in karst area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1).
    [5]LAN Shouqi, ZHANG Qinghe. Risk assessment of deep excavation during construction based on fuzzy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 648-652.
    [6]CAO Wengui, ZHANG Yongjie, ZHAO Minghua. Study on interval relative fuzzy optimization method to determinine support schemes for foundation pits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(1): 66-71.
    [7]ZHENG Mingxin, YIN Zongze, WU Jimin, DU Yufei, LUAN Yu. Post-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of effectiveness of landslide control[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(10): 1224-1229.
    [8]Huang Wei, Zhong Li, Qian Zhendong. Fuzzy judgment about the grade of shrink and expansion for the expansive soil in the subgrade[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(4): 408-413.
    [10]Su Jingyu, Zhou Xiyuan, Tan Jian. Practical Methods of Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation for Site Classification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 12(3): 32-41.

Catalog

    Article views (491) PDF downloads (550) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return