考虑板土相互作用的排水板通水特性试验研究

朱群峰; 高长胜; 占鑫杰; 张凌; 杨守华; 明经平

doi:10.11779/CJGE201712002

考虑板土相互作用的排水板通水特性试验研究 English Version

朱群峰^1,2,
高长胜^1,2,
占鑫杰^1,2, ,,
张凌^1,2,
杨守华^1,2,
明经平^1,2

1. 南京水利科学研究院,江苏南京 210024;
2. 水文水资源与水利工程国家重点试验室,江苏南京 210029

基金项目: 水利部公益性行业科研专项经费资助项目（201401006）; 南京水利科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目（Y316004,Y317007）; 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验开放基金（2017P02）

详细信息

作者简介:
朱群峰(1966- ),男,湖北罗田人,教授级高级工程师。主要从事软基处理咨询、设计、监测及科研工作。E-mail: qfzhu@nhri.cn。

通讯作者:
占鑫杰，E-mail：xjzhan@nhri.cn

中图分类号: TU411
计量
- 文章访问数: 0249
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0269
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-10-25
- 发布日期: 2017-12-24

Experimental study on discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drain considering interaction of PVD and soil

1.Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210029, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究排水板在实际工况下的通水特性,研制排水板纵向通水量测试新仪器,采用室内真空预压模型试验、堆载预压模型试验和直接充灌淤泥等方法来制作板土单元体（试样）,并开展板土单元体（试样）通水能力测试。试验结果表明：无论是直接充灌淤泥法、堆载预压法还是真空预压法,高性能排水板通水量均大于现行规程试验结果,而普通排水板通水量均小于现行规程试验结果,现行规程方法高估了真空预压后普通排水板的通水能力。对比结果表明：高性能排水板在堆载预压后通水能力与真空预压后通水能力接近,而普通排水板在堆载预压后通水能力明显高于真空预压后通水能力。因此,对于变形大且固结时间长的新近吹填淤泥地基加固工程应优先选用高性能排水板。
- 高性能排水板 /
- 普通排水板 /
- 通水量测试新仪器 /
- 板土单元体 /
- 模型试验
Abstract: In order to study the practical discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drain (PVD), a new apparatus is developed. The laboratory vacuum preloading model tests, surcharge preloading model tests and direct filling tests are used to produce the PVD-soil element samples, and the discharge capacity measurements of PVD-soil element samples are conducted. The test results show that regardless of using the direct filling tests, laboratory vacuum preloading tests and surcharge preloading tests, the discharge capacity of high-performance PVD is higher than that measured by the current specification, and that of the traditional PVD is lower than the value measured by the current specification. The results by the current specification overestimate the discharge capacity of the traditional PVD under vacuum preloading. The comparative test results reveal that the discharge capacity of the high-performance PVD under surcharge preloading is close to that under vacuum preloading, and the discharge capacity of the traditional PVD under surcharge preloading is higher than that under vacuum preloading. Therefore, for the newly dredged soft soil reinforcement project, when the settlement of soil is large and the consolidation period is long, the high-performance PVD should be preferred.
- high-performance PVD /
- traditional PVD /
- new apparatus for discharge capacity measurement /
- element of PVD and soil /
- model test

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[1]	赵维炳, 刘家豪, 高长胜, 等. 工程排水加固技术发展现状与展望[C]// 第六届全国工程排水与加固技术研讨会. 南京, 2005: 1-11. (ZHAO Wei-bin, LIU Jia-hao, GAO Chang-sheng, et al. Present situation and prospect of practice of drainage and reinforcement engineering[C]// Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Drainage and Improvement Engineering. Nanjing, 2005: 1-11. (in Chinese))
[2]	刘家豪. 塑料板排水法加固软土地基技术的发展[C]// 第四届塑料板排水法加固软基技术研讨会. 广州, 1999: 1-7. (LIU Jia-hao. Development of drainage and improvement method on soft soil[C]// Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Weak Ground Improvement Using Prefabricated Drains. Guangzhou, 1999: 1-7. (in Chinese))
[3]	杨明昌. 塑料排水板6年检测资料的统计与分析[C]// 第七届塑料板排水法加固软基技术研讨会. 深圳, 2008: 167-171. (YANG Ming-chan. Statistics and analysis on detection data of prefabricated vertical drain of 6 year[C]// Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Drainage and Improvement Engineering. Shenzhen, 2008: 167-171. (in Chinese))
[4]	乐超, 徐超, 吴雪峰, 等. 两种塑料排水板滤膜淤堵特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(9): 2529-2534. (LE Chao, XU Chao, WU Xue-feng, et al. Experimental research on clogging characteristics of two types of PVD filters[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(9): 2529-2534. (in Chinese))
[5]	JTS 206—1—2009 水运工程塑料排水板应用技术规程[S]. 2009. (JTS 206—1—2009 Technical specification for application of plastic drainboard for port and waterway engineering[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))
[6]	高长胜, 朱群峰. 高性能塑料排水板通水性能模型试验研究[R]. 南京: 南京水利科学研究院, 2014: 1-42. (GAO Chang-sheng, ZHU Qun-feng. Model test on discharge capacity of high performance prefabricated vertical drain[R]. Nanjing: Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, 2014: 1-42. (in Chinese))
[7]	SL 235—2012 土工合成材料测试规程[S]. 2012. (SL 235—2012 Specification for test and measurement of geosynthetics[S]. 2012. (in Chinese))
[8]	JEONG Y, LEE S. Flow capacity reduction of prefabricated vertical drain by kinking deformation[C]// Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Lisbon, 2007: 1315-1319.
[9]	俞炯奇, 孙伯永. 长期在地下工作后的塑料排水板的性能研究[J]. 水利学报, 2007(增刊): 711-715. (YU Jiong-qi, SUN Bo-yong. The capacity of prefabricated strip drains after application in the soft soil foundation for a long time[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007(S0): 711-715. (in Chinese))
[10]	闫澍旺, 孙立强, 李伟, 等. 真空加固超软土工艺的室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(3): 341-347. (YAN Shu-wang, SUN Li-qiang, LI Wei, et al. Model tests on vacuum preloading technology of super-soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(3): 341-347. (in Chinese))
[11]	孙立强, 闫澍旺, 李伟, 等. 超软土真空预压室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(4): 984-990. (SUN Li-qiang, YAN Shu-wang, LI Wei, et al. Study of super-soft soil vacuum preloading model test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(4): 984-990. (in Chinese))