泥炭质土层盾构施工扰动引起隧道长期沉降的研究

王志良; 瞿嘉安; 申林方; 徐则民; 丁祖德

doi:10.11779/CJGE201708008

泥炭质土层盾构施工扰动引起隧道长期沉降的研究 English Version

昆明理工大学建筑工程学院,云南昆明 650500

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51408284,U1502231,51508253）

详细信息

作者简介:
王志良(1982- ),男,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下建筑工程方面的教学和科研。E-mail: wangzhiliangtj@126.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 374
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 264
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-04-28
- 发布日期: 2017-08-24

Long-term settlement of tunnel caused by shield tunneling in peaty soil

Faculty of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究泥炭质土层盾构施工扰动引起隧道的长期沉降问题,将隧道周围土体视为连续、均质、各向同性的饱和黏弹性介质,采用五元件模型描述泥炭质土的流变特性,耦合Terzaghi-Rendulic二维固结理论,建立了隧道衬砌在完全不透水的情况下,盾构施工扰动引起周围土体超孔隙水压力消散的控制方程。采用分离变量法、保角映射、Laplace变换及逆变换等数学方法对该控制方程进行求解,得到了隧道周围土体超孔隙水压力消散的解析解,最后对土体的竖向应变进行积分获得了隧道长期沉降的计算公式。结合一工程算例分析了昆明泥炭质土层超孔隙水压力消散及隧道长期沉降的变化规律,研究结果表明：与上海软黏土相比,在初始阶段泥炭质土层中超孔隙水压力的消散速度较快,然后迅速变缓并趋于稳定。泥炭质土层中隧道的长期沉降持续时间更长且沉降量更大,在900 d的时间内隧道沉降趋于稳定,其累积沉降量约高达150 mm。此外,昆明泥炭质土的流变特性显著,如将土体中超孔隙水压力消散90%作为主固结沉降的完成时刻,则土体次固结沉降约占隧道总沉降量的36%,是隧道长期沉降中不可忽视的一个重要组成部分。
- 泥炭质土 /
- 盾构隧道 /
- 施工扰动 /
- 长期沉降
Abstract: In order to study the long-term settlement of tunnel caused by shield tunneling in peaty soil, the surrounding soil of tunnel is regarded as continuum, homogeneous and isotropic saturated viscoelastic medium. The rheological properties of peaty soil are described a five-component model. Based on the Terzaghi-Rendulic theory of two-dimensional consolidation, the governing equation for dissipation of the excess pore water pressure are established when the lining is impermeable. The equations are solved using the mathematical methods of separating variables, conformal mapping, Laplace transform and inverse transform, and the analytical solution of the dissipation of excess pore water pressure is obtained. Finally, the vertical strain of soil is integrated to get the formula for long-term settlement of tunnel. The variation laws of the disspation of excess pore water pressure and long-term settlement of tunnel in peaty soil are analyzed through an example. The results show that in the initial stage, the dissipating speed of the excess pore water pressure is faster than that in soft clay in Shanghai, and then it becomes slow and steady. The lasting time of long-term settlement is longer and the settlement amount is larger in the peaty soil. The tunnel settlement tends to be stable in 900 days, and the cumulative settlement is almost up to 150 mm. In addition, the rheological properties of peaty soil in Kunming are significant; if the excess pore water pressure is dissipated by 90% as the completion time of the primary consolidation settlement, the secondary consolidation settlement accounting for about 36% of the total settlement of tunnel is an important part of the long-term settlement of tunnel.
- peaty soil /
- shield tunnel /
- construction disturbance /
- long-term settlement

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	SHEN Shui-long, WU Huai-na, CUI Yu-jun, et al. Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai[J]．Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40(3): 309-323.
[2]	NG C W W, LIU Guo-bin, LI Qing. Investigation of the long-term tunnel settlement mechanism of the first metro line in Shanghai[J]．Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(6): 674-684.
[3]	刘建航, 侯学渊. 盾构法隧道[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社,1991. (LIU Jian-hang, HOU Xue-yuan. Shield tunnel[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 1991. (in Chinese))
[4]	蒋忠信. 滇池泥炭土[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1994. (JIANG Zhong-xin. Dianchi peaty soil[M]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 1994. (in Chinese))
[5]	阮永芬, 刘岳东, 王东, 等. 昆明泥炭土与泥炭质土对建筑地基的影响[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(理工版), 2003, 28(3): 121-124. (RUAN Yong-fen, LIU Yue-dong, WANG Dong, et al. Effect of Kunming’s peat & peaty soil on the building foundation[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Science and Technology) , 2003, 28(3): 121-124. (in Chinese))
[6]	熊恩来, 阮永芬, 刘文连, 等. 云南泥炭土力学特征实验及归一化性状研究[J]. 云南水力发电, 2005, 21(2): 39-41. (XIONG En-lai, RUAN Yong-fen, LIU Wen-lian, et al. Mechanical testing of Yunnan’s peat soil and study of its generalized behavior[J]. Yunnan Water Power, 2005, 21(2): 39-41. (in Chinese))
[7]	桂跃, 余志华, 刘海明, 等. 高原湖相泥炭土次固结特征及机理分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(8): 1390-1398. (GUI Yue, YU Zhi-hua, LIU Hai-ming, et al. Secondary consolidation properties and mechanism of plateau lacustrine peaty soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(8): 1390-1398. (in Chinese))
[8]	吕俊青. 昆明盆地泥炭土流变特性与本构模型研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2011. (LÜ Jun-qing. Study of rheological characteristics and constitutive model of peaty soil in Kunming Basin[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2011. (in Chinese))
[9]	LEE K M, JI H W, SHEN C K, et al. Ground response to the construction of Shanghai Metro tunnel-line 2[J]. Soils and Foundation, 1999, 39(3): 113-134.
[10]	张忠苗, 林存刚, 吴世明, 等. 泥水盾构施工引起的地面固结沉降实例研究[J]. 浙江大学学报（工学版）, 2012, 46(3): 431-440. (ZHANG Zhong-miao, LIN Cun-gang, WU Shi-ming, et at. Case study of ground surface consolidation settlements induced by slurry shield tunnelling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2012, 46(3): 431-440. (in Chinese))
[11]	WONGSAROJ J, SOGA K, MAIR R J. Modeling of long-term ground response to tunneling under St James’s Park, London[J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(1): 75-90.
[12]	SHIN J H, ADDENBROOKE T I, POTTS D M．A numerical study of the effect of groundwater movement on long-term tunnel behaviour[J]. Géotechnique, 2002, 52(6): 391-403.
[13]	杨敏, 黄炬, 孙庆, 等. 黏土中隧道开挖引起的地表及地表以下土体长期沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(2): 217-221. (YANG Min, HUANG Ju, SUN Qing, et al. Computation method for long-term surface and subsurface settlements induced by excavation of tunnels in clays[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(2): 217-221. (in Chinese))
[14]	詹美礼, 钱家欢. 黏弹性地基中洞周土体固结问题的解析解[J]. 河海大学学报, 1993, 21(2): 54-60. (ZHEN Mei-li, QIAN Jia-huan. Theoretical analysis for consolidation of viscoelastic clay about circular tunnels in foundations[J]. Journal of Hohai University, 1993, 21(2): 54-60. (in Chinese))
[15]	张冬梅, 黄宏伟, 王箭明. 软土隧道地表长期沉降的黏弹性流变与固结耦合分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(增刊1): 2359-2362. (ZHANG Dong-mei, HUANG Hong-wei, WANG Jian-ming. Analysis of long-term settlements over tunnels using visco-elastic constitutive model coupled with consolidation theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(S1): 2359-2362. (in Chinese))
[16]	包鹤立. 衬砌局部渗漏条件下软土盾构隧道的长期性态研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008. (BAO He-li. Research on the long-term behavior of shield tunnel with partially sealed linings in soft soil[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008. (in Chinese))
[17]	童磊. 软土浅埋隧道变形、渗流及固结性状研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010. (TONG Lei. Studies on land subsidence, seepage field and consolidation behavior of soft soil around a shallow circular tunnel[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010. (in Chinese))
[18]	刘晨晖, 杨敏, 孙庆, 等. 圆形盾构隧道开挖引起的黏土长期沉降理论解[J]. 同济大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 43(7): 1000-1007. (LIU Chen-hui, YANG Min, SUN Qing, et al. Theoretical solutions for shield tunneling induced long-term settlement in clays[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(7): 1000-1007. (in Chinese))
[19]	傅作新. 工程徐变力学[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1985. (FU Zuo-xin. Engineering creep mechanics[M]. Beijing: Water Conservancy and Electric Power Press, 1985. (in Chinese))