• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

多刀盘土压平衡矩形顶管隧道土体改良试验研究

许有俊, 文中坤, 闫履顺, 白雪光, 刘忻梅

许有俊, 文中坤, 闫履顺, 白雪光, 刘忻梅. 多刀盘土压平衡矩形顶管隧道土体改良试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 288-296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602012
引用本文: 许有俊, 文中坤, 闫履顺, 白雪光, 刘忻梅. 多刀盘土压平衡矩形顶管隧道土体改良试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 288-296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602012
XU You-jun, WEN Zhong-kun, YAN Lü-shun, BAI Xue-guang, LIU Xin-mei. Experimental study on soil improvement during construction of EPB rectangular pipe jacking with multi-cutter[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 288-296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602012
Citation: XU You-jun, WEN Zhong-kun, YAN Lü-shun, BAI Xue-guang, LIU Xin-mei. Experimental study on soil improvement during construction of EPB rectangular pipe jacking with multi-cutter[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 288-296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602012

多刀盘土压平衡矩形顶管隧道土体改良试验研究  English Version

基金项目: 内蒙古自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目(NJZY14167); 内蒙古科技大学“产、学、研”基金项目(PY—201206)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    许有俊(1979- ),男,内蒙古巴彦淖尔人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事隧道、地下工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: xyoujun@163.com。

Experimental study on soil improvement during construction of EPB rectangular pipe jacking with multi-cutter

  • 摘要: 采用土压平衡矩形顶管施工的内蒙古科技大学地下通道处于砂性土地层中,分别采用了加水与加聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)溶液+粉土泥浆的土体改良方法,土体改良效果不理想,机头刀盘闭塞、结饼现象严重,实际顶进速度仅为1.5 mm/min;在此基础上,采用现场监控量测、室内试验等研究手段,对原土体改良方案进行了室内优化,确定出PAM溶液最佳浓度为2 g/L,膨润土泥浆质量浓度为9%较为合理,添加剂的最佳配比为泥浆注入比为12%,PAM溶液注入比为17%;采用优化后的土体改良配比方案,顶进速度提升至2.8 mm/min,地表沉降监测值均未超过控制标准,能够满足矩形顶管施工的要求。
    Abstract: The rectangular pipe jacking method is applied in the underground passage project situated in the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology under the condition of sandy stratum. The soil improvement effects are unsatisfactory by using the methods of adding water and the two materials of PAM solution and silt mud. The cutter head is seriously blocked, and the actual jacking speed is only 1.5 mm/min. Therefore, such methods as monitoring measurements and laboratory tests are used to optimize the old soil improvement plan. The research results are as follows: Firstly, the best concentration of PAM water solution is 2 g/L, and the better mass concentration of bentonite mud is 9%; Secondly, the best proportion of additive is that the injection ratio of slurry is 12% and that of PAM water solution is 17%; Thirdly, the jacking speed increases to 2.8 mm/min by using the optimized soil improvement plan, and at the same time, the ground settlement value does not exceed the control standard. The proposed soil improvement method can meet the requirements of rectangular pipe jacking construction.
  • [1] 魏 纲, 魏新江, 徐日庆. 顶管工程技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2011. (WEI Gang, WEI Xin-jiang, XU Ri-qing. Pipe jacking engineering technique[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2011. (in Chinese))
    [2] 宋克志, 汪 波, 孔 恒, 等. 无水砂卵石地层土压盾构施工泡沫技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(13): 2327-2332. (SONG Ke-zhi, WANG Bo, KONG Heng, et al. Study on foam technology during shield excavation in sandy cobble bed without water[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(13): 2327-2332. (in Chinese))
    [3] 汪国峰. 北京地铁十号线土压平衡盾构土体改良技术应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2009, 46(4): 77-82. (WANG Guo-feng. Soil improvement technologies and implementation for EPB shield in Beijing subway line 10[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2009, 46(4): 77-82. (in Chinese))
    [4] 朱 伟. 隧道标准规范(盾构篇)及解说[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001. (ZHU Wei. Japanese standard for shield tunneling[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2001. (in Chinese))
    [5] 张国京, 刘 盈. 土压平衡盾构施工中土的塑流、化技术[J]. 市政技术, 2005, 23(5): 293-296. (ZHANG Guo-jing, LIU Ying. Soil plasticizing technique for epb shield excavation[J]. Municipal Engineering Technology, 2005, 23(5): 293-296. (in Chinese))
    [6] BARTAK J, HRDINA I, ROMANCOV G, et al. Integral studies on mechanical functions of mudding agents and the properties of modified soils in the EPB shield tunneling technology[C]// Underground Space——the 4th Dimension on Metropolises, Prague, Taylor & Francis Group. London, 2007: 1153-1159.
    [7] 魏康林. 土压平衡盾构施工中泡沫和膨润土改良土体的微观机理分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2007, 44(1): 73-77. (WEI Kang-lin. Micro-mechanism analysis for the soil improvement by foam and bentonite in EPB shield tunnelling[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2007, 44(1): 73-77. (in Chinese))
    [8] 胡晓波, 吕智英, 曾 涛. PAS与增稠保水剂复掺对水泥净浆性能的影响[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2006, 3(1): 60-64. (HU Xiao-bo, LÜ Zhi-ying, ZENG Tao. Influence of the compound of aminosufonic acid-based super plasticzer and water-retentive and thickening admixtures on cement paste properties[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2006, 3(1): 60-64. (in Chinese))
    [9] 王春婷, 隆 威. 大口径长距离顶管工程泥浆配方试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2014, 11(1): 106-111. (WANG Chun-ting, LONG Wei. Experimental study on the slurry formulation used for the large diameter long distance pipe_jacking project[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2014, 11(1): 106-111. (in Chinese))
    [10] 纪 鹏. 超长管道顶管用润滑减阻护壁泥浆系统的研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010. (JI Peng. Study on the lubricating and resistance-reducing wall-protecting slurry system usd for ultra-long pipe jacking[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2010. (in Chinese))
    [11] 姜厚停, 龚秋明, 杜修力. 卵石地层土压平衡盾构施工土体改良试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(2): 284-291. (JIANG Hong-ting, GONG Qiu-ming, DU Xiu-li. Experimental study on soil conditioning in cobble layer by use of earth pressure balanced machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 284-291. (in Chinese))
    [12] MIGUEL P. Soil conditioning for sand[J]. Tunnels and Tunnelling International, 2003(7): 40-42.
    [13] RAFFAELE V, CKAUDIO O I, DANIELE P. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: a laboratory research[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 308-31.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  345
  • HTML全文浏览量:  11
  • PDF下载量:  366
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-02
  • 发布日期:  2016-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回