• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HAO Zhi-chao, SHEN Yu-peng, ZHANG Yao-yu. Comparative studies on treatment effects of new methods for dredger fill foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 579-583.
Citation: HAO Zhi-chao, SHEN Yu-peng, ZHANG Yao-yu. Comparative studies on treatment effects of new methods for dredger fill foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 579-583.

Comparative studies on treatment effects of new methods for dredger fill foundation

More Information
  • Received Date: July 16, 2013
  • Published Date: November 24, 2013
  • On account of a long-term observation of subgrade subsidence after construction in a certain coastal dredger fill region and Subsidence prediction using hyperbolic fitting method, the measured settlement and predicting subsidence of High vacuum compaction method and Board ground stability technique were analyzed. The results show that the average measured final settlement is 53 mm and 61 mm respectively, predicting subsidence was between 100 mm to 150 mm. Two kinds of method can better control post-construction settlement, but High vacuum compaction method processed sections are smaller and faster to post-construction settlement. in terms of Cost ,high vacuum tight treatment cost about 85 Yuan/m2 of 6 m depth, the Board ground stability technique of 80 cm cost reaches 80 Yuan/m2, It shows that the High vacuum compaction method treatment effect has more advantages on the post-construction settlement, treatment depth, the processing cost and so on, and is more suitable for popularization and application in the region.
  • [1]
    马茂军. 板体地基稳定和高真空击密技术在曹妃甸工业区吹填砂路基处理中的应用比较[C]// 企业科技与发展, 2010: 79-89. (MA Mao-jun. The Comparison between the Applications of Board Ground Stability and High Vacuum Compact Technique in Cao Feidian Industrial Zone's Hydraulic Sand Reclamation Roadbed Treatments[C]// Enterprise Science And Technology &Development, 2010: 79-89 (in Chinese))
    [2]
    周焕云. 高速公路软基处理效果评价及选型策略研究[D].南京: 东南大学, 2003. (ZHOU Huan-yun. Study of expressway soft groud treatment chosing[D]. Nanjing: Southeast Univercity, 2003. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    吴价城, 武亚军, 吴名江. 高真空击密法—一种软土地基处理新工艺[J]. 地球与环境, 2005(50): 496-501. (WU Jia-cheng, WU Ya-jun, WU Ming-jiang. A high vacuum soil compact method -a new technology for soft soil improvement[J]. Earth and Envirenment, 2005(50): 496-501. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    徐士龙, 楼晓明, 刘敦敏, 等. 高真空击密法加固堆场地基的试验研究[C]// 第9届土力学与岩土工程学术会议论文.北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003: 736-739. (XU Shi-long, LOU Xiao-ming, LIU Dun-min, et al. Study of high vacuum compaction in consolidating stock dump foundation[C]// The 9th Soil Mechanics Geotechnical & Engineering Academic Conference Papers. Beijing: Tsinghua Univercity Press, 2003: 736-739. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    李中山. ALLU地基稳定处理系统在吹填砂路基中的应用[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2009, 32(1): 47-49. (LI Zhong-shan. Application of ALLU Foundation stabilization system in dredger fill region subgrade[J]. Heilongjiang Jiaotong Keji, 2009, 32(1): 47-49. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    赵洪波. 高速公路软土路基沉降预测[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(增刊1): 1168-1170. (ZHAO Hong-bo. Settlement prediction of highway soft foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(S1) : 1168-1170. (in Chinese))

Catalog

    Article views (286) PDF downloads (261) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return