Probabilistic density evolution analysis of dynamic response of tunnels under stochastic earthquakes

ZHANG Dongmei; GUO Li; SHEN Yiyao; HUANG Zhongkai

doi:10.11779/CJGE2024S20033

Volume 46 Issue S2

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2024 > 46(S2): 21-25, 37. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20033

ZHANG Dongmei, GUO Li, SHEN Yiyao, HUANG Zhongkai. Probabilistic density evolution analysis of dynamic response of tunnels under stochastic earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 21-25, 37. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20033

Citation:

PDF (1897 KB)

Probabilistic density evolution analysis of dynamic response of tunnels under stochastic earthquakes

1.
College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2.
College of Civil Engineering and Water Resoures, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China

More Information

Received Date: June 20, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Due to the stochastic characteristics of ground motion, it is difficult for the deterministic method to completely consider the complex stochastic characteristics of ground motion. It is of great practical significance to study the seismic response of tunnel structures by using the stochastic analysis method for the seismic design of underground structures. In this study, the research object is a typical circular tunnel structure in soft soils. First, a nonlinear interaction analysis model for the underground soil tunnel in a typical project site is established. Then, a random seismic model is used to generate a non-stationary seism that matches the requirements of the seismic design code. A probability density evolution analysis method is introduced into the seismic analysis of the tunnel structure, which initially explores the evolution characteristics of the probability density of its seismic performance. Using the tunnel inclination angle as the seismic performance index, the probability density function of the tunnel structural response is solved by using the probability density evolution method, and the exceedance probabilities of the tunnel inclination angle are obtained when the tunnel has no damage, slight damage, moderate damage and severe damage. The results show that the exceedance probabilities of the tunnel inclination angle in the four damage states are 98.88%, 86.10%, 30.90% and 3.70%, respectively. The proposed probability density evolution method can accurately obtain the instantaneous probability information of the tunnel inclination angle, and provide a new prospect for the study on the probability evolution characteristics of seismic performance of the tunnel structures.
- tunnel structure,
- probability density evolution method,
- stochastic earthquake,
- dynamic response,
- exceedance probability

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	何川, 李林, 张景, 等. 隧道穿越断层破碎带震害机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(3): 427-434. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201403004 HE Chuan, LI Lin, ZHANG Jing, et al. Seismic damage mechanism of tunnels through fault zones[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(3): 427-434. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201403004
[2]	高波, 王峥峥, 袁松, 等. 汶川地震公路隧道震害启示[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2009, 44(3): 336-341, 374. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.03.005 GAO Bo, WANG Zhengzheng, YUAN Song, et al. Lessons learnt from damage of highway tunnels in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 44(3): 336-341, 374. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.03.005
[3]	HUANG Z K, PITILAKIS K, ARGYROUDIS S, et al. Selection of optimal intensity measures for fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 145: 106724. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106724
[4]	汪振. 跨活动断裂带岩体隧道抗错断措施及其减灾效果与机理研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2022. WANG Zhen. Study on anti-fault measures and disaster reduction effect and mechanism of rock tunnel across active fault zone[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
[5]	LI J, CHEN J B. The principle of preservation of probability and the generalized density evolution equation[J]. Structural Safety, 2008, 30(1): 65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.08.001
[6]	LI J, CHEN J B. Stochastic Dynamics of Structures[M]. Newyork: Wiley, 2009.
[7]	孔宪京, 庞锐, 徐斌, 等. 考虑堆石料软化的坝坡随机地震动力稳定分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(3): 414-421. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201903002 KONG Xianjing, PANG Rui, XU Bin, et al. Stochastic seismic stability analysis of dam slopes considering softening of rockfills[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(3): 414-421. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201903002
[8]	HUANG Y, XIONG M. Dynamic reliability analysis of slopes based on the probability density evolution method[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 94: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.011
[9]	徐斌, 陈柯好, 王星亮, 等. 液化土中管道随机地震响应分析与可靠度评价研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(1): 81-89. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20221096 XU Bin, CHEN Kehao, WANG Xingliang, et al. Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability evaluation of pipelines in liquefied soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 81-89. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE20221096
[10]	李杰, 艾晓秋. 基于物理的随机地震动模型研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(5): 21-26. LI Jie, AI Xiaoqiu. Study on random model of earthquake ground motion based on physical process[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2006, 26(5): 21-26. (in Chinese)
[11]	PENG Y B, MEI Z, LI J. Stochastic seismic response analysis and reliability assessment of passively damped structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2014, 20(15): 2352-2365. doi: 10.1177/1077546313486910
[12]	CHEN J B, LI J. Stochastic seismic response analysis of structures exhibiting high nonlinearity[J]. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(7/8): 395-412.
[13]	ISHIBASHI I, ZHANG X J. Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1993, 33(1): 182-191. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.33.182
[14]	ANASTASOPOULOS I, GEORGARAKOS T, GEORGIANNOU V, et al. Seismic performance of bar-mat reinforced-soil retaining wall: Shaking table testing versus numerical analysis with modified kinematic hardening constitutive model[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 1089-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.020
[15]	ANASTASOPOULOS I, GELAGOTI F, KOURKOULIS R, et al. Simplified constitutive model for simulation of cyclic response of shallow foundations: validation against laboratory tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(12): 1154-1168.
[16]	HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293.
[17]	LYSMER J, KUHLEMEYER R L. Finite dynamic model for infinite media[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1969, 95(4): 859-877.
[18]	KOIZUMO A. Seismic Damages and Case Study for Shield Tunnel[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2009.
[19]	王继栋. 基于pushover法地铁盾构隧道抗震弹塑性分析及性能指标研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016. WANG Jidong. Elasto-plastic Analysis and Performance Index Research of Subway Shield Tunnel Based on Pushover Method[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese)