Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 47 Issue 2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
Supplements
ZHANG Zihong, YAN Guanyu, XU Chengshun, DU Hegang. Seismic responses of underground structures based on centrifuge shaking table test in liquefiable site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 324-336. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231101
Citation: ZHANG Zihong, YAN Guanyu, XU Chengshun, DU Hegang. Seismic responses of underground structures based on centrifuge shaking table test in liquefiable site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 324-336. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231101
shu

Seismic responses of underground structures based on centrifuge shaking table test in liquefiable site

  • 1.

    China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Urban Rail Transit Center of CARS, Beijing 100081, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

More Information
  • Received Date: November 23, 2023
  • Available Online: July 11, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to study the effects of site liquefaction on the seismic responses of underground structures, the centrifuge shaking table tests under liquefiable site conditions are carried out. The seismic response laws of underground structures in liquefiable site are obtained. The attenuation degree of soil stiffness under different liquefaction degrees of the site is obtained by using the Pushover analysis method. The conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) The peak total strain responses of the sidewalls and plates of the model structures are within the elastic range under the four loading conditions. The strains of the center column just exceed the elastic strain limit of concrete under large earthquakes, with a low level of damage. The underground structures conforming to the existing codes exhibit good seismic performance. (2) The inter-story drifts of the structures in the liquefiable site are attenuated by 63%~76% compared with those in the site at the structural equivalent height under the four loading conditions. (3) From the horizontal displacement of the site and the displacement attenuation ratio of the soil-structure system, although the liquefaction of the saturated sandy soil layer will lead to a larger horizontal displacement of the site, the reduction of the soil-structure stiffness ratio caused by the liquefaction of the site will still avoid the structures from experiencing a larger inter-story drift and serious damage. (4) When applying the Pushover analysis method to simplify the analysis of underground structures in liquefiable sites, the most unfavorable conditions should be considered, and the soil modulus can be discounted to 3% of the initial modulus for calculation.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    IIDA H, HIROTO T, YOSHIDA N, et al. Damage to Daikai subway station[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36: 283-300. doi: 10.3208/sandf.36.Special_283
    [2]
    WANG Z Z, GAO B, JIANG Y J, et al. Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(2): 546-558. doi: 10.1007/s11431-009-0054-z
    [3]
    YAMAGUCHI A, MORI T, KAZAMA M, et al. Liquefaction in Tohoku district during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(5): 811-829. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.005
    [4]
    HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
    [5]
    SUN Q Q, DIAS D, RIBEIRO E SOUSA L. Impact of an underlying soft soil layer on tunnel lining in seismic conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 90: 293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.011
    [6]
    唐军平, 李建强, 孙双祥, 等. 佛山市城市轨道交通二号线南庄站砂土液化分析及处理措施[J]. 路基工程, 2017(1): 189-193, 212.

    TANG Junping, LI Jianqiang, SUN Shuangxiang, et al. Analysis of sand liquefaction at Nanzhuang Station of Foshan urban rail transit line 2 and treatment measure[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2017(1): 189-193, 212. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    MENG F Y, CHEN R P, KANG X. Effects of tunneling-induced soil disturbance on the post-construction settlement in structured soft soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 80: 53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.007
    [8]
    ZHENG G, FAN Q, ZHANG T Q, et al. Multistage regulation strategy as a tool to control the vertical displacement of railway tracks placed over the building site of two overlapped shield tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.040
    [9]
    AN J H, TAO L J, JIANG L Z, et al. A shaking table-based experimental study of seismic response of shield-enlarge-dig type's underground subway station in liquefiable ground[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 147: 106621. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106621
    [10]
    凌道盛, 郭恒, 蔡武军, 等. 地铁车站地震破坏离心机振动台模型试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2012, 46(12): 2201-2209. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.12.010

    LING Daosheng, GUO Heng, CAI Wujun, et al. Research on seismic damage of metro station with centrifuge shaking table model test[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2012, 46(12): 2201-2209. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2012.12.010
    [11]
    CHEN G X, CHEN S, QI C Z, et al. Shaking table tests on a three-arch type subway station structure in a liquefiable soil[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(6): 1675-1701. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9675-0
    [12]
    CHEN S, TANG B Z, ZHUANG H Y, et al. Experimental investigation of the seismic response of shallow-buried subway station in liquefied soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 136: 106153. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106153
    [13]
    TANG B Z, YU B Y, ZHUANG H Y, et al. Seismic behavior of irregular underground structures in saturated sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 179: 108478. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108478
    [14]
    王刚, 张建民, 魏星. 可液化土层中地下车站的地震反应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(10): 1623-1627. http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/14212

    WANG Gang, ZHANG Jianmin, WEI Xing. Seismic response analysis of a subway station in liquefiable soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1623-1627. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/14212
    [15]
    WU Q, DING X M, ZHANG Y L, et al. Experimental and numerical study on dynamic response of underground structure in coral sand under earthquakes[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 28(1): 62-84. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2023.2173491
    [16]
    CHEN S, TANG B Z, ZHAO K, et al. Seismic response of irregular underground structures under adverse soil conditions using shaking table tests[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103145. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103145
    [17]
    邹炎, 景立平, 李永强. 隧道穿过土层分界面振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(增刊1): 3340-3348.

    ZOU Yan, JING Liping, LI Yongqiang. Study of shaking table model test of tunnel through soil interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(S1): 3340-3348. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    刘春晓, 陶连金, 边金, 等. 可液化土层对地下结构地震影响的振动台试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(7): 1327-1338.

    LIU Chunxiao, TAO Lianjin, BIAN Jin, et al. Shaking table test of seismic effect of liquefiable soil layer on underground structure[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(7): 1327-1338. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    CHEN R R, TAIEBAT M, WANG R, et al. Effects of layered liquefiable deposits on the seismic response of an underground structure[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 113: 124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.037
    [20]
    ZHU T, WANG R, ZHANG J M. Evaluation of various seismic response analysis methods for underground structures in saturated sand[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 110: 103803. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103803
    [21]
    城市轨道交通结构抗震设计规范: GB 50909—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.

    Code for Seismic Design of Urban Rail Transit Structures: GB 50909—2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    张梓鸿, 许成顺, 闫冠宇, 等. 液化夹层场地地铁车站结构离心机振动台试验方案设计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(5): 879-888. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202205011

    ZHANG Zihong, XU Chengshun, YAN Guanyu, et al. Experimental design for dynamic centrifuge tests on a subway station structure in liquefied interlayer site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 879-888. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202205011
    [23]
    KUTTER B L. Dynamic centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1992: 24-30.
    [24]
    BANERJEES. Centrifuge and Numerical Modelling of Soft Clay-pile-raft Foundations Subjected to Seismic Shaking[D]. Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2009.
    [25]
    MONTOYA-NOGUERA S, LOPEZ-CABALLERO F. Effect of coupling excess pore pressure and deformation on nonlinear seismic soil response[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2016, 11(1): 191-207. doi: 10.1007/s11440-014-0355-7
    [26]
    DU X L, JIANG J W, EL NAGGAR M H, et al. Interstory drift ratio associated with performance objectives for shallow-buried multistory and span subway stations in inhomogeneous soil profiles[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2021, 50(2): 655-672.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YANG Xiao-hui, LU Fa, GUO Nan, ZHU Yan-peng, ZHOU Shuai-kang. Stability calculation and numerical simulation of multi-stage high loess slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 172-177. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1031
    [2]ZENG Hong-yan, HAN Li-biao, ZHOU Cheng, LIU Wei, TAN Chang-ming. Model tests and numerical analysis of slopes reinforced by short anti-sliding piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(S1): 132-136. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2020S1026
    [3]LI Wei, ZHENG Hong. New boundary treatment for seepage flow problem based on numerical manifold method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1867-1873. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201710015
    [4]ZHANG Yu-cheng, YANG Guang-hua, HU Hai-ying, LIU Peng, ZHONG Zhi-hui. Searching for critical slip surface in soil slopes based on calculated results by variable modulus elastoplastic strength reduction method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk1): 14-22.
    [5]QI Xiao-hui, LI Dian-qing, ZHOU Chuang-bing, PHOON Kok-kwang. Stochastic analysis method of critical slip surfaces in soil slopes considering spatial variability[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(4): 745-753.
    [6]Simulation of critical slip field method of slopes based on optimization algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(6).
    [7]QU Chengzhong, XIE Lili. Numerical solution of displacement on performance point[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(10): 1159-1161.
    [8]ZOU Guangdian, CHEN Shengshui. A design method of stabilizing piles and its optimized numerical model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(1): 11-17.
    [9]DAI Zihang, SHEN Pusheng. Study on numerical solution of general limit equilibrium method for stability analysis of soil slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 327-331.
    [10]Zhu Dayong. Critical Slip Field of Slope and Its Numerical Simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(1): 65-71.
    • Supplements (1)

  • Other Related Supplements

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return