• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
FU Haiqing, YI Jixiang, FENG Luwei, YANG Jiyuan. In-situ liquefaction tests considering effects of overburden pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 558-566. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230096
Citation: FU Haiqing, YI Jixiang, FENG Luwei, YANG Jiyuan. In-situ liquefaction tests considering effects of overburden pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 558-566. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230096

In-situ liquefaction tests considering effects of overburden pressure

More Information
  • Received Date: February 06, 2023
  • Available Online: June 05, 2023
  • The in-situ liquefaction test is a new and exploratory research approach for soil liquefaction in geotechnical engineering in recent years. At present, in the in-situ liquefaction tests by the previous researchers, the overburden pressure of the liquefiable soil is commonly below 20 kPa, which certainly differs from the real conditions in the field. This limitation extremely makes the investigations on soil liquefaction unreliable through these in-situ tests. Based on the basic idea of multiple cases, feasibility, repeatability and low cost, a new in-situ liquefaction test method is proposed to account for the effects of overburden pressure on soil liquefaction. Taking the dry sands as a reference, two cases of liquefaction tests under the overburden pressures of 25 and 50 kPa, respectively, are carried out. Based on the current understandings of soil liquefaction, the dynamic responses and characteristics obtained in the tests are analyzed and used to verify that the proposed test method is credible and reliable. The main points are as follows: (1) A new concept of testing pore pressure ratio is proposed to preliminarily evaluate the results of an in-situ liquefaction test considering the effects of overburden pressure. (2) Under the low-stress level of overburden pressure (0~50 kPa), approximately buried at a depth of 0~5 m in the field, it should be emphasized that the overburden pressure is a sensitive factor to affect the dynamic responses of soil liquefaction. (3) When the induced volumetric strain of saturated sand is in a range of 0.1%~1%, the residual pore pressure increases rapidly. When the residual pore pressure ratio reaches 0.6, the ground surface settlement response of a dry sand site differs from that of a saturated soil site under the identical experimental conditions. The results can provide a new alternative to soil liquefaction research in which the experimental conditions are closer to the real field, in the 1g gravity environments.
  • [1]
    DOBRY R, ABDOUN T. Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143(10): 04017077. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001778
    [2]
    付海清, 袁晓铭. 现场液化监测与现场液化试验研究综述[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2021, 41(2): 104-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202102011.htm

    FU Haiqing, YUAN Xiaoming. A review of recent advances on in situ liquefaction monitoring and the in situ liquefaction test[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2021, 41(2): 104-114. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202102011.htm
    [3]
    WANG L M, HE K M, SHI Y C, et al. Study on liquefaction of saturated loess by in-situ explosion test[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2002, 1(1): 50-56. doi: 10.1007/s11803-002-0007-z
    [4]
    常方强, 贾永刚, 郭秀军, 等. 黄河口粉土液化过程的现场振动试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(4): 609-616. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/13227

    CHANG Fangqiang, JIA Yonggang, GUO Xiujun, et al. In-situ vibration tests on liquefaction of silt in estuary of the Yellow River[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 609-616. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/13227
    [5]
    刘汉龙, 王维国, 刘军, 等. 饱和砂土场地大型爆炸液化现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(4): 601-608. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201704003

    LIU Hanlong, WANG Weiguo, LIU Jun, et al. Large-scale field tests on blast-induced liquefaction in saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(4): 601-608. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201704003
    [6]
    FU H Q, YUAN X M. Dynamic properties of saturated sand based on the in-situ liquefaction test[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 25(3): 512-534. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1523072
    [7]
    付海清, 袁晓铭, 王淼. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201805008.htm

    FU Haiqing, YUAN Xiaoming, WANG Miao. An incremental model of pore pressure for saturated sand based on in situ liquefaction test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201805008.htm
    [8]
    王维铭. 场地液化特征研究及液化影响因素评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2013.

    WANG Weiming. Study on Liquefaction Characteristics and Liquefaction Influencing Factors Assessment[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2013. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    杨凯文, 李俊超, 王锋, 等. 饱和砂土坝基液化超重力振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(4): 778-786, F0003, F0002. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202204022

    YANG Kaiwen, LI Junchao, WANG Feng, et al. Centrifugal shaking table tests on saturated sand foundation under dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 778-786. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202204022
    [10]
    ORANG M J, MOTAMED R, PRABHAKARAN A, et al. Large-scale shake table tests on a shallow foundation in liquefiable soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 147(1): 04020152.
    [11]
    IDRISS I M, BOULANGER R. Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes[M]. Oakland CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2008.
    [12]
    石兆吉, 张延军, 郁寿松, 等. 土层液化对地面运动特性的影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1994, 14(4): 14-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC199404002.htm

    SHI Zhaoji, ZHANG Yanjun, YU Shousong, et al. Effect of liquefied soil layers on ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 1994, 14(4): 14-23. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC199404002.htm
    [13]
    DOBRY R, LADD R S, YOKEL F Y, et al. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquake by the cyclic strain method[C]//NBS Building Science Series 138, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1982.
    [14]
    周燕国, 梁甜, 李永刚, 等. 含黏粒砂土场地液化离心机振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(9): 1650-1658. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/15278

    ZHOU Yanguo, LIANG Tian, LI Yonggang, et al. Dynamic centrifuge tests on liquefaction of clayey sand ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1650-1658. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/15278
    [15]
    CETIN K O, YOUD T L, SEED R B, et al. Liquefaction induced ground deformations at Hotel Sapanca during Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey earthquake[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(9): 1083-1092.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Zhongjie, WANG Xiaoxiang, YU Jian, HUANG Maosong, WANG Haoran. Coupling effects of pressed caisson and uplift piles on surface settlement[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 119-123. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20039
    [2]DING Zhi, PENG Shaojie, ZHANG Xiao, XU Jiaoming, WEI Xinjiang. Surface settlements caused by shield construction of gas-bearing soils based on column hole shrinkage theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(6): 1270-1278. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230146
    [3]HUANG Chang-fu, LONG Wen, SONG Qi-long, LI Dong, SU Dong, CHEN Xiang-sheng. Influence of reinforcement range on ground settlement of shallow-buried super-large-diameter shield tunneling in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 76-79. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2018
    [4]WANG Yong-hong, ZHANG Ming-yi, LIU Jun-wei, BAI Xiao-yu, YANG Su-chun, SANG Song-kui, YAN Nan. Field tests on excess pore pressure and soil pressure of pile-soil interface for a single pile during pile-sinking in clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 950-958. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201905019
    [5]LI Yuan-xun, ZHU Yan-peng, YE Shuai-hua, MA Xiao-rui. Skewness distribution patterns of surface settlement considering overload effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S1): 171-176. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1028
    [6]WANG Chang-hong, ZHU He-hua, XU Zi-chuan, LI Jian-gao. Ground surface settlement of shield tunnels considering spatial variability of multiple geotechnical parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(2): 270-277. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201802007
    [7]XU Lu-chang, RUI Rui, ZHANG Long, SUN Yi, XIA Yuan-you. Prediction formula for surface settlement in double-line tunnel based on trapdoor tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(8): 1470-1476. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201708014
    [8]HUANG Min, LIU Xiao-li. Ground settlement induced by excavation of pile-anchor retainingfoundation pits in soil-rock mixed areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(suppl): 571-575.
    [9]NIE Zongquan, ZHANG Shanggen, MENG Shaoping. Surface settlement of deep foundation pits by excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1218-1223.
    [10]ZHANG Dongmei, HUANG Hongwei, YANG Jun. Influence of partial drainage of linings on long-term surface settlement over tunnels in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(12): 1430-1436.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 龙潇,孙锐,郑桐. 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析. 岩土力学. 2024(09): 2741-2753 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (324) PDF downloads (100) Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return