• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHANG Zhiguo, CHEN Jinpeng, ZHU Zhengguo, PAN Y T, SUN Miaomiao. Sand liquefaction and seepage pore pressure around shield tunnels in multilayered seabed under action of waves and currents[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 683-693. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230008
Citation: ZHANG Zhiguo, CHEN Jinpeng, ZHU Zhengguo, PAN Y T, SUN Miaomiao. Sand liquefaction and seepage pore pressure around shield tunnels in multilayered seabed under action of waves and currents[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 683-693. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230008

Sand liquefaction and seepage pore pressure around shield tunnels in multilayered seabed under action of waves and currents

More Information
  • Received Date: January 05, 2023
  • Available Online: April 09, 2024
  • At present, the existing theoretical studies on the seepage field around subsea shield tunnels under wave action generally consider the linings as an impermeable medium, and seldom consider the permeability of the tunnel linings, especially the influences of the coupling action of waves and currents on the tunnel. In addition, the existing theories generally regard the seabed as being homogeneous and isotropic, ignoring the influences of multilayered seabed. Firstly, based on the dynamic boundary conditions of seabed surface under wave-current interaction, the pore water pressure response of pure seabed under wave-current interaction is obtained by the transmission and reflection matrix method. Secondly, the mirror image method is introduced to establish the governing equation for the excess pore water pressure caused by the existence of tunnel, and the analytical solution of the equation is obtained by the Fourier series expansion under the continuous seepage between sand and linings. Then, based on the superposition principle, the seepage pressure of the sand around the tunnel in multilayered seabed under the action of waves and currents is obtained. Finally, the theoretical analytical solution is compared with the numerical results and the existing experimental results, and a good agreement is obtained. In addition, the influencing factors for the permeabilites of seabed and tunnel linings are analyzed. The results show that the following currents will increase the pore pressure in the seabed and the liquefaction degree of the seabed, while the opposing currents will reduce the pore pressure in the seabed and the liquefaction of the seabed. The relative difference of the seabed response to the opposing currents at the same velocity is generally greater than that of the following currents. When the permeability coefficient of the upper seabed is large (ks > 1×10-2 m/s), the overall pore pressure of the seabed is large, and the pore pressure at the first stratification changes significantly. When the permeability coefficient of tunnel linings is small (kl < 1×10-6 m/s), the tunnel has an obvious "block" effects on the propagation of the excess pore pressure in the seabed.
  • [1]
    BIOT M A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1941, 12(2): 155-164. doi: 10.1063/1.1712886
    [2]
    BIOT M A. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-Saturated porous solid: I low-Frequency range[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005, 28(2): 168.
    [3]
    BIOT M A. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1962, 33(4): 1482-1498. doi: 10.1063/1.1728759
    [4]
    ZIENKIEWICZ O C, CHANG C T, BETTESS P. Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behaviour assumptions in soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1980, 30(4): 385-395. doi: 10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.385
    [5]
    TOKUO Y, KONING H L, HANS S, et al. On the response of a poro-elastic bed to water waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 87(1): 193-206. doi: 10.1017/S0022112078003006
    [6]
    ULKER M B C, RAHMAN M S, JENG D S. Wave-induced response of seabed: Various formulations and their applicability[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2009, 31(1): 12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2009.03.003
    [7]
    GATMIRI B. Simplified finite element analysis of wave-induced effective stresses and pore pressures in permeable sea beds[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 15-30. doi: 10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.15
    [8]
    THOMAS S D. A finite element model for the analysis of wave induced stresses, displacements and pore pressures in an unsaturated seabed: II model verification[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1995, 17(1): 107-132. doi: 10.1016/0266-352X(95)91305-N
    [9]
    OZGUR KIRCA V S, SUMER B M, FREDSØE J. Influence of clay content on wave-induced liquefaction[J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2013, 140(6): 4014024.
    [10]
    刘晓磊, 贾永刚, 郑杰文. 波浪导致黄河口海床沉积物超孔压响应现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(11): 3055-3062. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201511003.htm

    LIU Xiaolei, JIA Yonggang, ZHENG Jiewen. In situ experiment of wave-induced excess pore pressure in the seabed sediment in Yellow River Estuary[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11): 3055-3062. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201511003.htm
    [11]
    QI W G, LI C F, JENG D S, et al. Combined wave-current induced excess pore-pressure in a sandy seabed: flume observations and comparisons with theoretical models[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2019, 147(5): 89-98.
    [12]
    ZHOU X L, XU B, WANG J H, et al. An analytical solution for wave-induced seabed response in a multi-layered poro-elastic seabed[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(1): 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.10.003
    [13]
    QI H F, CHEN Z L, LI Y C, et al. Wave and current-induced dynamic response in a multilayered poroelastic seabed[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79(1): 11-26. doi: 10.1007/s10064-019-01553-8
    [14]
    ZHOU X L, JENG D S, YAN Y G, et al. Wave-induced multi-layered seabed response around a buried pipeline[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 72(11): 195-208.
    [15]
    ZHU C W, YING H W, GONG X N, et al. Analytical solution for wave-induced hydraulic response on subsea shield tunnel[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 228(5): 108924.
    [16]
    ZIMMERMAN C, STERN M. Scattering of plane compressional waves by spherical inclusions in a poroelastic medium[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998, 94(1): 527.
    [17]
    HSU H C, CHEN Y Y, HUS J R C, et al. Nonlinear water waves on uniform current in Lagrangian coordinates[J]. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 2009, 16(1): 47-61.
    [18]
    DERESIEWICZ H, SKALAK R. On uniqueness in dynamic poroelasticity[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(4): 783-788. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0530040783
    [19]
    ZEN K, YAMAZAKI H. Mechanism of wave-induced liquefaction and densification in seabed[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1990, 30(4): 90-104. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.30.4_90
    [20]
    CHEN H, ZHANG J S, TONG L L, et al. Experimental study of soil responses around a pipeline in a sandy seabed under wave- current load[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2023, 130(1): 103409.
    [21]
    常方强. 波浪作用下黄河口海底滑坡研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2009.

    CHANG Fangqiang. Study on Mechanism of Wave-Induced Submarine Landslide at the Yellow River Estuary[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2009. (in Chinese)
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Chen, WANG Yi, HAN Xiao-feng, JIN Long. Numerical simulation of frost-heave process in lining canals considering contact behaviors of damage effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 188-193. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2041
    [2]LIU Wen-hua, YANG Qing, TANG Xiao-wei, UZUOKA Ryosuke. Numerical simulation of hydro-mechanical behaviors of unsaturated soils under fully undrained conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 486-494. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201703012
    [3]TU Bing-xiong, JIA Jin-qing, YU Jin, CAI Yan-yan, LIU Shi-yu. Numerical simulation of influence on mechanical behavior of flexible retaining method with prestressed anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 146-153. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2025
    [4]GE Shi-ping, XIE Dong-wu, DING Wen-qi, OUYANG Wen-biao. Simplified numerical simulation method for segment joints of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1600-1605.
    [5]FENG Hu, LIU Guo-bin. Numerical simulation of failure mechanism of deep foundation pits in soft soil considering impact of piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 314-320.
    [6]LUO Pingping, ZHU Yueming, ZHAO Yongmei, HE Shan. Numerical simulation of grouting in rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(8): 918-921.
    [7]WU Wenhua, LI Xikui. Constitutive model and numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior in unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(4): 411-416.
    [8]CHEN Zhonghui, THAM L.G., YEUNG M.R.. Renormalization study and numerical simulation on brittle failure of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(2): 183-187.
    [9]LI Dayong, GONG Xiaonan, ZHANG Tuqiao. Numerical simulation of the buried pipelines protection adjacent to deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(6): 736-740.
    [10]CHEN Zhonghui, L.G.Tham, M.R.Yeung. Numerical simulation of damage and failure of rocks under different confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(5): 576-580.
  • Other Related Supplements

Catalog

    Article views (689) PDF downloads (245) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return