• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LI Hang, LI Zewen, LIAO Shaoming, LI Zhiyi, ZHONG Huawei. Field measurement of time-space distribution behaviors of environmental settlement of an ultra-deep excavation in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1595-1604. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220661
Citation: LI Hang, LI Zewen, LIAO Shaoming, LI Zhiyi, ZHONG Huawei. Field measurement of time-space distribution behaviors of environmental settlement of an ultra-deep excavation in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1595-1604. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220661

Field measurement of time-space distribution behaviors of environmental settlement of an ultra-deep excavation in Shanghai soft ground

More Information
  • Received Date: May 22, 2022
  • Available Online: February 23, 2023
  • Based on the extensive field observations, the environmental deformation characteristics of a 31.3 m-deep excavation in Shanghai soft ground are investigated. The results show that compared with the general excavations with a depth ranging from 12 to 20 m, the ultra-deep excavation presents significant environmental effects and time-space distribution behaviors: (1) The influence zone of settlement near the long side of the excavation is related to the wall deflection distribution on the plane. The more gently the lateral wall displacement changes from the middle area to the corner, the more extensive the influence zone is. The faster the lateral wall displacement transits from the middle to the corner of the excavation, the more concentrated the influential zone is. (2) Due to the corner effects, the ground surface settlement decreases rapidly from the center to the corner, and exhibits a Gaussian distribution law, with the influence range extending to 1.5He (depth of excavation) behind the excavation corner. (3) The deformation of buildings exhibits distinct three-dimensional characteristics. The buildings located near the excavation corner have less settlement than those near the center of the excavation, accompanied by a certain torsional deformation. (4) When the buildings paralleling to the retaining wall cross the corner of the excavation, the most dangerous point is located within 0.5He near the corner of the excavation, and its damage degree depends on the relative location between the buildings and the excavation and their stiffness. (5) Compared with the conventional deep excavations, the ultra-deep excavation leads to a larger primary influence zone for ground surface settlement, reaching about 3He, but the location of the maximum surface settlement is closer to the wall, nearly 0.5He behind the retaining wall. (6) The maximum ground surface settlement δvm is about 0.03%~0.50%He, and the relationship between the maximum ground surface settlement δvm and the maximum lateral wall displacement δhm can be expressed by δvm=0.6δhm averagely.
  • [1]
    BOSCARDIN M D, CORDING E J. Building response to excavation-induced settlement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(1): 1-21. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:1(1)
    [2]
    LI H, TANG Y J, LIAO S M, et al. Structural response and preservation of historic buildings adjacent to oversized deep excavation[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2021, 35(6): 04021095. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001676
    [3]
    PECK. Deep excavation and tunnelling in soft ground[C]// ICSMFE Proc 7th Int Conf SMFE State of the Art Volume. Mexico: Balkema, 1969: 225-290.
    [4]
    MANA A I, CLOUGH G W. Prediction of movements for braced cuts in clay[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1981, 107(6): 759-777. doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0001150
    [5]
    CLOUGH R W, O'ROURKE T D. Construction induced movements of in-situ walls[J]. Specialty Conference on Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures, 1990: 430-477.
    [6]
    OU C Y, HSIEH P G, CHIOU D C. Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1993, 30(5): 758-767. doi: 10.1139/t93-068
    [7]
    KUNG G T, JUANG C H, HSIAO E C, et al. Simplified model for wall deflection and ground-surface settlement caused by braced excavation in clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(6): 731-747. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(731)
    [8]
    王卫东, 徐中华, 王建华. 上海地区深基坑周边地表变形性状实测统计分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666. http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/14412

    WANG Weidong, XU Zhonghua, WANG Jianhua. Statistical analysis of characteristics of ground surface settlement caused by deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666. (in Chinese) http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/14412
    [9]
    TAN Y, WANG D L. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay Ⅰ: bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1875-1893. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000928
    [10]
    OU C Y, CHIOU D C, WU T S. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of deep excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(5): 337-345. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(337)
    [11]
    LEE F H, YONG K Y, QUAN K C N, et al. Effect of corners in strutted excavations: field monitoring and case histories[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(4): 339-349. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(339)
    [12]
    FINNO R J, BLACKBURN J T, ROBOSKI J F. Three-dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(1): 30-36. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:1(30)
    [13]
    WANG Z W, NG C W, LIU G B. Characteristics of wall deflections and ground surface settlements in Shanghai[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(5): 1243-1254. doi: 10.1139/t05-056
    [14]
    LIU G B, JIANG R J, NG C W W, et al. Deformation characteristics of a 38 m deep excavation in soft clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(12): 1817-1828. doi: 10.1139/t11-075
    [15]
    TAN Y, WEI B, DIAO Y P, et al. Spatial corner effects of long and narrow multipropped deep excavations in Shanghai soft clay[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(4): 04014015. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000475
    [16]
    DG/TJ08—61—2018基坑工程技术标准[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2018.

    DG/TJ08—61—2018 Technical Code for Excavation Engineering[S]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press: 2018. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    徐中华. 上海地区支护结构与主体地下结构相结合的深基坑变形性状研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007.

    XU Zhonghua. Deformation Behavior of Deep Excavations Supported by Permanent Structure in Shanghai Soft Deposit[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2007. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    TAN Y, WEI B. Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation constructed by cut-and-cover technique in Shanghai soft clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(1): 69-88. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000553
    [19]
    HSIEH P G, OU C Y. Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(6): 1004-1017. doi: 10.1139/t98-056
    [20]
    上海市地基基础设计标准: DGJ08—11—2018[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2019.

    Foundation Design Code: DGJ08—11—2018[S]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press: 2019. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    LIU G B, NG C W, WANG Z W. Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(8): 1004-1013. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(1004)
    [22]
    TAN Y, WANG D L. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay Ⅱ: top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1894-1910. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000929
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 王蓉,翟新乐,吕玺琳. 低渗透性污染场地高压旋喷修复药剂迁移特性数值模拟分析. 地基处理. 2024(06): 580-588 .
    2. 吴霞,桑康云,刘泽宇. 有机污染场地原位化学氧化高压旋喷修复试验. 环境工程. 2023(07): 124-130 .
    3. 柳迪,宋权威,李玲,胡杰,王颋军,杜显元,邓永锋,柯瀚. ERT法监测高压旋喷修复PAHs污染现场试验研究. 中国环境科学. 2023(11): 5933-5943 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (458) PDF downloads (193) Cited by(4)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return