Method for calculating pumping and recharging confined water inside and outside excavations under suspended waterproof curtain

WU Yongxia; SHEN Shuilong

doi:10.11779/CJGE20220564

Volume 45 Issue 9

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2023 > 45(9): 1971-1978. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220564

WU Yongxia, SHEN Shuilong. Method for calculating pumping and recharging confined water inside and outside excavations under suspended waterproof curtain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(9): 1971-1978. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220564

Citation:

PDF (1739 KB)

Method for calculating pumping and recharging confined water inside and outside excavations under suspended waterproof curtain

WU Yongxia^1,,
SHEN Shuilong²

1.
College of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
2.
College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China

More Information

Received Date: May 05, 2022
Available Online: September 06, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The surrounding environment will be affected when the confined water in an excavation is pumped under a suspended waterproof curtain. The groundwater recharge can effectively control the groundwater drawdown outside the excavation so as to protect the environment. The existence of the waterproof curtain makes the head difference at two sides of the curtain during pumping and recharging of the confined water. The head difference is caused by the variation of seepage direction and path and the reduction of the seepage area. A series of equations to calculate the head difference during recharging outside the excavation are obtained by the numerical simulation regression method. The groundwater head difference during pumping-recharging action is the sum of the head difference during pumping and recharging, respectively. The proposed equations indicate that the head difference is related to the width of the waterproof curtain, the inserted depth of the waterproof curtain into the confined aquifer, the anisotropy of the aquifer, the thickness of the aquifer, and the hydraulic gradient under normal conditions. Finally, the proposed method is applied to a field case to verify its validity.
- waterproof curtain,
- confined aquifer,
- excavation,
- pumping-recharge action,
- head difference

FullText(HTML)

References (13)

References

[1]	郑刚, 曹剑然, 程雪松, 等. 天津第二粉土粉砂微承压含水层回灌试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(4): 592-601. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201804002 ZHENG Gang, CAO Jianran, CHENG Xuesong, et al. Experimental study on artificial recharge of second Tianjin silt and silty sand micro-confined aquifer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(4): 592-601. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201804002
[2]	郑刚, 曹剑然, 程雪松, 等. 考虑承压含水层间越流的地下水回灌现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(9): 1609-1618. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201909004 ZHENG Gang, CAO Jianran, CHENG Xuesong, et al. Field tests on groundwater recharge considering leakage between semiconfined aquifers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1609-1618. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201909004
[3]	刘祥勇, 宋享桦, 谭勇, 等. 南通富水砂性地层地铁深基坑抽水回灌现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(7): 1331-1340. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202007017 LIU Xiangyong, SONG Xianghua, TAN Yong, et al. Field tests on groundwater recharge of deep excavations in Nantong water-rich sandy stratum[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(7): 1331-1340. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202007017
[4]	陆建生, 潘伟强, 沈池, 等. 深基坑承压水抽灌一体化设计及工程应用[J]. 施工技术, 2014, 43(1): 48-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGJS201401016.htm LU Jiansheng, PAN Weiqiang, SHEN Chi, et al. Design and application on pumping-recharge integration system of deep foundation excavation[J]. Construction Technology, 2014, 43(1): 48-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGJS201401016.htm
[5]	ZHENG G, HA D, ZENG C, et al. Influence of the opening timing of recharge wells on settlement caused by dewatering in excavations[J]. Journal of Hydrology. 2019, 573: 534-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.079
[6]	李又云, 王欢, 苏世强, 等. 软土深基坑单井回灌参数优化与现场测试分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(2): 520-528. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE202102026.htm LI Youyun, WANG Huan, SU Shiqiang, et al. Parameters optimization and field test analysis on recharge well in deep foundation pit of soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(2): 520-528. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE202102026.htm
[7]	PUJADES E, LÓPEZ A, CARRERA J, et al. Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers[J]. Engineering Geology, 2012, 145/146: 41-49.
[8]	SHEN S L, WU Y X, MISRA A. Calculation of head difference at two sides of a cut-off barrier during excavation dewatering[J]. Computer and Geotechnics, 2017, 91: 192-202.
[9]	WU Y X, SHEN S L, YUAN D J. Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under blocking effect of retaining wall in aquifer[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, (539): 554-566.
[10]	THIEM G. Hydrologische Methoden[M]. Gebhardt: Leipzig, 1906.
[11]	KOZENY J. Theorie und berechnung der brunnen[J]. Wasserkraft und Wassenwirtschaft, 1933, 28: 88-92, 101-105, 113-116.
[12]	上海长凯岩土有限公司. 500 kV上海世博变电站工程群井抽水试验报告[R]. 上海: 上海长凯岩土有限公司, 2007. Shanghai Changkai Geotechnical Co, LTD. Report of group wells pumping test of 500KV Shanghai Expo Substation Project[R]. Shanghai: Shanghai Changkai Geotechnical Co, LTD, 2007. (in Chinese)
[13]	WU Y X, SHEN J S, CHENG WC, et al. Semi-analytical solution to pumping test data with barrier, wellbore storage, and partial penetration effects[J]. Engneering Geology, 2017, 226: 44-51.

[1]	ZHANG Chen, WANG Yi, HAN Xiao-feng, JIN Long. Numerical simulation of frost-heave process in lining canals considering contact behaviors of damage effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 188-193. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2041
[2]	LIU Wen-hua, YANG Qing, TANG Xiao-wei, UZUOKA Ryosuke. Numerical simulation of hydro-mechanical behaviors of unsaturated soils under fully undrained conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(3): 486-494. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201703012
[3]	TU Bing-xiong, JIA Jin-qing, YU Jin, CAI Yan-yan, LIU Shi-yu. Numerical simulation of influence on mechanical behavior of flexible retaining method with prestressed anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 146-153. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2025
[4]	GE Shi-ping, XIE Dong-wu, DING Wen-qi, OUYANG Wen-biao. Simplified numerical simulation method for segment joints of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1600-1605.
[5]	FENG Hu, LIU Guo-bin. Numerical simulation of failure mechanism of deep foundation pits in soft soil considering impact of piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 314-320.
[6]	LUO Pingping, ZHU Yueming, ZHAO Yongmei, HE Shan. Numerical simulation of grouting in rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(8): 918-921.
[7]	WU Wenhua, LI Xikui. Constitutive model and numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior in unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(4): 411-416.
[8]	CHEN Zhonghui, THAM L.G., YEUNG M.R.. Renormalization study and numerical simulation on brittle failure of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(2): 183-187.
[9]	LI Dayong, GONG Xiaonan, ZHANG Tuqiao. Numerical simulation of the buried pipelines protection adjacent to deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(6): 736-740.
[10]	CHEN Zhonghui, L.G.Tham, M.R.Yeung. Numerical simulation of damage and failure of rocks under different confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(5): 576-580.