Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests

LIU Wei-zheng; GE Meng-yuan; LI Tian-xiong

doi:10.11779/CJGE2021S2063

Volume 43 Issue S2

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2021 > 43(S2): 267-275. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2063

LIU Wei-zheng, GE Meng-yuan, LI Tian-xiong. Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 267-275. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2063

Citation:

PDF (2965 KB)

Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
2.
National Engineering Laboratory of High Speed Railway Construction Technology, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

More Information

Received Date: August 15, 2021
Available Online: December 05, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Based on a project in Nansha District of Guangzhou City, the physical and mechanical parameters of soft soil obtained from a series of laboratory tests and in-situ tests are compared and statistically calculated, and the variation laws of basic physical properties, strength parameters, deformation parameters and state parameters with depth of soft soil are analyzed. The results show that the soft soil in Nansha District is mainly silt and muddy soil with high water content and liquid limit. The overall strength of soft soil is insufficient, and the compressibility is high. The strength parameters such as penetration resistance, undrained shear strength and bearing capacity of foundation and the deformation parameters such as compression modulus, deformation modulus, undrained Young's modulus and horizontal subgrade coefficient have strong correlation with soil properties. In the silt layer, the parameters increase slowly, and the frequency distribution is concentrated, while in the muddy soil, the parameters increase rapidly, and the frequency distribution is uniform. The static earth pressure coefficient K₀ of soft soil is weakly affected by the soil layer, and the calculated value of China's railway code is more in line with the engineering practice than that of the Marchetti method. The soil is in medium-sensitivity state, and the bottom silt is in underconsolidation state, and the remaining soft soil is in overconsolidation state. The above results may enrich the researches on the in-situ engineering characteristics of soft soil in Nansha District, and provide the corresponding reference for the construction of soft soil projects in this area.
- Nansha soft soil,
- in-situ test,
- mechanical property,
- variation law,
- comparison and statistics

FullText(HTML)

References (15)

References

[1]	杨利柯, 汪益敏. 广州南沙区软土分布特征及处理对策研究[J]. 路基工程, 2016(2): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJGC201602003.htm YANG Li-ke, WANG Yi-min. Research on distributional characteristics and treatment measures of soft soil in Nansha district, Guangzhou[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2016(2): 9-13. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJGC201602003.htm
[2]	林军. 基于CPTU的软土空间变异性及基坑稳健性设计方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2018. LIN Jun. Research on the Spatial Variability and Robust Geotechnical Design of Excavation in Soft Soils Based on CPTU Data[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[3]	VIANA D A, FONSECA A, SILVA S R, et al. Geotechnical characterization by in situ and lab tests to the back-analysis of a supported excavation in metro do Porto[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(3): 251-264. doi: 10.1007/s10706-008-9183-6
[4]	温勇, 杨光华, 汤连生, 等. 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(增刊2): 209-215. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.025 WEN Yong, YANG Guang-hua, TANG Lian-sheng, et al. Tests and parameters study of mechanical properties of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(S2): 209-215. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.025
[5]	FIRUZI M, ASGHARI-KALJAHI E, AKGÜN H. Correlations of SPT, CPT and pressuremeter test data in alluvial soils. Case study: Tabriz Metro Line 2, Iran[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(7): 5067-5086. doi: 10.1007/s10064-018-01456-0
[6]	RABARIJOELY S. A new method for the estimation of hydraulic permeability, coefficient of consolidation, and soil fraction based on the dilatometer tests (DMT)[J]. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 2019, 41(4): 212-222. doi: 10.2478/sgem-2019-0021
[7]	王进, 朱泽奇, 陈健, 等. 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊1): 195-202. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.023 WANG Jin, ZHU Ze-qi, CHEN Jian, et al. Study of in situ mechanical properties of littoral deposit soft soil by self-boring pressuremeter[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(S1): 195-202. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.023
[8]	宋许根, 王志勇, 柏威伟, 等. 珠海软土工程特性空间异性规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(增刊1): 25-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1008.htm SONG Xu-gen, WANG Zhi-yong, BAI Wei-wei, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of engineering properties of Zhuhai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 25-28. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1008.htm
[9]	宋许根, 王志勇, 柏威伟, 等. 珠海西部中心城区大面积深厚软土工程特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(7): 1434-1451. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1331 SONG Xu-gen, WANG Zhi-yong, BAI Wei-wei, et al. Study on engineering characteristics of large-scale deep soft soil in the central area of westernZhuhai[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(7): 1434-1451. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1331
[10]	程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 等. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886, 1898. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82305-1019849941.htm CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, et al. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886, 1898. (in Chinese) https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82305-1019849941.htm
[11]	BOMBASARO E, KASPER T. Evaluation of spatial soil variability in the Pearl River Estuary using CPTU data[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(3): 496-505. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.015
[12]	陈运坤, 高磊, 屈尚侠. 广州南沙区软土工程特性及软土分区评价[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2020, 28(36): 102-103. CHEN Yun-kun, GAO Lei, Qu Shang-xia, Engineering characteristics and assessment of soft soil in Guangzhou[J]. Technology and Economic Guide, 2020, 28(36): 102-103. (in Chinese)
[13]	MARCHETTI S. Closure to “in situ test by flat dilatometer”[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1981, 107(6): 832-837. doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0001155
[14]	铁路工程地质原位测试规程 TB 10018—2018[S]. 北京: 2018. Code for in-site testing of railway engineering geology. TB 10018—2018[S]. 2018. (in Chinese)
[15]	MARCHETTI S. A new in-situ test for the measurement of horizontal soil deformability[J]. Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, ASCE, 1975, 2: 225-259.