• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LIU Wei-zheng, GE Meng-yuan, LI Tian-xiong. Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 267-275. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2063
Citation: LIU Wei-zheng, GE Meng-yuan, LI Tian-xiong. Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 267-275. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2063

Comparison and statistical analysis of engineering characteristics of marine soft soil in Nansha District of Guangzhou City based on in-situ tests

More Information
  • Received Date: August 15, 2021
  • Available Online: December 05, 2022
  • Based on a project in Nansha District of Guangzhou City, the physical and mechanical parameters of soft soil obtained from a series of laboratory tests and in-situ tests are compared and statistically calculated, and the variation laws of basic physical properties, strength parameters, deformation parameters and state parameters with depth of soft soil are analyzed. The results show that the soft soil in Nansha District is mainly silt and muddy soil with high water content and liquid limit. The overall strength of soft soil is insufficient, and the compressibility is high. The strength parameters such as penetration resistance, undrained shear strength and bearing capacity of foundation and the deformation parameters such as compression modulus, deformation modulus, undrained Young's modulus and horizontal subgrade coefficient have strong correlation with soil properties. In the silt layer, the parameters increase slowly, and the frequency distribution is concentrated, while in the muddy soil, the parameters increase rapidly, and the frequency distribution is uniform. The static earth pressure coefficient K0 of soft soil is weakly affected by the soil layer, and the calculated value of China's railway code is more in line with the engineering practice than that of the Marchetti method. The soil is in medium-sensitivity state, and the bottom silt is in underconsolidation state, and the remaining soft soil is in overconsolidation state. The above results may enrich the researches on the in-situ engineering characteristics of soft soil in Nansha District, and provide the corresponding reference for the construction of soft soil projects in this area.
  • [1]
    杨利柯, 汪益敏. 广州南沙区软土分布特征及处理对策研究[J]. 路基工程, 2016(2): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJGC201602003.htm

    YANG Li-ke, WANG Yi-min. Research on distributional characteristics and treatment measures of soft soil in Nansha district, Guangzhou[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2016(2): 9-13. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LJGC201602003.htm
    [2]
    林军. 基于CPTU的软土空间变异性及基坑稳健性设计方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2018.

    LIN Jun. Research on the Spatial Variability and Robust Geotechnical Design of Excavation in Soft Soils Based on CPTU Data[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    VIANA D A, FONSECA A, SILVA S R, et al. Geotechnical characterization by in situ and lab tests to the back-analysis of a supported excavation in metro do Porto[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(3): 251-264. doi: 10.1007/s10706-008-9183-6
    [4]
    温勇, 杨光华, 汤连生, 等. 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(增刊2): 209-215. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.025

    WEN Yong, YANG Guang-hua, TANG Lian-sheng, et al. Tests and parameters study of mechanical properties of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(S2): 209-215. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.025
    [5]
    FIRUZI M, ASGHARI-KALJAHI E, AKGÜN H. Correlations of SPT, CPT and pressuremeter test data in alluvial soils. Case study: Tabriz Metro Line 2, Iran[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(7): 5067-5086. doi: 10.1007/s10064-018-01456-0
    [6]
    RABARIJOELY S. A new method for the estimation of hydraulic permeability, coefficient of consolidation, and soil fraction based on the dilatometer tests (DMT)[J]. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 2019, 41(4): 212-222. doi: 10.2478/sgem-2019-0021
    [7]
    王进, 朱泽奇, 陈健, 等. 海相沉积软土的自钻式旁压试验及原位力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊1): 195-202. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.023

    WANG Jin, ZHU Ze-qi, CHEN Jian, et al. Study of in situ mechanical properties of littoral deposit soft soil by self-boring pressuremeter[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(S1): 195-202. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.023
    [8]
    宋许根, 王志勇, 柏威伟, 等. 珠海软土工程特性空间异性规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(增刊1): 25-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1008.htm

    SONG Xu-gen, WANG Zhi-yong, BAI Wei-wei, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of engineering properties of Zhuhai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 25-28. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1008.htm
    [9]
    宋许根, 王志勇, 柏威伟, 等. 珠海西部中心城区大面积深厚软土工程特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(7): 1434-1451. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1331

    SONG Xu-gen, WANG Zhi-yong, BAI Wei-wei, et al. Study on engineering characteristics of large-scale deep soft soil in the central area of westernZhuhai[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(7): 1434-1451. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1331
    [10]
    程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 等. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886, 1898. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82305-1019849941.htm

    CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, et al. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886, 1898. (in Chinese) https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82305-1019849941.htm
    [11]
    BOMBASARO E, KASPER T. Evaluation of spatial soil variability in the Pearl River Estuary using CPTU data[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(3): 496-505. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.015
    [12]
    陈运坤, 高磊, 屈尚侠. 广州南沙区软土工程特性及软土分区评价[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2020, 28(36): 102-103.

    CHEN Yun-kun, GAO Lei, Qu Shang-xia, Engineering characteristics and assessment of soft soil in Guangzhou[J]. Technology and Economic Guide, 2020, 28(36): 102-103. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    MARCHETTI S. Closure to “in situ test by flat dilatometer”[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1981, 107(6): 832-837. doi: 10.1061/AJGEB6.0001155
    [14]
    铁路工程地质原位测试规程 TB 10018—2018[S]. 北京: 2018.

    Code for in-site testing of railway engineering geology. TB 10018—2018[S]. 2018. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    MARCHETTI S. A new in-situ test for the measurement of horizontal soil deformability[J]. Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, ASCE, 1975, 2: 225-259.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 王彦臻,范宏飞,赵凯,陈国兴,江志杰. 深厚复杂海峡场地二维非线性地震反应特性. 岩土工程学报. 2024(02): 345-356 . 本站查看
    2. 崔浇,王爱国,张波,陆诗铭,冯紫微. 基于地质属性和地形特征的场地参数v_(S30)估算方法. 地震工程学报. 2024(06): 1437-1445 .
    3. Zeqiang Chen,Huajian Yao,Xihui Shao,Song Luo,Hongfeng Yang. Detailed sedimentary structure of the Mianning segment of the Anninghe fault zone revealed by H/V spectral ratio. Earthquake Research Advances. 2023(03): 19-29 .
    4. 徐雨,吴琪,方怡,陈国兴. 伶仃洋海域土剪切波速预测方法研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(05): 956-964 .
    5. 刘薛宁,陈国兴,任炜,金丹丹,许汉刚. 深厚第四纪沉积土非线性性能对地表地震动特性的影响. 地震工程学报. 2021(01): 79-89 .
    6. 王建宁,马国伟,庄海洋,窦远明,付继赛. 不同类别场地大型异跨地铁地下车站结构地震反应分析. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2021(02): 324-336 .
    7. 宋健,师黎静,党鹏飞,李昕蕾. 哈尔滨市剪切波速与埋深相关性分析. 建筑结构. 2020(S1): 1088-1092 .
    8. 刘薛宁,陈国兴,任炜,金丹丹,许汉刚. 深厚第四纪沉积土非线性性能对地表地震动特性的影响. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2020(04): 498-508 .
    9. 陈国兴,李磊,丁杰发,赵凯. 巨厚沉积土夹火山岩场地非线性地震反应特性. 岩土力学. 2020(09): 3056-3065+3076 .
    10. 陈国兴,刘薛宁,朱姣,金丹丹,许汉刚. 深厚松软场地卓越周期与地面峰值加速度的空间变异特征:以苏州为例. 岩土工程学报. 2019(06): 996-1004 . 本站查看
    11. 杨明杰,郭明珠. 覆盖土层厚度对地表峰值加速度的影响研究. 防灾科技学院学报. 2019(04): 30-34 .
    12. 王琦,刘红帅,郑桐,薄景山,李平,韩蓬勃. 天津地区覆盖土层剪切波速与埋深的相关性分析. 地震工程与工程振动. 2018(06): 190-201 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (227) PDF downloads (112) Cited by(17)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return