Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue S2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LIN Jun, LIU Song-yu, CHENG Yue-hong, CAI Guo-jun, FAN Qin-jian, LI Cui. Classification of soft clay in Jiangsu Province based on piezocone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 241-244. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2057
Citation: LIN Jun, LIU Song-yu, CHENG Yue-hong, CAI Guo-jun, FAN Qin-jian, LI Cui. Classification of soft clay in Jiangsu Province based on piezocone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 241-244. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2057
shu

Classification of soft clay in Jiangsu Province based on piezocone penetration tests

  • 1.

    Zhongyifeng Construction Group Co., LTD, Suzhou 215131, China

  • 2.

    Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 14, 2021
  • Available Online: December 05, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The classification results of soft soils in Jiangsu Province are derived through the CPTU data. The soil classification methods based on the CPTU data are reiviewed, then the SBT (soil behavior type) method and the Ic (soil index) method are chosen to identify the soft soils in Jiangsu province, including Northern Jiangsu marine clay, Lixiahe lagoon clay, Yangtze Delta alluvial clay and Taihu alluvial clay. The soil classification results show that the CPTU data can be used to effectively recognize the typical soft soils in Jiangsu province, and the SBT results are consistent with Ic results. Morever, the boundary between different soil types is more obvious in Ic soil classification chart.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    邓永锋, 吴燕开, 刘松玉, 等. 连云港浅层海相软土沉积环境及物理力学性质研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2005, 13(1): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200501003.htm

    DENG Yong-feng, WU Yan-kai, LIU Song-yu, et al. Sediment environment of shallow marine clays deposited in Lianyungang area and their physical and mechanical properties[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2005, 13(1): 29-33. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200501003.htm
    [2]
    刘松玉, 蔡国军, 邹海峰. 基于CPTU的中国实用土分类方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1765-1776. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201310002.htm

    LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, ZOU Hai-feng. Practical soil classification methods in China based on piezocone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 1765-1776. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201310002.htm
    [3]
    岩土工程勘察规范：GB50021—2001[S]. 2009.

    Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering: GB 50021—2001[S]. 2009. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    ASTM. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purpose (USCS)[S]. ASTM Standard D2487. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
    [5]
    JONES G A, RUST E. Piezometer penetration testing CPTU[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-II. Amsterdam, 1982.
    [6]
    SENNESET K, JANBU N. Shear strength parameters obtained from static cone penetration tests[C]//Proceedings of Strength Testing of Marine sediments; Laboratory and In situ Measurement. San Diego, 1985
    [7]
    ROBERTSON P K, CAMPANELLA R G, GILLESPIE D, et al. Use of piezometer cone data[C]//Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ'86Blacksburg, 1986.
    [8]
    WROTH C P. The interpretation of in situ soil tests[J]. Géotechnique, 1984, 34(4): 449-489. doi: 10.1680/geot.1984.34.4.449
    [9]
    WROTH C P. Penetration testing: a more rigorous approach to interpretation[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1. Orlando, 1988.
    [10]
    ROBERTSON P K. Soil classification using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27(1): 151-158. doi: 10.1139/t90-014
    [11]
    LUNNE T, POWELL J J M, ROBERTSON P K. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London: Blackie Academic and Professional, 1997.
    [12]
    JEFFERIES M G, DAVIES M P. Soil classification by the cone penetration test: Discussion[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1991, 28(1): 173-176. doi: 10.1139/t91-023
    [13]
    PINCUS H J, JEFFERIES M G, DAVIES M P. Use of CPTu to estimate equivalent SPT N60[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1993, 16(4): 458. doi: 10.1520/GTJ10286J
    [14]
    BEEN K, JEFFERIES M G. Towards Systematic CPT Interpretation[C]//Proceedings of Wroth Memorial Symposium, Telford Thomas, London, 1992.
    [15]
    ROBERTSON P K, WRIDE C F. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(3): 442-459. doi: 10.1139/t98-017
    [16]
    ZHANG G, ROBERTSON P K, BRACHMAN R W I. Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(5): 1168-1180. doi: 10.1139/t02-047
    [17]
    ROBERTSON P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337-1355. doi: 10.1139/T09-065
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 卢汉青，包卫星，陈锐，郭强，尹严. 基于核磁共振技术的冻融板岩损伤特性试验研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2025(01): 78-86+99 .
    2. 贾朝军，庞锐锋，俞隽，雷明锋，李忠. 基于离散元的岩石冻融损伤劣化机制研究. 岩土力学. 2024(02): 588-600 .
    3. 赵越，司运航，张译丹，赵京禹. 水化-冻融耦合条件下大理岩蠕变损伤本构模型. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2024(01): 231-241 .
    4. 樊赖宇，吴志军，储昭飞，翁磊，王智洋，刘泉声，陈结. 动态冲击下红砂岩蠕变特性及损伤本构模型. 岩土力学. 2024(06): 1608-1622 .
    5. 刘文博，张树光，黄翔，刘轶品. 基于蠕变曲线对称的蠕变模型研究及参数敏感性分析. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(07): 48-56 .
    6. 宋勇军，操警辉，程柯岩，杨慧敏，毕冉，张琨. 砂岩冻结/解冻过程蠕变特性研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2024(06): 93-103 .
    7. 王波，任永政，田志银，马世纪，王军，黄万朋，王灵. 流变扰动条件下岩石微观损伤试验研究. 煤炭学报. 2024(S2): 852-861 .
    8. 杨志全，甘进，樊详珑，朱颖彦，杨溢，丁渝池. 岩石冻融损伤机理研究进展及展望. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(01): 176-188 .
    9. 赵志波. 冻融条件下隧道围岩单轴蠕变力学特性试验及本构模型. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2023(02): 299-305 .
    10. 苗浩东，任富强. 冻融循环作用下不同含水率砂岩抗拉特性研究. 工矿自动化. 2023(05): 133-138+152 .
    11. 闫建兵，张小强，宋选民，王开，姜玉龙，岳少飞. 低围压条件下无烟煤三轴蠕变特性试验研究（英文）. Journal of Central South University. 2023(05): 1618-1630 .
    12. 张卫泽，王琳庆，郭文重，陈雷. 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩三轴蠕变试验及模型研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(04): 137-148 .
    13. 赵越，李磊，闫晗，肖万山，苏艳军. 水化-冻融耦合作用下大理岩单轴蠕变力学特性. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2023(04): 1195-1203 .
    14. 包卫星，卢汉青，郭强，尹严. 新疆高寒炭质板岩隧道围岩冻融劣化特性研究. 工程地质学报. 2023(04): 1213-1224 .
    15. 王丹，冯子军，张子翔. 砂岩的三维非线性损伤蠕变特性. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(10): 139-144 .
    16. 付宏渊，段鑫波，史振宁. 冻融循环下粉砂质泥岩强度劣化特性及细观机理研究. 工程地质学报. 2023(06): 1833-1841 .
    17. 张进元. 冻融作用下公路块石路基损伤特性研究. 青海交通科技. 2023(06): 131-134 .
    18. 王璐. 二次损伤岩石的蠕变研究综述. 工程技术研究. 2022(07): 39-42 .
    19. 唐志强，吉锋，许汉华，冯文凯，何萧. 豫南燕山期花岗岩蠕变特性及非线性蠕变损伤模型. 科学技术与工程. 2022(16): 6421-6429 .
    20. 尹彦波. 不同应变率下冻融损伤大理岩的动态压缩特性研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2022(08): 139-145 .
    21. 马志奇，杨小彬，刘腾辉，李志辉. 粒径大小对颗粒堆积体Burgers模型蠕变参数相似试验研究. 矿业科学学报. 2022(06): 730-737 .
    22. 王飞，高明忠，邱冠豪，汪亦显，周昌台，王之禾. 初始损伤–载荷–冻融作用下红砂岩的孔隙结构及力学特性. 工程科学与技术. 2022(06): 194-203 .

    Other cited types(43)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (179) PDF downloads (81) Cited by(65)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return