Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 43 Issue 1
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
ZHANG Xin-hui, FU Ping, YIN Jian-min, LIU Yuan-kun. In-situ stress characteristics and active tectonic response of Xianglushan tunnel of Middle Yunnan Water Diversion Project[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 130-139. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202101015
Citation: ZHANG Xin-hui, FU Ping, YIN Jian-min, LIU Yuan-kun. In-situ stress characteristics and active tectonic response of Xianglushan tunnel of Middle Yunnan Water Diversion Project[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 130-139. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202101015
shu

In-situ stress characteristics and active tectonic response of Xianglushan tunnel of Middle Yunnan Water Diversion Project

  • Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan430010, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 11, 2020
  • Available Online: December 04, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Xianglushan tunnel of Middle Yunnan Water Diversion Project is a deep buried and long distance tunnel in the complex tectonic geological environment. In order to find out the distribution characteristics of in-situ stress, the results of measured stress by hydraulic fracturing method in 10 boreholes along the tunnel are statistically analyzed. The three principal stress relationships are mainly expressed as SH>SV>Sh, which accords with the strike-slip tectonic characteristics along the tunnel. The in-situ stress of shallow stratum in the project area is mainly affected by the lithology and faults. On the one hand, the horizontal principal stress of hard rock mass is obviously greater than that of soft rock mass. On the other hand, the stress level along the tunnel is relatively lower due to the development of faults. Meanwhile, the difference of mechanical properties in the local section of fault zones makes the horizontal principal stress in shallow stratum discrete. The maximum horizontal principal stress direction of Xianglushan tunnel is distributed in NNE ~ NEE direction. And it is almost parallel to the strike of a series of Holocene active faults along the tunnel and the direction of regional tectonic principal compressive stress, which is in response to the characteristics of focal mechanism solution and wedge block movement in the study area. Based on the measured stress data and the fault slip theory, the active faults along Xianglushan tunnel are in a relatively stable state at present. Among them, Heqing-Eryuan fault is closer to the critical condition of fault sliding. Therefore, with the accumulation of stress in fault zone, the stability of Heqing-Eryuan fault deserves further attention.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (24)
  • [1]
    谢富仁, 陈群策, 崔效锋, 等. 中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2003.

    XIE Fu-ren, CHEN Qun-ce, CUI Xiao-feng, et al. Study on Crustal Stress Environment in Mainland China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2003. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司. 滇中引水工程可行性研究阶段香炉山隧洞线路比选地质专题研究报告[R]. 武汉: 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司, 2013.

    Changjiang Survey Planning and Design Research Co., Ltd. Geological subject study report on route selection of Xianglushan tunnel in feasibility study stage of Yunnan diversion project[R]. Wuhan: Changjiang Survey Planning and Design Research Co., Ltd., 2013. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    阚荣举, 张四昌, 晏凤桐, 等. 我国西南地区现代构造应力场与现代构造活动特征的探讨[J]. 地球物理学报, 1977, 20(2): 96-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX197702001.htm

    KAN Rong-ju, ZHANG Si-chang, YAN Feng-tong, et al. Present tectonic stress field and its relation to the characteristics of recent tectonic activity in southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1977, 20(2): 96-108. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX197702001.htm
    [4]
    崔效锋, 谢富仁, 张红艳. 川滇地区现代构造应力场分区及动力学意义[J]. 地震学报, 2006, 28(5): 451-461. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2006.05.001

    CUI Xiao-feng, XIE Fu-ren, ZHANG Hong-yan. Recent tectonic stress field zoning in Sichuan-Yunnan region and its dynamics interest[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006, 28(5): 451-461. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2006.05.001
    [5]
    BROWN E T, HOEK E. Technical note trends in relationships between measured in-situ stress and depth[J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci and Geomech Abstr, 1978, 15(4): 211-215. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5
    [6]
    赵德安, 陈志敏, 蔡小林, 等. 我国地应力场分布规律统计分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(6): 1265-1271. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.06.024

    ZHAO De-an, CHEN Zhi-min, CAI Xiao-lin, et al. Analysis of the distribution rule of geostress in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(6): 1265-1271. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.06.024
    [7]
    景锋, 盛谦, 张勇慧, 等. 不同地质成因岩石地应力分布规律的统计分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(7): 1877-1883. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2008.07.028

    JING Feng, SHENG Qian, ZHANG Yong-hui, et al. Statistical analysis of geostress distribution laws for different rocks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(7): 1877-1883. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2008.07.028
    [8]
    张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(增刊): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2003S1001.htm

    ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. Strong seismic activities and active blocks in mainland China[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2003, 33(S0): 12-20. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2003S1001.htm
    [9]
    BYERLEE J D. Friction of rock[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1978, 116: 615-626. doi: 10.1007/BF00876528
    [10]
    汤勇. 龙蟠—乔后断裂带晚第四纪活动速率研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2014.

    TANG Yong. A Study on the Slip Rates of Longpan-Qiaohou Fault Zone in Late Quaternary[D]. Beijing: Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    许晶莉. 云南丽江—剑川断裂带活动性研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012.

    XU Jing-li. Study on the Activity of Lijiang-Jianchuan Fault Zone in Yunnan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    魏永明, 魏显虎, 李德文, 等. 滇西北地区鹤庆—洱源断裂带遥感影像特征及活动性分析术[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(2): 234-249.

    WEI Yong-ming, WEI Xian-hu, LI De-wen, et al. Remote sensing imagery features and activity analyses of Heqing-Eryuan fault zone in the northwestern area of Yunnan province[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2017, 37(2): 234-249. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    丰成君, 陈群策, 李国歧, 等. 青藏高原东南缘丽江—剑川地区地应力测量与地震危险性[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(4): 524-534. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.04.009

    FENG Cheng-jun, CHEN Qun-ce, LI Guo-qi, et al. In-situ stress measurement in Lijiang-Jianchuan area and tentative discussion on the seismic hazards on the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2014, 33(4): 524-534. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.04.009
    [14]
    徐锡伟, 程国良, 于贵华, 等. 川滇菱形块体顺时针转动的构造学与古地磁学证据[J]. 地震地质, 2003, 25(1): 61-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200301006.htm

    XU Xi-wei, CHENG Guo-liang, YU Gui-hua, et al. Tectonic and paleomagnetic evidence for the clockwise rotation of the Sichuan-Yunnan Rhombic Block[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2003, 25(1): 61-70. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200301006.htm
    [15]
    LEPOUP P H, HARRISON T M, RYERSON F J, et al. Structural, petrological and thermal evolution of a tertiary ductile strike slip shear zone, Diancangshan, Yunnan[J]. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98: 6715-6743.
    [16]
    范柱国, 李峰, 谈树成, 等. 丽江—大理地区新构造运动特征及环境效应[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2002, 26(1): 6-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200201001.htm

    FAN Zhu-guo, LI Feng, TAN Shu-cheng, et al. The characteristics and environment effects of geotectonic movement in the Lijiang-Dali region[J]. Geotectonic et Metallogenia, 2002, 26(1): 6-9. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200201001.htm
    [17]
    向宏发, 徐锡伟, 虢顺民, 等. 丽江—小金河断裂第四纪以来的左旋逆推运动及其构造地质意义—陆内活动地块横向构造的屏蔽作用[J]. 地震地质, 2002, 24(2): 188-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200202005.htm

    XIANG Hong-fa, XU Xi-wei, GUO Shun-min, et al. Sinistral thrusting along the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault since quaternary and its geologic-tectonic significance-shielding effect of transverse structure of intracontinental active block[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2002, 24(2): 188-198. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200202005.htm
    [18]
    韩源, 张靖. 滇西北地区活动断裂[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990.

    HAN Yuan, ZHANG Jing. Active Faults in Northwest Yunnan[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1990. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    乔学军, 王琪, 杜瑞林. 川滇地区活动地块现今地壳形变特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004, 47(5): 805-811. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200405010.htm

    QIAO Xue-jun, WANG Qi, DU Rui-lin. Characteristics of current crustal deformation of active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2004, 47(5): 805-811. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200405010.htm
    [20]
    王阎昭, 王恩宁, 沈正康, 等. 基于GPS资料约束反演川滇地区主要断裂现今活动速率[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2008, 38(5): 582-597. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200805006.htm

    WANG Yan-zhao, WANG En-ning, SHEN Zheng-kang, et al. Inversion of present activity rate of main faults in Sichuan-Yunnan region based on GPS data constraints[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2008, 38(5): 582-597. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200805006.htm
    [21]
    邓起东, 张裕明, 许桂林, 等. 中国构造应力场特征及其与板块运动的关系[J]. 地震地质, 1979, 1(1): 11-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ197901003.htm

    DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Yu-ming, XU Gui-lin, et al. On the tectonic stress field in China and its relation to plate movement[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1979, 1(1): 11-22. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ197901003.htm
    [22]
    俞鸿年, 卢华复, 张庆龙, 等. 福建东南沿海中、新生代构造应力场的演化及其与板块运动的关系[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 1987, 23(3): 473-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ198703008.htm

    YU Hong-nian, LU Hua-fu, ZHANG Qing-long, et al. The evolution of the meso-cenozoc structural stress field in the southeastern Fu Jian coastal region and its bearing on the plate movement[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science Edition), 1987, 23(3): 473-484. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ198703008.htm
    [23]
    苏恺之, 李方全, 张伯崇, 等. 长江三峡坝区地壳应力与孔隙水压力综合研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1996.

    SU Kai-zhi, LI Fang-quan, ZHANG Bo-chong, et al. Integrated research on the crustal stress and pore water pressure at the dam site of the Three Gorges[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 1996. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    王成虎, 宋成科, 郭启良, 等. 利用原地应力实测资料分析芦山地震震前浅部地壳应力积累[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(1): 102-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201401010.htm

    WANG Cheng-hu, SONG Cheng-ke, GUO Qi-liang, et al. Stress build-up in the shallow crust before the Lushan Earth quake based on the in-situ stress measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(1): 102-114. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201401010.htm
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 张国强，崔臻，颜天佑，张茂础，李建贺. 大埋深调水隧洞穿越活动断裂带变形破坏特征及适应性措施. 长江科学院院报. 2025(01): 152-161 .
    2. 杨继华，崔臻，万伟锋，刘振红，郭卫新. 引黄济宁工程隧洞穿越活动性断裂响应特征研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2025(01): 283-292 .
    3. 王湃，王康，刘清，杨磊，屠文锋，王小龙，杨洋. 考虑保护层特性与重车偏压影响的引水隧洞底板混凝土受力变形特征. 科学技术与工程. 2025(07): 2931-2942 .
    4. 刘振国，王蓥森，郑长洲. 塑性混凝土防渗墙成槽与基坑开挖数值分析. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 1-11 .
    5. 张延杰，浦仕江，周辉，王锦国，吴顺川，丁秀丽. 滇中引水工程安全建设与高效运行关键技术研究若干进展——地下工程. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(02): 333-357 .
    6. 刘人太，马晨阳，杨磊，王博，马红均，陈孟军，马婉琳，屠文锋，鹿伟，谢云鹏. 一种兼具渗透与劈裂功能的复合注浆材料研发与现场试验. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(S2): 3651-3667 .
    7. 涂颖，晏育松，杨建华，章伟鹏，刘达. 深埋隧洞爆破开挖围岩振动能量分布特征与预测. 长安大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 62-71 .
    8. 鲁瑞，冯现大，舒金会，吴文俊，李树忱. 大跨度变截面隧道围岩及中岩柱的稳定性. 济南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 241-246 .
    9. 卢玉斌，池磊，颜仁富. 滇中引水工程香炉山隧洞地应力特征及其活动构造响应. 工程技术研究. 2023(06): 17-19 .
    10. 司晓丽，雷军，谢金池，贾锋，赵书涛，聂金诚. 跨程海活动断裂带隧址区的地应力特征分析. 四川建筑. 2023(03): 154-157 .
    11. 李会芳，赵密，杜修力. 竖向成层介质中标量波传播问题的高精度人工边界条件. 工程力学. 2022(05): 55-64 .
    12. 王淑娟. 跨断层深海隧道衬砌变形规律及加固措施研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(03): 67-75 .
    13. 韩钢，黄书岭，丁秀丽，马旭强，张雨霆，何军. 香炉山隧洞5#支洞应急抢险段围岩参数反演及稳定性分析. 长江科学院院报. 2022(12): 56-61+67 .
    14. 周辉，赵海涛，李坚，赵成伟，刘文博，张传庆，王艳张. 香炉山隧洞龙蟠—乔后断裂带西支蠕滑特性与位错模式. 长江科学院院报. 2022(12): 97-104 .
    15. 韩晓玉，董志宏，付平，刘元坤. 基于HI应变计的首次断裂带岩体地应力监测. 长江科学院院报. 2022(12): 1-7 .
    16. 吕情绪. 保德煤矿地应力测试及分布特征分析. 煤矿机械. 2021(08): 99-102 .
    17. 洪开荣，冯欢欢. 近2年我国隧道及地下工程发展与思考(2019—2020年). 隧道建设(中英文). 2021(08): 1259-1280 .
    18. 亓文斌，田春艳，王飞飞，孟中华. 采矿引起地表塌陷过程中的地应力转移演化规律研究. 有色金属工程. 2021(12): 86-92 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (266) PDF downloads (132) Cited by(27)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return