Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel

ZHANG Wen-gang; HAN Liang; CHEN Zhi-xiong; FENG Li; DING Xuan-ming; LIU Han-long

doi:10.11779/CJGE202001011

Volume 42 Issue 1

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2020 > 42(1): 100-108. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001011

ZHANG Wen-gang, HAN Liang, CHEN Zhi-xiong, FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, LIU Han-long. Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 100-108. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001011

Citation:

PDF (3474 KB)

Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel

ZHANG Wen-gang^{1, 2, 3,},
HAN Liang¹,
CHEN Zhi-xiong¹,
FENG Li¹,
DING Xuan-ming^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Han-long^{1, 2, 3, ,}

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
2.
Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
3.
National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Areas, Chongqing 400045, China

More Information

Received Date: March 06, 2019
Available Online: December 07, 2022

Abstract

Abstract

A shaking table model test on a double-box underground utility tunnel is conducted based on the theory of similarity simulation test to investigate its seismic behavior. In this test, the Taft earthquake spectra, which are adjusted to have the peak accelerations of 0.2g, 0.4g, 0.8g and 1.2g, respectively to consider the effect of various peak ground accelerations (PGAs), are chosen as the input seismic ones. It is concluded that the maximum dynamic earth pressure has a distribution of reverse "W", and the earth pressure field changes at the end of earthquake. On the whole, the maximum acceleration response, with the amplification from 0.5 to 1.5, increases with an increasing input PGA and decreases with depth. According to the time histories of acceleration and the Fourier spectra, the structures and the surrounding soils basically have consistent acceleration response at the same depth, and the amplitude of the soils is greater than that of the structures under the frequency from 15 to 30 Hz. During the earthquake, there is a larger response of bending moment at corners of the structures, which increases with the input PGAs. At the same time, numerical simulations are carried out with ABAQUS to compare with the results obtained from shaking table tests, which suggests that the results obtained from shaking table tests are highly reliable.
- double box utility tunnel,
- shaking table,
- similarity simulation,
- seismic response,
- Taft wave

FullText(HTML)

References (26)

References

[1]	MILIND P D C, RANJITH P G, ZHAO J. Behavior of shallow tunnel in soft soil under seismic conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.040
[2]	STAMOS A A, BESKOS D E. 3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1996, 15(2): 111-118. doi: 10.1016/0267-7261(95)00025-9
[3]	GIL L M, HERNANDEZ E, DE LA FUENTE P. Simplified transverse seismic analysis of buried structures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 21(8): 735-740. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00039-2
[4]	HASHASH Y M A, HOOK J J, SCHMIDT B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
[5]	TATEISHI A. A study on seismic analysis methods in the cross section of underground structures using static finite element method[J]. Structural Engineering, 2005, 22(1): 41-54. doi: 10.2208/jsceseee.22.41s
[6]	CHEN J, SHI X J, LI J. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1400-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.014
[7]	杜修力, 王刚, 路德春. 日本阪神地震中大开地铁车站地震破坏机理分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2016.02.001 DU Xiu-li, WANG Gang, LU De-chun. Earthquake damage mechanism analysis of Dakai metro station by Kobe Earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016, 36(2): 165-171. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2016.02.001
[8]	WANG G, YUAN M, YU M, et al. Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel-soil-surface structure interaction system[J]. Tunnelling Underground Space Technology, 2018, 76: 145-59. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015
[9]	YAN K, ZHANG J, WANG Z, et al. Seismic responses of deep buried pipeline under non-uniform excitations from large scale shaking table test[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2018, 113: 180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.036
[10]	SINGH D K, MANDAL A, KARUMANCHI S R, et al. Seismic behaviour of damaged tunnel during aftershock[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 93: 44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.028
[11]	胡翔, 薛伟辰. 预制预应力综合管廊受力性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(5): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201005008.htm HU Xiang, XUE Wei-chen. Experimental study of mechanical properties of PPMT[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(5): 29-37. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201005008.htm
[12]	施有志, 柴建峰, 林树枝, 等. 地下综合管廊边界条件对地震动力响应影响数值分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 213-225. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160331 SHI You-zhi, CHAI Jian-feng, LIN Shu-zhi, et al. Numerical analysis on influence of boundary conditions on seismic dynamic response of underground utility tunnels[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 213-225. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160331
[13]	JIANG L, CHEN J, JIE L. Seismic response of underground utility tunnels: shaking table testing and FEM analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2010, 9(4): 555-67. doi: 10.1007/s11803-010-0037-x
[14]	MASON H B, TROMBETTA N W, CHEN Z, et al. Seismic soil-foundation-structure interaction observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 48(6): 162-74.
[15]	史晓军, 陈隽, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅰ)——试验方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(1): 147-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201001020.htm SHI Xiao-jun, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅰ): experimental setup[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(1): 147-154. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201001020.htm
[16]	陈隽, 史晓军, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅱ)——试验结果[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(2): 123-130. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201002021.htm CHEN Jun, SHI Xiao-jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅱ): experimental results[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(2): 123-130. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201002021.htm
[17]	蒋录珍, 陈隽, 李杰. 非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅲ)——数值模拟[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(3): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201003005.htm JIANG Lu-zhen, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅲ): numerical simulation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(3): 45-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC201003005.htm
[18]	曹文冉, 田伟, 李春. 双向叠层剪切箱的研制及模型土体振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增刊2): 249-253. CAO Wen-ran, TIAN Wei, LI Chun. Development of 2-D laminar shear box and shaking table tests on model soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(S2): 249-253. (in Chinese)
[19]	国巍, 李绿宇, 邵平. 大型结构地震模拟振动台及台阵的试验精度分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2016, 36(2): 16-21. GUO Wei, LI Lu-yu, SHAO Ping. Precision analysis of large structure seismic experiment utilizing shaking table for earthquake simulation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2016, 36(2): 16-21. (in Chinese)
[20]	陈国兴, 王志华, 左熹, 等. 振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(1): 89-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2010, 32(1): 89-97. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201001017.htm
[21]	刘晶波, 王东洋, 谭辉, 等. 隧道纵向地震反应分析的整体式反应位移法[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(10): 17-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201810003.htm LIU Jing-bo, WANG Dong-yang, TAN Hui, et al. Integral response displacement method for longitudinal seismic response analysis of tunnel structure[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(10): 17-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201810003.htm
[22]	谢礼立, 翟长海. 最不利设计地震动研究[J]. 地震学报, 2003, 25(3): 250-261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200303002.htm XIE Li-li, ZHAI Chang-hai. Study on the severest real ground motion for seismic design and analysis[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2003, 25(3): 250-261. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB200303002.htm
[23]	翟长海, 谢礼立. 抗震结构最不利设计地震动研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(12): 51-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200512009.htm ZHAI Chang-hai, XIE Li-li. The severest design ground motions for seismicdesign and analysisof structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(12): 51-58. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC200512009.htm
[24]	王国波, 袁明智, 苗雨. 结构-土-结构相互作用体系地震响应研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 837-847. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201805010.htm WANG Guo-bo, YUAN Ming-zhi, MIAO Yu. Review of seismic response of structure-soil-structure interaction system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 837-847. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201805010.htm
[25]	史晓军, 陈隽, 李杰. 地下综合管廊大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2008, 28(6): 116-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200806017.htm SHI Xiao-jun, CHEN Jun, LI Jie. Shaking table test on underground utility tunnel[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2008, 28(6): 116-123. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC200806017.htm
[26]	CHEN G X, CHEN S, ZUO X, et al. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76: 13-28.

[1]	XU Youjun, ZHANG zhengxi, ZHANG Chao, LIU Tianyu, ZHANG Xu. Theoretical study on equivalent stiffness of F-type socket joints in rectangular pipe jacking tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 506-515. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231165
[2]	ZHONG Zilan, ZHANG Yabo, HOU Benwei, HAN Junyan, DU Xiuli. Seismic response analysis and damage assessment of urban water supply networks considering influences of crossing pipelines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(5): 964-975. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220201
[3]	YANG Xiao-hui, QIAN Bao, Guo Nan, DING Bao-yan, ZHANG Guo-hua. Influence factors and deformation laws of uneven settlement of a loess-filling foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 207-212. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1037
[4]	JIN Cong-cong, CHI Shi-chun, NIE Zhang-bo. Seismic safety analysis of high earth-rockfill dams based on seismic deformational fragility[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202002015
[5]	LIU Yu-yang, XIE Yong-li, LAI Hong-peng, ZHANG Hong-guang. Influence of foundation settlement on mechanical performance of shear keys of segment joints in immersed tube tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2235-2244. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201512013
[6]	ZHU He-hua, HUANG Bo-qi, LI Xiao-jun, HASHIMOTO Tadashi. Unified model for internal force and deformation of shield segment joints and experimental analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 2153-2160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201412001
[7]	LIU Chengdong, MA Fuheng, DAI Qun. Application of wild value diagnosis technique in dam safety monitoring data analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(11): 1726-1728.
[8]	ZHAO Shangyi, ZHENG Yingren, SHI Weimin, WANG Jinglin. Analysis on safety factor of slope by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 343-346.
[10]	Tan Zhiming, Yao Zukang. Structural Analysis of Concrete Pavements on Soft Subsoils with Differential Settlements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 54-63.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

1.	梁建文, 陈慧芳, 李东桥, 官其铝. 地下十字立交管廊横向抗震分析(Ⅱ)——结果与讨论. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(04)
2.	张秋实，陈柏全. 预制装配式地下综合管廊地震动力响应分析. 工程建设. 2024(01): 34-39 .
3.	黄鑫，赵亮，谭凯旋，南书婷. 综合管廊抗震研究进展. 低温建筑技术. 2024(02): 61-64 .
4.	凌同华，余彬，黄阜，肖南. 预制拼装综合管廊承插式接头扭转力学性能. 应用力学学报. 2024(04): 822-832 .
5.	黄德龙，宗钟凌，汤爱平，刘强. 穿越非均匀土体综合管廊振动台试验研究. 工程力学. 2024(09): 52-68 .
6.	黄德龙，王惠跃，岑航，宗钟凌，刘强，汤爱平，陶夏新. 基于SV波斜入射水平非一致场管廊动力响应研究. 振动与冲击. 2024(24): 190-203 .
7.	任青，赵晓斌，杨涛，邓海明. 阶梯型综合管廊非一致地震激励下的动力响应. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(02): 222-231+239 .
8.	甘霖，郭恩栋，金宇航，刘智，严檬. 考虑接头影响的综合管廊标准段地震响应分析. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(02): 201-209+221 .
9.	潘强，赵丁凤，曹泽伟，钱健，周正龙. 软弱地层综合管廊三维非线性地震反应特性研究. 震灾防御技术. 2023(01): 44-52 .
10.	杨艳敏，李子根，李永庆，徐冉. 装配叠合式单舱管廊模型振动台试验研究. 建筑结构. 2023(13): 28-34 .
11.	高新博，谢渊，姜育科，高玮. 基于微扰动的软土区综合管廊结构与地层参数智能反演研究. 北京交通大学学报. 2023(03): 35-43 .
12.	黄德龙，宗钟凌，刘强，岑航，汤爱平. 水平非均匀场综合管廊地震响应及离散元模拟研究. 特种结构. 2023(05): 30-38 .
13.	付伟庆，聂长强，李茂，王嘉伟，王建. 预制沟道缆线管廊接头受力性能研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2023(06): 2028-2038 .
14.	戎密仁，冯超，庞银萍，陈耀辉，刘喜坤，戎虎仁，马骁. 土体类型差异对大跨度综合管廊抗震性能影响. 河北地质大学学报. 2023(06): 68-74 .
15.	张超哲，刘松玉. 地下空间预制装配式结构研究现状综述. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2022(01): 236-245 .
16.	DENG Bo-tuan，LI Pan，LI Xin，TIAN Jiang-tao，ZHI Bin. Mechanical behavior of underground pipe gallery structure considering ground fissure. Journal of Mountain Science. 2022(02): 547-562 .
17.	惠新杨，丁传海. 结构形式差异对管廊抗震性能的影响分析. 四川水泥. 2022(03): 35-38 .
18.	许立英，吴应雄，田泓. 长周期地震动下软土地基的偏心基础隔震结构振动台试验研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(08): 1-11 .
19.	杨艳敏，徐冉，李永庆，李子根. 全轻页岩陶粒混凝土装配式管廊抗震性能振动台试验研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2022(04): 53-60 .
20.	袁勇，朱力，禹海涛，马华兵，李婷婷. 综合管廊抗震分析研究进展综述. 隧道建设(中英文). 2022(11): 1821-1831 .
21.	李金奎，汪洋. 地下综合管廊地震响应研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2021(09): 3428-3445 .
22.	吴立，苏勇，陈军，韩佳欣，毛庆威，王丹生. 单仓矩形综合管廊地震响应三维有限元分析及试验验证. 土木工程与管理学报. 2021(03): 51-58 .
23.	杨艳敏，范鑫阳，龚玉宝，王勃，陈宇. 不同建造方式管廊结构振动台模型试验研究. 建筑结构. 2020(14): 91-96+67 .

Other cited types(23)

Corresponding author: LIU Han-long, hliuhhu@163.com

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
2.
Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
3.
National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Areas, Chongqing 400045, China

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (457) PDF downloads (220) Cited by(46)

Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

Other cited types(23)

Catalog

Corresponding author: LIU Han-long, hliuhhu@163.com

Related

Model tests on seismic performance of double-box underground utility tunnel

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

Other cited types(23)

Catalog

Corresponding author: LIU Han-long, hliuhhu@163.com

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content