• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
LIU Jie, FENG Shi-guo, LI Tian-bin, WANG Rui-hong, LEI Lan, WANG Fei. Prediction of dynamic response of rock under impact loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 2022-2030. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811008
Citation: LIU Jie, FENG Shi-guo, LI Tian-bin, WANG Rui-hong, LEI Lan, WANG Fei. Prediction of dynamic response of rock under impact loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 2022-2030. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811008

Prediction of dynamic response of rock under impact loads

More Information
  • Received Date: September 11, 2017
  • Published Date: November 24, 2018
  • The existing dynamic response diagram of marble to shock waves is used to verify the applicability and rationality of prediction model and prediction formula for the nonlinear dynamic response of rock under low velocity loading. The applicable conditions of the loading rate waveform function are proposed. Based on the study of the apparent elastic modulus of the fitting coefficient,the impact compaction coefficient a and the impact initial elastic modulus b,as well as the compaction action a1 and slip action a2 of the fractured voids in a rock sample, are proposed, and a=a1+a2,a1>0,a2<0. When it is subjected to the action of loads, the compaction degree of the rock sample and slip action exist simultaneously. In the loading section,|a1|<|a2|,and in the unloading section, |a1|>|a2|. That causes a<0 in the loading stage and a>0 at the unloading section. The loading-unloading rate response ratio β,which represents the ratio of the average tangent modulus of the unloading section to the average tangent modulus of the loading section, is defined. As the value of β increases, the degree of rock damage is also greater. At different frequencies, the sandstone has β≈2 in the loading mode of triangular waves and sine waves. The measured values of strain, deformation rate and energy value of each strain gauge are in good agreement with the calculated ones. It is proved that the nonlinear dynamic response prediction model and prediction formula for rock under low velocity loads have good applicability and rationality in the case of high-speed shock waves with millisecond time variation, which broadens the application range of the prediction formula and model. It is helpful to the design and construction of the project with strict displacement control.
  • [1]
    TUTUNCU A N, PODIO A L, GREGORY A R, et al.Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rocks, part Ⅰ: effect of frequency and strain amplitude[J]. Geophysics, 1998.
    [2]
    GORDON R B, DAVIS L A.Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in imperfectly elastic rock[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1968, 73: 3917-3935.
    [3]
    MCCALL K R, GUYER R A.Equation of state and wave propagation in hysteretic nonlinear elastic material[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(B12): 23887-23897.
    [4]
    席道瑛, 刘斌, 田象燕. 饱和岩石的各向异性及非线性黏弹性响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45(1): 101-111.
    (XI Dao-ying, LIU Bin, TIAN Xiang-yan.Anisotropy and nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of saturated rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2002, 45(1): 101-111. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    焦贵德, 赵淑萍, 马巍, 等. 循环荷载下冻土的滞回圈演化规律[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(7): 1343-1349.
    (JIAO Gui-de, ZHAO Shu-ping, MA Wei, et al.Evolution laws of hysteresis loops of frozen soil under cyclic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1343-1349. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    高文学, 杨军, 黄风雷. 强冲击载荷下岩石本构关系研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2000, 20(2): 165-170.
    (GAO Wen-xue, YANG Jun, HUANG Feng-lei.The constitutive relation of rock under strong impact loading[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2000, 20(2): 165-170. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    刘石, 许金余, 陈腾飞, 等. 基于SHPB试验的岩石动态力学响应分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(5): 992-995.
    (LIU Shi, XU Jin-yu, CHEN Teng-fei, et al.Study on dynamic response of rock based on split hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2013, 9(5) 992-995. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    崔晨光. 冲击荷载下岩石非线性变形与损伤研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2016.
    (CUI Chen-guang.Study on nonlinear deformation and damage of rock under impulse loading[D]. Qinghuangdao: Yanshan University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    刘杰, 李建林, 邓华锋, 等. 宜昌砂岩三角波加载段变形速率预测研究模型[J]. 岩土力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(3): 633-639.
    (LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, DENG Hua-feng, et al.Study of prediction model for triangular wave loading section deformation rate of Yichang sandestone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(3): 633-639. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    刘杰, 李建林, 骆世威, 等. 0.1Hz正弦波不同载荷峰值砂岩位移速率和能量预测[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(4): 566-572.
    (LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, LUO Shi-wei, et al.Displacement rate and energy simulation of sandstone under different peak loadings of 0.1 Hz sine wave[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013, 30(4): 566-572. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    席道瑛, 郑永来, 张涛. 大理岩和砂岩动态本构实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1995, 15(3): 259-266.
    (XI Dao-ying, ZHENG Yong-lai, ZHANG Tao.The experimental research in dynamic constitutive laws of marble and shale[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1995, 15(3): 259-266. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    席道瑛, 郑永来, 张涛. 应力波在砂岩中的衰减[J]. 地震学报, 1995, 17(1): 62-67.
    (XI Dao-ying, ZHENG Yong-lai, ZHANG Tao.The decay of stress wave in the sandstone[J]. Acta Seismologic Sinica, 1995, 17(1): 62-67. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    席军, 余勇, 席道瑛. 大理岩对多次冲击波的非线性动态响应[J]. 岩土力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(1): 2850-2857.
    (XI Jun, YU Yong, XI Dao-ying.Nonlinear dynamic response of marble to repeated shock wave[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(1): 2850-2857. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    刘杰, 胡静, 李建林, 等. 动载作用下砂岩变形速率及能量毫秒级模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(12): 3403-3412.
    (LIU Jie, HU Jing, LI Jian-lin, et al.Study of deformation rate of sandstone under dynamic loading ang energy millisecond simulation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(12): 3403-3412. (in Chinese))
  • Related Articles

    [1]Doubts on the formula for anti overturning stability of gravity retaining walls[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240951
    [2]WANG Yang, ZHU Ming-xing, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, LIN Jing-yang. Characteristics of cumulative deformation and prediction method for pile foundation under cyclic lateral loading considering influences of pile-soil relative stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 220-225. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2048
    [3]JIANG Zhi-wei, LIU Jing-bo, XU Cheng-shun. Prediction method for seismic responses of underground structures in shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(7): 1220-1227. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107006
    [4]LIU Cheng-yu, CHEN Bo-wen, LIN Wei, LUO Hong-lin. Prediction model for settlement caused by damage of underground pipelines and its experimental verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(3): 416-424. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202103003
    [5]XU Lu-chang, RUI Rui, ZHANG Long, SUN Yi, XIA Yuan-you. Prediction formula for surface settlement in double-line tunnel based on trapdoor tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(8): 1470-1476. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201708014
    [6]ZHAO Qian-yu, SUN Rui. A shear-wave velocity discrimination formula for liquefaction applicable to Xinjiang region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 383-388.
    [7]TENG Kai. Evaluation and improvement of formulas for replacement depth under dynamic compaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(7): 994-998.
    [8]M.S.Subrahmanyam, AO Pengkong. Pile length influences on piling formula[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(3): 264-267.
    [9]Lin Yunmei. Study of BQ formula in national standard of quantitative classification for basic quality of rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(4): 481-485.
    [10]Wang Yu-qing, Luan Fang, Han Qing-yu, Li Guo-xin. Formulae for Predicting Liquefaction Potential of Clayey Silt as Derived from a Statistical Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1980, 2(3): 103-112.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 熊金波,左小华,徐文彬. 凸型边坡露天境界外矿体开采稳定性研究. 现代矿业. 2022(05): 64-67+73 .
    2. 王余鹏. 露天弃碴场边坡失稳破坏与防治策略研究——以白鹤山隧道弃碴场为例. 长沙大学学报. 2021(02): 44-49 .
    3. 张嘉凡,高壮,程树范,张慧梅. 煤岩HJC模型参数确定及液态CO_2爆破特性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(S1): 2633-2642 .
    4. 杨建华,代金豪,姚池,蒋水华,姜清辉. 岩石高边坡爆破开挖损伤区岩体力学参数弱化规律研究. 岩土工程学报. 2020(05): 968-975 . 本站查看
    5. 王志,秦文静,张丽娟. 含裂隙岩石注浆加固后静动态力学性能试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(12): 2451-2459 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (305) PDF downloads (171) Cited by(11)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return