Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 40 Issue 10
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
WANG Jian-hua, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, XU Zhen-hao. Dynamic evolution characteristics and prediction of water inflow of karst piping-type water inrush of tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1880-1888. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810015
Citation: WANG Jian-hua, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, XU Zhen-hao. Dynamic evolution characteristics and prediction of water inflow of karst piping-type water inrush of tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1880-1888. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810015
shu

Dynamic evolution characteristics and prediction of water inflow of karst piping-type water inrush of tunnels

  • 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Transportation College, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
    2. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 02, 2017
  • Published Date: October 24, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • A model for karst piping-type water inrush at tunnel site is established, and the dynamic evolution characteristics of water inrush are analyzed. The results show that there is no obvious time effect for the dynamic evolution of karst piping-type water inrush, but the spatial features have the property of phase evolution. The water inrush area can be divided into three typical flow velocity evolution areas: approximate high-velocity stability zone inside the karst pipeline, velocity rising zone near the critical plane and attenuation-low velocity stability zone in the tunnel. Based on the dynamic attenuation law of flow velocity in the inner area of pipeline, the method of limit analysis combined with numerical methods to predict water inflow is put forward, and a prediction system for water inflow is formed. The corresponding model test is designed, and the real-time monitoring of water inflow is carried out. The rationality of the comprehensive prediction method for water inflow is verified.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (19)
  • [1]
    钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956.
    (QIAN Qi-hu.Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(10): 1945-1956. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    石少帅. 深长隧道充填型致灾构造渗透失稳突涌水机理与风险控制及工程应用[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.
    (SHI Shao-shuai.Study on seepage failure mechanism and risk control of water inrush induced by filled disaster structure in deep-long tunnel and engineering applications[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    薛禹群. 关于稳定井流模型和Dupuit公式的讨论[J].水利学报, 2011, 42(10): 1252-1256.
    (XUE Yu-qun.A discussion on steady well flow model and Dupuit formula[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 42(10): 1252-1256. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    杨天鸿, 陈仕阔, 朱万成, 等. 矿井岩体破坏突水机制及非线性渗流模型初探[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(7): 1411-1416.
    (YANG Tian-hong, CHEN Shi-kuo, ZHU Wan-cheng, et al.Water inrush mechanism in mines and nonlinear flow model for fractured rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(7): 1411-1416. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    李利平. 高风险岩溶隧道突水灾变演化机理及其应用研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2009.
    (LI Li-ping.Study on catastrophe evolution mechanism of karst water inrush and its engineering application of high risk karst tunnel[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    陈国庆, 李天斌, 范占锋, 等. 基于不同渗流方程的岩溶隧道涌突水过程模拟[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2011, 38(4): 8-13.
    (CHEN Guo-qing, LI Tian-bin, FAN Zhan-feng, et al.A study of the process simulation of water burst in a karst tunnel based on different seepage equations[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(4): 8-13. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    王建秀, 朱合华, 叶为民. 隧道涌水量的预测及其工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(7): 1150-1152.
    (WANG Jian-xiu, ZHU He-hua, YE Wei-min.Forward and inverse of water inflow into tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(7): 1150-1152. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    王者超, 李术才, 梁建毅, 等. 地下水封石油洞库渗水量预测与统计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(8): 1490-1497.
    (WANG Zhe-chao, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, et al.Prediction and measurement of groundwater flow rate of underground crude oil storage caverns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(8): 1490-1497. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    EL TANI M.Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(1): 49-55.
    [10]
    倪绍虎, 何世海, 汪小刚, 等. 裂隙岩体水力学特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(3): 488-498.
    (NI Shao-hu, HE Shi-hai, WANG Xiao-gang, et al.Hydraulic properties of fractured rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 488-498. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    王媛, 秦峰, 夏志皓. 深埋隧道涌水预测非达西模型及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(9): 1862-1868.
    (WANG Yuan, QIN Feng, XIA Zhi-hao, et al.Non-darcy flow model and numerical simulation for predicting water inflow in deep tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(9): 1862-1868. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    WU Y S.Non-Darcy flow behavior near high-flux injection wells in porous and fractured formations[J]. Development in Water Science, 2005, 52: 221-233.
    [13]
    WU Y S.Numerical simulation of single-phase and multiphase non-Darcy flow in porous and fractured reservoirs[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2002, 49(2): 209-240.
    [14]
    王媛, 顾智刚, 倪小东, 等. 光滑裂隙高流速非达西渗流运动规律的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(7): 1404-1408.
    (WANG Yuan, GU Zhi-gang, NI Xiao-dong, et al.Experimental study of non-darcy water flow through a single smooth fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(7): 1404-1408. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    仵彦卿. 岩土水力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
    (WU Yan-qing.Geohydraulics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [16]
    王健华. 隧道突涌水动态演化特征分析及区域涌水量预测方法[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2016.
    (WANG Jian-hua.Study on flow dynamic evolution characteristics and regional water inflow prediction method of tunnel water inrush[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [17]
    HWANG Jin-hung, LU Chih-chieh.A semi-analytical method for analyzing the tunnel water in?ow[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22(1): 39-46.
    [18]
    李树忱, 冯现大, 李术才, 等. 新型固流耦合相似材料的研制及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2): 281-288.
    (LI Shu-chen, FENG Xian-da, LI Shu-cai, et al.Research and development of a new similar material for solid-fluid coupling and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2): 281-288. (in Chinese))
    [19]
    周毅, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 地下工程流-固耦合试验新技术及其在充填型岩溶管道突水模型试验中的应用[J].岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(7): 1232-1240.
    (ZHOU Yi, LI Shu-cai, LI Li-ping, et al.New technology for fluid-solid coupling tests of underground engineering and its application in experimental simulation of water inrush in filled-type karst conduit[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(7): 1232-1240. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(29)

    1. 尚海敏，崔庆国，于进庆，王钦刚. 岩溶山区某隧道工程突涌水风险分析. 现代隧道技术. 2025(01): 48-55 .
    2. 朱杰兵，吕思清，汪斌，祝永锁. 隧道突涌水灾害缩尺物理模型试验研究综述. 长江科学院院报. 2024(01): 98-106+113 .
    3. 谢艺伟，李开军，张鹏，郭子昊，张翾. 暗河发育区岩溶隧道突涌水洪峰流量估计. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报(中英文). 2024(03): 307-317+323 .
    4. 郑亮，龙贵云，李青青. 互助北山特长隧道涌水量预测研究. 河南科技. 2024(12): 70-73 .
    5. 程小勇. 基于水文地质综合勘察的隧道导水特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(04): 1345-1356 .
    6. 郭宝德，张毅，王新文，陈志高，董志明，蒙彦. 基于决策树模型的岩溶隧道涌水可能性快速判断——以桂河高速泗顶特长隧道为例. 中国岩溶. 2024(05): 1156-1165 .
    7. 田志莹，纪禄凌，李晓逸，刘毓氚，张旭光. 考虑注浆圈作用下断层区隧道涌水量计算. 公路交通科技. 2024(12): 198-205 .
    8. 周彩贵，李景，梁庆国，陈克霖. 水工引水隧洞施工涌水量预测方法对比. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治. 2023(01): 32-44 .
    9. 孟杰，林志斌，林培忠. 应力-渗流-损伤耦合作用下管道型岩溶隧道突水灾变规律研究. 中国岩溶. 2023(02): 351-360 .
    10. 姜同虎，张雷. 西南地区隧道穿越溶蚀沟槽段不良地质处理方案分析. 江西建材. 2023(05): 258-259+264 .
    11. 谢艺伟，陈基武，张鹏，郭子昊，张翾. 下穿岩溶天坑隧道暴雨期涌水量峰值估算方法. 人民长江. 2023(11): 106-113 .
    12. 孙星亮，郭旭柯，司南. 强降雨条件下管道型隐伏溶洞对隧道衬砌结构影响研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2023(11): 1831-1841 .
    13. 罗一鸣，成建梅，徐文杰，巴净慧，黄盛财，段天宇. 西南岩溶区深埋隧洞涌水条件分析及涌水量预测——以滇中引水工程大坡子隧洞为例. 中国岩溶. 2023(06): 1224-1236 .
    14. 王学军. 圆形小断面引水隧洞渗涌水特征分析与控制措施. 铁道建筑技术. 2022(01): 114-118+152 .
    15. 陈仲达，林志，陈相，杨红运，陆原恩，赵益鑫. 基于非线性渗流模型的管道型岩溶隧道突水机理研究. 现代隧道技术. 2022(01): 149-155 .
    16. 傅鹤林，安鹏涛，成国文，李鲒，陈龙，余小辉. 断层与平行隧道空间位置关系对涌水量的影响研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2022(04): 1032-1040 .
    17. 刘博，徐飞，赵维刚，高阳. 隧道工程结构模型试验系统研究综述与展望. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 452-468 .
    18. 程小勇. 水文地质试验在隧道工程地质勘察中的应用及涌水量预测. 公路交通技术. 2022(04): 128-135+142 .
    19. 项琴，朱宏伟，杜义祥，李明骏. 隧道突泥涌水情景构建及演化状态预测模型. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(08): 154-160 .
    20. 寇小勇，樊浩博，李芒原，郎志军，张家奎，高新强，郜现磊，朱正国. 富水岩溶隧道掌子面安全岩柱厚度研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(24): 10706-10717 .
    21. 杨卫领，郭佳奇，黄猛，黄鑫，毋文涛. 爆破与开挖卸荷作用下岩溶隧道突水灾变过程研究. 公路. 2022(10): 432-438 .
    22. 寇学超. 长大富水斜井分区注浆堵水技术研究——以松山隧道通风斜井工程为例. 工程技术研究. 2022(24): 40-44 .
    23. 傅鹤林，李鲒，成国文，安鹏涛. 基于保角映射的断层影响区内隧道涌水量预测. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 86-92 .
    24. 曹正东. 云茂高速公路南寨隧道涌水量监测及沉降观测. 广东公路交通. 2021(01): 53-58 .
    25. 肖学龙，刘国平，李辉，付雪东，程选生. 枫树下隧道全线开挖力学效应研究. 低温建筑技术. 2021(10): 133-137 .
    26. 谭信荣，樊浩博，宋玉香，刘勇，杨海宏. 管道型岩溶隧道衬砌结构受力特征试验研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2021(06): 1847-1856 .
    27. 陈钦安. 大坝渗漏岩溶通道联合注浆封堵技术应用. 水利技术监督. 2020(01): 226-229 .
    28. 任祥，陈游东. 上忙碑隧道岩溶涌突水风险研究. 现代交通技术. 2020(05): 21-26+42 .
    29. 牛伟锋，王克勤，齐跃明. 辛置矿井涌水特征及影响因素分析. 山西焦煤科技. 2019(03): 39-41+51 .

    Other cited types(27)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (311) PDF downloads (280) Cited by(56)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return