Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 39 Issue 11
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201711005
Citation: ZHU Cheng-wei, YING Hong-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1984-1991. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201711005
shu

Analytical solutions for seepage fields of underwater tunnels with arbitrary burial depth

  • 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    3. Engineering Research Center of Urban Underground Development Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310058, China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 14, 2016
  • Published Date: November 24, 2017
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • A summary about the analytical solutions in the literatures for the seepage fields of underwater tunnels is given, whose advantages and disadvantages are pointed out. Based on the governing equation for the steady-state seepage, the analytical solutions for the seepage fields of underwater tunnels are derived rigorously using the conformal mapping method. The water inflow and water pressure distribution for the grouted lined underwater tunnel with arbitrary burial depth can be obtained according to the new solutions. The analytical solutions can be degenerated to two limit cases including the unlined underwater tunnel and the underwater pipeline. A numerical model is established using the software Comsol to validate the newly derived solutions. The effects of the burial depth of tunnel, the permeability of lining and the thickness of lining on the water inflow, the pore water pressure around the lining and the distribution of the total water head are investigated. It is found that the maximum water pressure appears at the top of the lining when the tunnel is buried shallowly, which is opposite for the case with a large burial depth. The average pore pressure and the non-uniform degree of distribution of the pore water pressure around the lining decrease first then increase as the burial depth increases gradually. And for a given working condition, there is a burial depth or thickness of lining, which can make the pore water pressure around the lining distributed uniformly.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (23)
  • [1]
    COLI M, PINZANI A. Tunnelling and hydrogeological issues: a short review of the current state of the art[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(3): 839-851.
    [2]
    NILSEN B. Characteristics of water ingress in Norwegian subsea tunnels[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(3): 933-945.
    [3]
    LEE I M, NAM S W. The study of seepage forces acting on the tunnel lining and tunnel face in shallow tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(1): 31-40.
    [4]
    ARJNOI P, JEONG J H, KIM C Y, et al. Effect of drainage conditions on porewater pressure distributions and lining stresses in drained tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 376-389.
    [5]
    CAO Y, JIANG J, XIE K H, et al. Analytical solutions for nonlinear consolidation of soft soil around a shield tunnel with idealized sealing linings[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 61: 144-152.
    [6]
    BOUVARD M, PINTO N. Aménagement Caprivari-Cahoeira étude en charge[J]. La Houille Blanche, 1969(7): 747-760.
    [7]
    SCHLEISS A J. Design of pervious pressure tunnels[J]. Water Power and Dam Construction, 1986, 38(5): 21-26.
    [8]
    FERNANDEZ G, ALVAREZ J T A. Seepage-induced effective stresses and water pressures around pressure tunnels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(1): 108-128.
    [9]
    LEI S. An analytical solution for steady flow into a ttonnel[J]. Groundwater, 1999, 37(1): 23-26.
    [10]
    HARR M E. Groundwater and seepage[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
    [11]
    应宏伟, 朱成伟, 龚晓南. 考虑注浆圈作用水下隧道渗流场解析解[J]. 浙江大学学报（工学版）, 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. (YING Hong-wei, ZHU Cheng-wei, GONG Xiao-nan. Analytical solution on seepage field of underwater tunnel considering grouting circle[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 2016, 50(6): 1018-1023. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    JOO E J, SHIN J H. Relationship between water pressure and inflow rate in underwater tunnels and buried pipes[J]. Géotechnique, 2014, 64(3): 226.
    [13]
    王建宇. 再谈隧道衬砌水压力 [J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. (WANG Jian-yu. Once more on hydraulic pressure upon lining[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2003, 40(3): 5-9. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    王秀英, 王梦恕, 张 弥. 计算隧道排水量及衬砌外水压力的一种简化方法[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (WANG Xiu-ying, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. A simple method to calculate tunnel discharge and external water pressure on lining[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2004, 28(1): 8-10. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    EL TANI M. Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2003, 18(1): 49-55.
    [16]
    KOLYMBAS D, WAGNER P. Groundwater ingress to tunnels-the exact analytical solution[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2007, 22(1): 23-27.
    [17]
    HUANGFU M, WANG M S, TAN Z S, et al. Analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater circular tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(4): 391-396.
    [18]
    PARK K H, OWATSIRIWONG A, LEE J G. Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: a revisit[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(2): 206-209.
    [19]
    李鹏飞, 张顶立, 赵 勇, 等. 海底隧道复合衬砌水压力分布规律及合理注浆加固圈参数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(2): 280-288. (LI Peng-fei, ZHANG Ding-li, ZHAO Yong, et al. Study of distribution law of water pressure acting on composite lining and reasonable parameters of grouting circle for subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(2): 280-288. (in Chinese))
    [20]
    杜朝伟, 王梦恕, 谭忠盛. 水下隧道渗流场解析解及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增刊2): 3567-3573. (DU Chao-wei, WANG Meng-shu, TAN Zhong-sheng. Analytic solution for seepage field of subsea tunnel and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S2): 3567-3573. (in Chinese))
    [21]
    VERRUIJT A. Complex variable solutions of elastic tunneling problems[R]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1996.
    [22]
    陈俊儒, 王星华. 海底隧道涌水量的预测及其应用研究[J].现代隧道技术, 2008, 45(5): 18-27. (CHEN Jun-ru, WANG Xing-hua. Prediction and research on water inflow for a subsea tunnel[J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2008, 45(5): 18-27. (in Chinese))
    [23]
    王育奎, 徐帮树, 李树才, 等. 海底隧道涌水量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(9): 1477-1482. (WANG Yu-kui, XU Bang-shu, LI Shu-cai, et al. Laboratory method tests on water flow rate of submarine tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(9): 1477-1482. (in Chinese))
    本期广告索引
    24 封2 北京理正软件股份有限公司
    25 封3 重庆地质仪器厂
    26 封4 南瑞集团水利水电技术分公司
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHI Shichun, WANG Tengteng, JIA Yufeng. Delayed crushing time for particles of rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(12): 2602-2609. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230074
    [2]HAN Hua-qiang, CHEN Sheng-shui, FU Hua, ZHENG Cheng-feng. Particle breakage of rockfill materials under cyclic loadings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1753-1760. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201710001
    [3]CHANG Li-ying, CHEN Qun, YE Fa-ming. Particle flow simulation for contact erosion between uniform particles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 312-317. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2051
    [4]HAN Hong-xing, CHEN-Wei, QIU Zi-feng, FU Xu-dong. Numerical simulation of two-dimensional particle flow in broken rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 234-239. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2038
    [5]CAI Zheng-yin, LI Xiao-mei, HAN Lin, GUAN Yun-fei. Critical state of rockfill materials considering particle gradation and breakage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(8): 1357-1364. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201608001
    [6]CAI Zheng-yin, LI Xiao-mei, GUAN Yun-fei, HUANG Ying-hao. Particle breakage rules of rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 923-929. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201605019
    [7]LIU Si-hong, HUANG Ming-kun, WANG Zi-jian, KONG Wei-yao, XIE Hao, WANG Yi-shu. Simple shear tests on breakable rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(8): 1503-1508. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201508021
    [8]CONG Yu, WANG Zai-quan, ZHENG Ying-ren, FENG Xia-ting. Experimental study on microscopic parameters of brittle materials based on particle flow theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(6): 1031-1040. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201506009
    [9]CHEN Sheng-shui, FU Zhong-zhi, HAN Hua-qiang, PENG Cheng. An elastoplastic model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1489-1495.
    [10]KONG Dezhi, ZHANG Bingyin, SUN Xun. Triaxial tests on particle breakage strain of artificial rockfill materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(3): 464-469.
    • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 童小东，陈文义，慈祥，孙任运，黎冰. 生物高分子聚合物固化沙漠砂室内试验研究. 工程力学. 2025(03): 68-76 .
    2. 王钰轲，陈浩，宋迎宾，王振海，钟燕辉，张蓓. 大豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙固化黄河泥沙水稳定性试验研究. 水利学报. 2024(01): 71-79 .
    3. 亓永帅，高玉峰，何稼，周云东，严柏杨. 可溶性大豆多糖对大豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积固化风积沙效果的影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(04): 823-832 . 本站查看
    4. 倪静，韩晓婷，贺青青，耿雪玉. 黄原胶-粉煤灰联合处理酸污染土试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(04): 111-118 .
    5. 王欢，张佳伟，郭合家. EICP改良膨胀土的物理力学性质试验研究. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2024(05): 109-116 .
    6. 董旭光，方礼鑫，马渊博，胡倩倩，李瑞瑞. 大豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙固化黄土的强度试验研究. 地震工程学报. 2024(05): 1009-1020 .
    7. 褚文杰，李驰，武慧敏，高瑜. 土豆脲酶提取及基于酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术对风积沙改良的方法. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2023(02): 74-80 .
    8. 吕家栋，赵立财. 黄原胶改善黏土断裂性能研究. 人民长江. 2023(04): 205-210+217 .
    9. 任廷婕，袁立敏，高永，王春颖，徐艳艳. 环保型固沙材料的研究进展. 中国沙漠. 2023(03): 160-168 .
    10. 张建伟，李想，石磊，尹悦. 废弃口罩对EICP固化砂土力学特性的影响. 河南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 359-366 .
    11. 陆爱灵，朱东云，张宏，曹函，张婧. EICP联合生物炭固化修复重金属污染土试验. 环境工程. 2023(08): 176-180 .
    12. 袁嘉茂，高永，李婉娇，任怀新，吴振亮. 生物诱导碳酸钙土体固化技术在防沙领域研究进展. 广东水利水电. 2023(09): 75-80 .
    13. 王灏喆，武钢义，代育恒，黄灿，常少华. 基于响应面法的EICP-PVA固化粉砂土优化试验研究. 公路. 2023(11): 264-272 .
    14. 赵轩，刘光宇，胡天林，赵璧，吕刚锋. EICP固化砂土强度特性试验研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 114-121 .
    15. 刘津江，王淼，樊敏，刘西周. 产脲酶微生物的筛选和应用研究进展. 生物技术. 2022(01): 107-113+119 .
    16. 徐银龙，郑文杰，王琳，薛中飞，谢毅鑫. 壳聚糖联合酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀处理铜废水的劣化现象和强化机理研究. 化工学报. 2022(05): 2222-2232 .
    17. 曹光辉，刘士雨，蔡燕燕，俞缙，孙志龙. 靶向激活产脲酶微生物联合酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀加固陆域吹填海砂试验研究. 岩土力学. 2022(08): 2241-2252 .
    18. 郑文杰，胡文乐，袁可，文少杰. 脲酶矿化作用机制及其提升仿古黏土砖瓦阻水性能研究. 岩土力学. 2022(S2): 255-264 .
    19. 范广才，缪林昌，孙潇昊，王恒星，吴林玉. 脲酶抑制剂对EICP防风固沙效果的影响研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(05): 1019-1027 .
    20. 原华，刘帅星，刘康. EICP联合Na-Mt固化粉砂抗剪特性. 中国科技论文. 2022(12): 1358-1362+1375 .
    21. 王磊，王博，刘志强，常新昊. 基于脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀的土体固化研究进展. 工业建筑. 2022(11): 57-66 .
    22. 原华，刘康，原耀楠，冯佳星. 大豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀的多因素影响分析. 人工晶体学报. 2021(02): 375-380 .
    23. 何想，刘汉龙，韩飞，马国梁，赵常，楚剑，肖杨. 微生物矿化沉积时空演化的微流控芯片试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(10): 1861-1869 . 本站查看
    24. 曹光辉，刘士雨，俞缙，蔡燕燕，胡洲，毛坤海. 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀（EICP）技术及其在岩土工程中的应用. 高校地质学报. 2021(06): 754-768 .
    25. 何稼，吴敏，孟浩，亓永帅，高玉峰. 生物固土用于防风固沙的研究进展. 高校地质学报. 2021(06): 687-696 .

    Other cited types(23)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (402) PDF downloads (430) Cited by(48)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return