• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
CHEN Jian-feng, ZHANG Wan. Numerical modeling of a reinforced soil segmental retaining wall designed using the K-stiffness method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1004-1011. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706005
Citation: CHEN Jian-feng, ZHANG Wan. Numerical modeling of a reinforced soil segmental retaining wall designed using the K-stiffness method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1004-1011. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706005

Numerical modeling of a reinforced soil segmental retaining wall designed using the K-stiffness method

More Information
  • Received Date: March 01, 2016
  • Published Date: June 24, 2017
  • A finite difference numerical model is established for a reinforced segmental retaining wall (SRW) designed using the K-stiffness method. The hyperbolic interface model is used to actually simulate the block-leveling pad and leveling pad-foundation interface. The behaviors of the field wall under working stress are investigated, and the shear characteristics of the toe interface are further analyzed. The results show that the computed reinforcement strain distribution, the maximum reinforcement loads in the fill, the connection loads and the maximum facing displacements are in agreement with the measurements. The maximum reinforcement loads in the fill computed using the K-stiffness method agree well with those computed by numerical model and the measured. However, the K-stiffness method cannot be used for verification of the connection loads because the connection loads are larger than the maximum reinforcement loads in the fill due to the effect of the down-drag force mobilized by foundation settlement and backfill compaction. Compared to the SRWs on the rigid foundation, the walls on the compressible foundation have larger factors of normal toe loads and less fractions of the total loads carried by the toe. The leveling pad will not slide along its interface with the foundation due to very small shear stress on it, although the shear stiffness of the leveling pad-foundation interface is much less than that of the block-leveling pad interface. Thus, the block-leveling pad interface plays a major role in the toe restraint.
  • [1]
    AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications[S]. 6th ed. Washington D C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2012.
    [2]
    GB 50209—98 土工合成材料应用技术规范[S]. 1998. (GB50209—98 Technical standard of application of geosynthetics[S]. 1998. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    BATHURST R J, ALLEN T M, WALTERS D L. Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method[J]. Geotexitiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(4): 287-322.
    [4]
    BATHURST R J, MIYATA Y, NERNHEIM A, et al. Refinement of K -stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(4): 269-295.
    [5]
    ALLEN T M, BATHURST R J, HOLTZ R D, et al. A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40: 976-994.
    [6]
    ALLEN T M, ASCE, BATHURST R J. Design and performance of 6.3-m-high, block-faced geogrid wall designed using K -stiffness method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 140(2): 04013016.
    [7]
    BATHURST R J, WALTERS D, VLACHOPOULOS N, et al. Full scale testing of geosynthetic reinforced walls[M]// ZORNBERG J, CHRISTOPHER B R, eds. Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems using Geosynthetics. Denver, 2000: 201-217.
    [8]
    HUANG B Q, BATHURST R J, HATAMI K. Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(8): 885-904.
    [9]
    LESHCHINSKY D. Discussion on ‘‘The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls’’[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2007, 44(12): 1479-1482.
    [10]
    LESHCHINSKY D, VAHEDIFARD F. Impact of toe resistance in reinforced masonry block walls: design dilemma[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(2): 236-240.
    [11]
    陈建峰. 基于墙趾真实约束条件的模块式加筋土挡墙数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. (CHEN Jian-feng. Numerical modeling of reinforced soil segmental walls under real toe restraint conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    HATAMI K, BATHURST R J. Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 1066-1085.
    [13]
    LADE P V, LEE K L. Engineering properties of soils[R]. Los Angeles: University of California, 1976.
    [14]
    CHEN J F, YAN Y, BATHURST R J. Influence of leveling pad interface properties on soil reinforcement loads for walls on rigid foundations[C]// Proceedings of GeoShanghai International Conference 2014. Reston, 2014: 481-492.
    [15]
    NERNHEIM A, HUANG B, BATHURST R J. Using synthetic data from numerical modeling to verify the K -stiffness method for reinforced soil walls[C]// Proceedings of the 4th European Geosynthetics Conference. Edinburg, 2008: 1-8.
    [16]
    EHRLICH M, MIRMORADI S H. Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls[J]. Geotexiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 40: 28-36.
    [17]
    TAJIRI N, SASAKI H, NISHIMURA J, et al. Full-scale failure experiments of geotextile-reinforced soil walls with different facings[C]// Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement. Rotterdam, 1996: 525-530.

Catalog

    Article views (349) PDF downloads (201) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return