Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 38 Issue z2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
WANG Ming-yuan, SHAN Zhi-gang, SONG Wei-kang, DI Sheng-jie, HU Sheng-gang, CHEN Fan-fan. Experimental study on resistance of pull-out cone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 167-171. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2027
Citation: WANG Ming-yuan, SHAN Zhi-gang, SONG Wei-kang, DI Sheng-jie, HU Sheng-gang, CHEN Fan-fan. Experimental study on resistance of pull-out cone penetration tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 167-171. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2027
shu

Experimental study on resistance of pull-out cone penetration tests

  • 1. HydroChina Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou 310012, China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
    3. Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute(CRSRI), Wuhan 430010, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 18, 2016
  • Published Date: October 19, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • To investigate change of resistance of pull-out cone penetration tests, pull-out tests are performed on clayey soil and sand in a new large-scale model chamber under controlled conditions. The effects of edge angle, edge length, pull-out rate, compactness and relative densities on the evolution of pull-out resistance are highlighted. The results show that the change of pull-out resistance can be divided into three stages: sharp-increases stage, slow-increase stage and stabilization. The pull-out resistance increases along with the increase of edge angle. The increasing rate of pull-out resistance at early stage of tests and the ultimate value of pull-out resistance become larger and larger as the increase of edge length. The pull-out resistance and its maximum value also increases as the increase of pull-out rate, compactness and relative densities. However, there is no obviously linear relationship between the maximum pull-out resistance and the compactness. The increase of pull-out resistance is slow at low compactness and relative densities while it is fast when the compactness and relative densities become large.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (10)
  • [1]
    吴道祥, 单灿灿, 钟轩明, 等. 静力触探的发展及其在岩土工程中的应用[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 31(2): 211-215. (WU Dao-xiang, SHAN Can-can, ZHONG Xuan-ming, et al. Development of CPT and its application in geotechnical engineering[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology, 2008, 31(2): 211-215. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    吴波鸿. 静力触探在渤海某海上平台场址工程勘察中的应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2008. (WU Hong-bo. The application of cone penetration test in bohai offshore platform site inestigation[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2008. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    石要红. 海底土体静力触探关键技术研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2005. (SHI Yao-hong. The key technology research of the cone penetration test (CPT) on seabottom[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    梁文成, 林吉兆, 杜 宇. 海床式静力触探设备在海上工程勘察中的应用[J]. 水运工程, 2013, 7: 19-21. (LIANG Wen-cheng, LIN Zhao-ji, DU Yu. Application of seabed CPTU equipment in offshore investigation[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2013, 7: 19-21. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    ROSQUOET F, THOREL L, GARNIER J, et al. Lateral cyclic loading of sand-installed piles[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2007, 47(5): 821-832.
    [6]
    杜 宇, 黄志伟. CPTU数据与土体物理指标的相关性分析[J]. 水运工程, 2013, 7: 26-29. (DU Yu, HUANG Zhi-wei. Correlation analysis of CPTU data and soil physical parameters[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2013, 7: 26-29. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    COSTES N C, MITCHELL J K. Apollo 11 soil mechanics investigation[C]// Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Science Conference. Houston, 1970.
    [8]
    蒋明镜, 王新新. 不同贯入倾角下TJ-1模拟月壤静力触探模型箱试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(8): 1442-1450. (JIANG Ming-jing, WANG Xin-xin. Investigation of TJ-1 lunar soil simulant cone penetration tests by calibration chamber under different penetration angles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(8): 1442-1450. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    蒋明镜, 戴永生, 王新新, 等. 一种静力触探模型箱试验装置的研制及其试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(7): 2110-2117. (JIANG Ming-jing, DAI Yong-sheng, WANG Xin-xin, et al. Development of a calibration chamber for cone penetration test and corresponding experimental research[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(7): 2110-2117. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    徐锦斌. 静力触探锥头阻力与软土强度相关性分析[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2014. (XU Jin-bin. Correlative analysis between cone tip resistance of CPT and soil strength[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2014. (in Chinese))
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李立辰，刘卓，刘浩，吴文兵，罗仑博，蒋国盛，梅国雄. 考虑土塞效应的开口管桩沉桩与承载全过程离散元分析. 岩土工程学报. 2024(07): 1471-1480 . 本站查看
    2. 倪志. 基于静力触探测试的深基坑工程土体设计参数应用研究. 建筑技术开发. 2023(03): 152-154 .
    3. 陈磊. 基于静力触探测试的深基坑工程土体设计参数应用研究. 广东建材. 2023(04): 72-75 .
    4. 郭丽丽. 静力触探技术在中华长城博物馆土地基承载力评估中的应用. 砖瓦. 2022(06): 65-67+70 .
    5. 栾尧正，杨泽讯，王佳俊. 基于静力触探试验的数值模拟研究. 工程机械与维修. 2022(05): 218-220 .
    6. 赵腾跃，梁胜，候捷，张晨，卞海丁，姚伟伟. 基坑开挖施工时邻近桩基侧向变形分析. 施工技术(中英文). 2022(19): 40-45 .
    7. 王磊，俞峰，潘静杰. 敞口管型桩压入对既有受荷桩基承载性状影响. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2021(12): 2243-2251 .
    8. 王磊，俞峰，王子郡. 黏性土中钢管桩承载力的静力触探设计方法. 工业建筑. 2021(10): 163-169 .
    9. 刘路路，蔡国军，耿功巧，刘松玉. 考虑土塞效应的开口管桩承载力CPTU计算方法. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(02): 280-285 .
    10. 陈伟，谢建斌，赵一锦，孙孝海，叶海涵，林煌超. 饱和沙土中高频液压振动沉桩敏感性因素分析. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(02): 214-218 .
    11. 唐德康. 上海某深基坑降水抽水试验研究. 佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(03): 363-366 .
    12. 汪志涛，蓝天鹏，张明瑞. 钢钎静探设备的研制及其在输电线路工程勘察中的应用. 工程与建设. 2019(05): 737-739 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(21)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return