• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
JIA Zhe-qiang, ZHANG Ru, ZHANG Yan-fei, GAO Ming-zhong, LIU Qian-ying, LI An-qiang, XIE Jing. Integrated prediction for rockburst of underground powerhouse of Houziyan hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 110-116. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2018
Citation: JIA Zhe-qiang, ZHANG Ru, ZHANG Yan-fei, GAO Ming-zhong, LIU Qian-ying, LI An-qiang, XIE Jing. Integrated prediction for rockburst of underground powerhouse of Houziyan hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(z2): 110-116. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2018

Integrated prediction for rockburst of underground powerhouse of Houziyan hydropower station

More Information
  • Received Date: May 18, 2016
  • Published Date: October 19, 2016
  • The underground powerhouse of Houziyan hydropower station under construction in southwest China has the characteristics of a large span and high sidewall. It lies in high geo-stress regions and its maximum measured geo-stress has reached to 36.43 MPa. The complete and hard limestone in this region has a high brittleness and provides a high energy storage condition, which is possible to result in dynamic geological disasters like rockburst because of the excavation disturbance. Based on the integrated prediction approach for rockburst, a research on rockburst tendency is conducted. Considering the strict simulation of topographical and geological conditions, a three-dimensional finite element model for Houziyan underground powerhouse is established. Then the step-by-step excavation process of underground powerhouse is simulated. And the initial geo-stress regression analysis is finished using method of back analysis. Wang Lansheng criterion is selected to evaluate the rockburst tendency. The rockburst tendency prediction of main powerhouse, main transformer chamber and tailrace surge chamber during step-by-step excavation process are analyzed. The results show that the light rockburst occurs during excavation of the underground caverns, and medium rockburst only happens in some areas. There are still some differences between the predicted results and the real situations. At the same time, a summary on various criteria of rockburst prediction and a discussion on the applicability of these criteria based on the existing engineering data are also carried out. It is indicated that there are some limitations using a single criterion to predict the actual projects. The predicted results by using five-factor rockburst criterion can reflect the actual situation more accurately.
  • [1]
    张镜剑, 傅冰骏. 岩爆及其判据和防治[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(10): 2034-2042. (ZHANG Jing-jian, FU Bing-jun. Rockburst and its criteria and control[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(10): 2034-2042. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    徐林生, 王兰生, 李永林. 岩爆形成机制与判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2002, 23(3): 300-303. (XU Lin-sheng, WANG Lan-sheng, LI Yong -lin. Study on mechanism and judgement of rockbursts[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(3): 300-303. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    张艳飞, 李治国, 张 茹, 等. 猴子岩水电站地下厂房岩爆倾向性研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48: 42-49. (ZHANG Yan-fei, LI Zhi-guo, ZHANG Ru, et al. Rockburst tendency research in underground powerhouse of Houziyan hydropower station[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48: 42-49. (in Chinese))
    [4]
    郭怀志, 马启超, 薛玺成, 等. 岩体初始地应力场的分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1983, 5(3): 64-75. (GUO Huai-zhi, MA Qi-chao, XUE Xi-cheng, et al. The analytical method of the initial stress field for rock masses[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 5(3): 64-75. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    何江达, 谢红强, 王启智, 等. 官地水电站坝址区初始地应力场反演分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(2): 166-171. (HE Jiang-da, XIE Hong-qiang, WANG Qi-zhi, et al. Inversion analysis of initial geostress in dam site of Guandi hydropower project[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(2): 166-171. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    陈卫忠, 吕森鹏, 郭小红, 等. 基于能量原理的卸围压试验与岩爆判据研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(8): 1530-1540. (CHEN Wei-zhong, LU Sen-peng, GUO Xiao-hong, et al. Reasearch on unloading confining pressure tests and rockbhurst criterion based on energy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(8): 1530-1540. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    HE Man-chao, SOUSA R E, MIRANDA T, et al. Rockburst laboratory testsdatabase-Application of data mining techniques[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 185: 116-130.
    [8]
    谷明成, 何发亮, 陈成宗. 秦岭隧道岩爆的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(9): 1324-1329. (GU Ming-cheng, HE Fa-liang, CHEN Cheng-zong. Study on rockburst in Qingling tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(9): 1324-1329. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    ZHANG Jing-jian, FU Bing-jun, LI Zhong-kui, et al. Criterion and classification for strain mode rockbursts based on five-factor comprehensive method[J]. News Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 88(1): 27-37.
    [10]
    王兰生. 二郎山隧道高地应力与围岩稳定问题[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2006. (WANG Lan-sheng. High geostress and surrounding rock stability in Erlang-mountain highway tunnel[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    武选正, 李名川, 伍宇腾. 锦屏水电枢纽辅助洞工程岩爆现象分析及防治措施[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(3): 28-33. (WU Xuan-zheng, LI Ming-chuan, WU Yu-teng. Analysis and prevention measures for rock-burst in the auxiliary tunnel of the Jinping hydropower state[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2008, 38(3): 28-33. (in Chinese))

Catalog

    Article views (314) PDF downloads (480) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return