• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
CHEN Jian-feng. Numerical modeling of reinforced soil segmental retaining walls under real toe restraint conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201409010
Citation: CHEN Jian-feng. Numerical modeling of reinforced soil segmental retaining walls under real toe restraint conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201409010

Numerical modeling of reinforced soil segmental retaining walls under real toe restraint conditions

More Information
  • Received Date: October 17, 2013
  • Published Date: September 21, 2014
  • The toe restraint has a significant effect on the behaviour of hard facing reinforced soil retaining walls (RSWs). A non-linear hyperbolic interface model is established based on shear stress-displacement curves from modular block-grading gravel interface shear tests. A 3.6 m-high polypropylene geogrid reinforced soil wall on rigid foundation is simulated under working stress conditions using FLAC incoperated with the interface model. The shear properties of the toe interface, the horizontal displacements of the wall facing and toe block as well as the loads carried by the toe and reinforcements are then analyzed. The results show that the shear stress-dispalcement curve of the toe interface exhibits concave during wall construction. The interface normal stress, interface shear stiffness and loads carried by the toe and reinforcements increase with the wall height during construction. When the wall is constructed up to 3.6 m in height, the interface normal stress is 1.7 times the self-weight of wall facing blocks and approximately 87% of the total loads are carried by the toe. The displacments of the wall facing and toe block increase apparently during the initial stage of wall construction due to less shear stiffness of the toe interface. Compared to the constant toe restraint stiffness used in the former laboratory tests and numerical modeling of RSWs, the hyperbolic interface model can better reflect shear properties of the toe and foundation soils.
  • [1]
    AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications[S]. 5th ed. Washington D C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010.
    [2]
    NCMA. Design manual for segmental retaining walls[S]. 5th ed. BERNARDI M, HERNDON Va. National Concrete Masonry Association, 2012.
    [3]
    BSI. British Standard BS8006. Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soil and other fills[S]. Milton Keynes: British Standards Institution, 2010.
    [4]
    GB 50209—98 土工合成材料应用技术规范[S]. 1998. (GB 50209—98 Technical standard of application of geo- synthetics[S]. 1998. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    BATHURST R J, ALLEN T M, WALTERS D L. Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(4): 287-322.
    [6]
    BATHURST R J, MIYATA Y, NERNHEIM A, et al. Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(4): 269-295.
    [7]
    BATHURST R J, WALTERS D, VLACHOPOULOS N, et al. Full scale testing of geosynthetic reinforced walls[C]// ZORNBERG J, CHRISTOPHER B R, eds. ASCE Special Publication No. 103, Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems using Geosynthetics. Denver, ASCE, 2000: 201-217.
    [8]
    HUANG B, BATHURST R J, HATAMI K. Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(8): 885-904.
    [9]
    HATAMI K, BATHURST R J. Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 1066-1085.
    [10]
    HATAMI K, BATHURST R J. A numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 132(6): 673-684.
    [11]
    HUANG B, BATHURST R J, HATAMI K. Numerical study of reinforced soil segmental walls using three different constitutive soil models[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2009, 135(10): 1486-1498.
    [12]
    ASTM D6916—03 Standard test method for determining shear strength between segmental concrete units (modular concrete blocks)[S]. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2958 USA.
    [13]
    Results of design PRO LANDSCAPE block direct sliding capacity testing[R]. Bathurst: Clarabut Geotechnical Testing, Inc, 2007.
    [14]
    CLOUGH G W, DUNCAN J M. Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior[J]. J Soil Mech Found Div, ASCE, 1971, 97(SM12): 1657-1673.
    [15]
    BOSCARDIN M D, SELIG E T, LIN R S, et al. Hyperbolic parameters for compacted soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(1): 343-375.
    [16]
    ROWE K R, HO S K. Continuous panel reinforced soil walls on rigid foundations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1997, 123(10): 912-920.
    [17]
    DAMIANS I P, BATHURST R J, JOSA A, et al. Vertical facing loads in steel reinforced soil walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2013, 139(5): 1419-1432.

Catalog

    Article views (392) PDF downloads (394) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return