• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
DUAN Jian, YAN Zhi-xin. Natural frequency and parameter influence of slope anchorage system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(6): 1051-1056. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201406009
Citation: DUAN Jian, YAN Zhi-xin. Natural frequency and parameter influence of slope anchorage system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(6): 1051-1056. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201406009

Natural frequency and parameter influence of slope anchorage system

More Information
  • Received Date: September 11, 2013
  • Published Date: June 19, 2014
  • According to some assumptions, the dynamic mechanical model for slope anchorage system is established for free vibration. Some formulas for the natural frequency and the corresponding vibration modes of anchorage system are deduced. Compared to that of the other methods, the feasibility of the theoretical formulas is verified through a specific example. Meanwhile, the natural frequency of slope anchorage system is analyzed under the influence of different parameters, anchor length, equivalent lumped mass and stiffness coefficient . The inherent laws between them are discussed. It is found that the anchor length and the value of stiffness coefficient have less effect on the low-order natural frequency, and their impact on the size of high-order natural frequency is larger. The equivalent lumped mass has less effect on the natural frequency of slope anchorage system. The slope anchorage system has the natural frequency of linear vibration mode under certain conditions.
  • [1]
    周德培, 张建经, 汤涌. 汶川地震中道路边坡工程震害分析[J]. 岩石力学及工程学报, 2010, 29(3): 565-576. (ZHOU De-pei, ZHANG Jian-jing, TANG Yong. Seismic damage analysis of road slopes in Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(3): 565-576. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    IVANOVIĆ A, NEILSON R D, RODGER A A. Lumped parameter modelling of single-tendon ground anchorage systems[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 149(2): 103-113.
    [3]
    IVANOVIĆ A, STARKEY A, NEILSON R D, et al. The influence of load on the frequency response of rock bolt anchorage[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2003, 34(11): 697-705.
    [4]
    董建华, 朱彦鹏. 土钉土体系统动力模型的建立及地震响应分析[J]. 力学学报, 2009, 41(2): 236-242. (DONG Jian-hua, ZHU Yan-peng. Dynamic calculation model and seismic response for the system of soil nailing and surrounding soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2009, 41(2): 236-242. (in Chinese))
    [5]
    董建华, 朱彦鹏, 马巍. 框架预应力锚杆边坡支护结构动力计算方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(5): 250-258. (DONG Jian-hua, ZHU Yan-peng, MA Wei. Study on dynamic calculation method for frame supporting structure with pre-stress anchors[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(5): 250-258. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    叶海林, 郑颖人, 黄润秋, 等. 锚杆支护岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. 后勤工程学院学报, 2010, 26(4): 1-7. (YE Hai-lin, ZHENG Ying-ren, HUANG Run-qiu, et al. Analysis on dynamic response of rockbolt in rock slope under earthquake[J]. Journal of Logistical Engineering University, 2010, 26(4): 1-7. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    叶海林, 黄润秋, 郑颖人, 等. 岩质边坡锚杆支护参数地震敏感性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(9): 1374-1379. (YE Hai-lin, HUANG Run-qiu, ZHENG Ying-ren, et al. Sensitivity analysis of parameters for bolts in rock slopes under earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(9): 1374-1379. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    HONG Yung-shan, CHEN Rong-her, WU Cho-sen, et al. Shaking table tests and stability analysis of steep nailed slopes[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(5): 1264-1279.
    [9]
    张明聚, 吕琦, 李立云, 等. 土钉支护边坡动力性能参数分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(11): 1758-1763. (ZHANG Ming-ju, LÜ Qi, LI Li-yun, et al. Parametric analysis for a seismic behavior of soil nailing system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(11): 1758-1763. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    文畅平, 杨果林. 格构式框架护坡地震动位移模式的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(10): 2076-2083. (WEN Chang-ping, YANG Guo-lin. Shaking table model test study of seismic displacement mode of slope with anchor lattice frame structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(10): 2076-2083. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    叶海林, 郑颖人, 陆新, 等. 边坡锚杆地震动特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(增刊): 152-157. (YE Hai-lin, ZHENG Ying-ren, LU Xin, et al. Shaking table test on anchor bars of slope under earthquake[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(S0): 152-157. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    LYSMER J, RICHART F E. Dynamic response of footing to vertical loading[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1966, 92(1): 65-91.
    [13]
    NOVAK M, NOGAMI T, ABOUL-ELLA F. Dynamic soil reaction for plain strain case[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1978, 104(4): 953-959.
    [14]
    王腾, 王奎华, 谢康和. 成层土中桩的纵向振动理论研究及应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2002, 35(1): 83-87. (WANG Teng, WANG Kui-hua, XIE Kang-he. Study on vibration properties of piles in layered soils[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2002, 35(1): 83-87. (in Chinese))
    [15]
    倪振华. 振动力学[M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 1990. (NI Zhen-hua. Vibration mechanics[M]. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 1990. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(26)

    1. 刘新荣,罗新飏,郭雪岩,周小涵,王浩,许彬,郑颖人. 巫山段岸坡水岩劣化特征及危岩失稳破坏模式. 工程地质学报. 2025(01): 240-257 .
    2. 段继超,宗琦,高朋飞,汪海波,吕闹,王浩. 干湿动载耦合作用下石灰岩宏细观复合损伤模型研究. 中国公路学报. 2025(03): 264-277 .
    3. 马家宝,毕靖. 单侧干湿循环下不同粒径砂岩孔隙结构和能量演化研究. 土工基础. 2024(03): 490-495 .
    4. 程家林,张贵科,邓韶辉,黄习文,周伟,马刚. 干湿循环对不同粒径堆石颗粒破碎强度的影响研究. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 95-105 .
    5. 李盛南,梁桥,刘新喜,张馨尤,肖俊,黄中华. 干湿循环作用下炭质泥岩溶蚀孔隙度的化学计量方法. 中国公路学报. 2023(02): 89-96 .
    6. 黄叶宁,邓华锋,李建林,冯云杰,王文东,齐豫. 水–岩作用下节理岩体剪切力学特性及本构模型. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(03): 545-557 .
    7. 张甘平,刘振宁,王鲁男,张洺溪. 酸性干湿循环作用下红砂岩物理力学性能劣化规律. 廊坊师范学院学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 70-74 .
    8. 龙登武,杨根兰,李达朗,刘镐. 干湿循环对赤水嘉定群厚层砂岩的损伤研究. 中国水运(下半月). 2023(03): 86-88 .
    9. 王维,王娟. 港航工程基槽开挖与港池疏浚施工问题探讨. 中国水运. 2023(06): 88-90 .
    10. 骆祚森,朱作祥,苏卿,李建林,邓华锋,杨超. 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究. 岩土力学. 2023(08): 2445-2457 .
    11. 杨圣奇,荆晓娇. 盐水干湿循环后砂岩物理力学特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(10): 2165-2171 . 本站查看
    12. 曾铃,邱健,匡波,肖源杰,刘杰,卞汉兵. 干湿循环作用下预崩解炭质泥岩强度特性及其劣化机制. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(09): 3635-3646 .
    13. 胡雷,张鹏,黄波林. 三峡库区典型岩溶岸坡危岩体失稳模式和长期稳定性分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2023(05): 64-73 .
    14. 赵凡,姚雪,谢振斌. 水岩作用对沈府君阙表层剥落影响机制分析. 西北大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 213-223 .
    15. 李盛南,刘新喜,李玉,王玮玮,周炎明. 炭质泥岩渐进破坏过程的变形特性及损伤演化研究. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 99-107 .
    16. 龙小爽,王杰,何平,郑红杰,陈康. 干湿循环对三峡库区岸坡砂岩力学特性的影响研究. 工程勘察. 2022(06): 38-43 .
    17. 杨烜宇,王闫超,孙志杰. 公路高陡边坡含软弱层灰岩的劣化特性研究. 公路. 2022(06): 316-324 .
    18. 张连吉,曾亚林,罗晓岚. 干湿循环作用下受荷炭质页岩损伤特性与能量特征研究. 公路工程. 2022(03): 166-171+185 .
    19. 王玮玮,刘新喜,李盛南,李玉. 干湿循环对炭质泥岩蠕变及损伤特性的影响. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(09): 173-181 .
    20. 穆成林,李华东,裴向军,王超,王睿. 溶蚀岩体各向异性力学性质的试验研究. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(05): 1070-1076+1112 .
    21. 罗小峰,侯运炳,闫浩东,孙翔. 干湿循环作用下全尾砂固结体的损伤机理. 中国有色金属学报. 2021(12): 3730-3739 .
    22. 霍树义,金坎辉,杨涛,周晴晴,张薇,崔建军. 干湿循环作用下砂岩蠕变损伤及本构模型. 土木工程与管理学报. 2020(02): 163-169 .
    23. 宋勇军,张磊涛,任建喜,陈佳星,车永新,杨慧敏,毕冉. 基于核磁共振技术的弱胶结砂岩干湿循环损伤特性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2019(04): 825-831 .
    24. 黄波林,殷跃平,张枝华,王健,秦臻,闫国强. 三峡工程库区岩溶岸坡消落带岩体劣化特征研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2019(09): 1786-1796 .
    25. 马登辉,姚华彦,崔强,程世磊. 水化学溶液对灰岩力学特性的影响分析. 中国科技论文. 2019(08): 846-851+861 .
    26. 何乐平,ZHONG Lin,胡启军,GU Yucheng,ZENG Junsen,TANG Wei. The Quantification of Micro-structural Damage of Weak Muddy Intercalation in Dry-wet Cycles Combining in-situ SEM and DIP. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Materials Science). 2019(06): 1396-1399 .

    Other cited types(44)

Catalog

    Article views (351) PDF downloads (300) Cited by(70)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return