• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHOU Jie, ZHU Kefan, LIU Chengjun, SHEN Panpan. Shear characteristics of steel pile-soft clay interface under cyclic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 49-53. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20038
Citation: ZHOU Jie, ZHU Kefan, LIU Chengjun, SHEN Panpan. Shear characteristics of steel pile-soft clay interface under cyclic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 49-53. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20038

Shear characteristics of steel pile-soft clay interface under cyclic loading

More Information
  • Received Date: June 20, 2024
  • Recently, construction of offshore wind power has developed rapidly in China. However, the current design methods for the bearing capacity of pile foundations are often based on small-diameter flexible piles, which are not applicable to the real situation. At the same time, there are thick layers of clay in the field. Therefore, it is necessary to study the shear characteristics of the steel pile-soft clay interface to optimize the design method. The large-scale interface shear test model corresponding to the laboratory tests is established by using the numerical simulation software, and the values of the micro-parameters are validated. The simulated results fit the laboratory test results well, and the model can accurately reflect the pile-clay interaction during shearing. Based on this model, the shear characteristics of the steel-clay interface under different cyclic loading frequencies and amplitudes are analyzed. The results show that while the interface strength slightly decreases with the increase of the frequency and amplitude of cyclic loading, particularly the effects of the amplitude are more obvious. The mechanical response of clay from the mesoscopic scale is also analyzed. The greater the cyclic loading frequency and amplitude, the smaller the horizontal displacement of the particles. The research results can provide support to predict the bearing capacity of pile foundation of offshore wind power.
  • [1]
    POTYONDY J G. Skin friction between various soils and construction materials[J]. Géotechnique, 1961, 11(4): 339-353. doi: 10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.339
    [2]
    夏红春, 周国庆. 土-结构接触面剪切力学特性及其影响因素试验[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2010, 39(6): 831-836.

    XIA Hongchun, ZHOU Guoqing. Experimental study of the shear mechanical characteristics at a soil-structure interface and the factors affecting them[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2010, 39(6): 831-836. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    冯大阔, 张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面静动力学特性的大型单剪试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(7): 1201-1208. http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/14627

    FENG Dakuo, ZHANG Jianmin. Large-scale simple shear tests on static and dynamic characteristics of interface between coarse-grained soil and structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(7): 1201-1208. (in Chinese http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/14627
    [4]
    朱俊高, 汪淼, 黄维, 等. 钢-土接触面位移与强度特性直剪试验[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(3): 265-271.

    ZHU Jungao, WANG Miao, HUANG Wei, et al. Experimental study on displacement and strength behavior of interface between soil and steel using direct shear test[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 49(3): 265-271. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    郭聚坤, 寇海磊, 许泓霖, 等. 桩-海洋黏土界面剪切性状试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(4): 104-108.

    GUO Jukun, KOU Hailei, XU Honglin, et al. Experimental study on shear behavior of pile-marine clay interface[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Academy of Sciences, 2019, 36(4): 104-108. (in Chinese
    [6]
    赵亦凡, 刘文白. 粗粒土与结构接触面往返剪切试验的PFC2D数值模拟[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2015, 36(1): 81-85.

    ZHAO Yifan, LIU Wenbai. Numerical simulation on cyclic shear test of graval-structure interface by PFC2D[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2015, 36(1): 81-85. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    王超. 抗滑桩与土微观相互作用机理的研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.

    WANG Chao. Study on the Microscopic Interaction Mechanism between Anti-Slide Pile and Soil[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    王志杰, 杨广庆, 王贺, 等. 刚性与柔性顶部边界下筋土界面特性的细观数值研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(5): 967-973. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201905021

    WANG Zhijie, YANG Guangqing, WANG He, et al. Mesoscopic numerical study on the interface characteristics of reinforced soil under rigid and flexible top boundary[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 967-973. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201905021
    [9]
    王瑞, 郭聚坤, 雷胜友, 等. 混凝土-海洋黏土界面剪切试验与数值模拟[J]. 中国科技论文, 2022, 17(12): 1363-1368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2022.12.010

    WANG Rui, GUO Jukun, LEI Shengyou, et al. Shear test and numerical simulation of concrete marine clay interface[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2022, 17(12): 1363-1368. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2022.12.010
    [10]
    ZHOU J, LIU C, ZHU K, et al. Macroscopic behaviour and mesoscopic mechanism of shear strength characteristics of pile-soil interface under cyclic loading[J/OL]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 297: 116998. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.116998.
    [11]
    孙其诚, 辛海丽, 刘建国, 等. 颗粒体系中的骨架及力链网络[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(增刊1): 83-87.

    SUN Qicheng, XIN Haili, LIU Jianguo, et al. Skeleton and force chain network in static granular material[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(S1): 83-87. (in Chinese)
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 许博闻,兰恒星,刘世杰. 界面形态对黄土-泥岩接触面剪切力学特性影响研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(02): 448-462 .
    2. 黄晓虎,魏兆亨,易武,郭飞,黄海峰,肖宇煌. 裂隙优势流入渗诱发堆积层滑坡浅层破坏机理研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(06): 1136-1145 . 本站查看
    3. 赵宽耀,许强,陈婉琳,彭大雷,高登辉. 黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究. 岩土力学. 2024(09): 2754-2764 .
    4. 王立朝,任三绍,李金秋. 降雨作用下古滑坡复活机理物理模拟试验研究. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(05): 21-31 .
    5. 王诏楷. 地下水人工回灌颗粒沉积研究进展. 江淮水利科技. 2023(01): 9-14 .
    6. 周峙,罗易,张家铭,孙狂飙. 考虑裂隙面积率的裂隙性黏土优势流双域入渗规律研究. 安全与环境工程. 2023(02): 109-118 .
    7. 吴玮江,宋丙辉,刘迪,安亚鹏. 黄土塬区包气带水分运移特征研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(03): 12-22 .
    8. 曾鹏,王宇豪,张天龙,张琳,南骁聪. 基于NSGA-Ⅱ遗传算法的黄土滑坡参数反分析与稳定性预测. 地球科学. 2023(05): 1675-1685 .
    9. 冯乐涛,吴玮江,刘兴荣,宿星,万朝东. 黄土高原降水入渗方式与引发滑坡研究——以甘肃黄土地区为例. 科学技术与工程. 2023(14): 5937-5945 .
    10. 许增光,李海洋,柴军瑞,曹成,陈东来. 堤坝内集中渗漏通道与周围介质水量交换研究. 水力发电学报. 2023(07): 12-23 .
    11. 赵宽耀,许强,高登辉,刘方洲,彭大雷,陈婉琳. 坡底饱和型黄土滑坡离心模拟试验. 岩土力学. 2023(11): 3213-3223 .
    12. 赵鲁庆,彭建兵,马鹏辉,冷艳秋,朱兴华. 黄土细观界面及其灾害效应研究初探. 工程地质学报. 2023(06): 1783-1798 .
    13. 许强,陈婉琳,蒲川豪,袁爽,刘佳良. 基于自然的解决方案在黄土高原重大工程灾变防控中的理论与实践. 工程地质学报. 2022(04): 1179-1192 .
    14. 宁瑞浩,冷艳秋,何芝远,李泽坤,马哲. 基于CT的黄土孔隙尺度优先流特性. 科学技术与工程. 2022(23): 9927-9936 .
    15. 蒋小虎,黄跃廷,胡海军,陈铄,陈锐,王崇华,汪慧,康顺祥. 基于原位双环、试坑浸水试验和数值模拟反演的Q_3黄土饱和渗透系数对比研究. 岩土力学. 2022(11): 2941-2951 .
    16. 李同录,汪颖,胡向阳,李萍,王宇. 厚层非饱和黄土中优势流和活塞流的讨论. 工程地质学报. 2022(06): 1842-1848 .
    17. 张永双,吴瑞安,任三绍. 降雨优势入渗通道对古滑坡复活的影响. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(04): 777-789 .
    18. 孙恒飞,朱兴华,成玉祥,张智锋,张卜平,蔡佳乐. 黄土优势渗流研究进展与展望. 自然灾害学报. 2021(06): 1-12 .
    19. 侯孝东,涂国祥,邱潇,李明,王清,钱昭宇. 汉源九襄地区深厚砾石层渗透特性研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2020(04): 192-197 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Article views (112) PDF downloads (37) Cited by(41)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return