Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 46 Issue 1
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Supplements
YU Haitao, WANG Zhikun. Efficient hybrid simulation method for seismic response analysis of underground structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 45-53. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221240
Citation: YU Haitao, WANG Zhikun. Efficient hybrid simulation method for seismic response analysis of underground structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(1): 45-53. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221240
shu

Efficient hybrid simulation method for seismic response analysis of underground structures

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

  • 2.

    Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

More Information
  • Received Date: October 09, 2022
  • Available Online: January 08, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The numerical simulation is critical for the seismic analysis of underground structures. However, its accuracy and efficiency are affected by the factors such as input of ground motion, boundary effect, model scale, which leads to the incompatibility among computational scale, time and accuracy. How to efficiently and accurately simulate the seismic response of the underground structure-ground interaction system is still an open question. A novel hybrid boundary element-finite element method in the framework of the domain reduction method (DRM) is proposed to efficiently simulate the seismic response characteristics of the subsurface structure-strata system. First, the overall subsurface structure-stratum model is divided into the inner domain sub-model of the near-field stratum structure and the outer domain sub-model of the far-field stratum, in which the displacement continuity at the inner-outer domain coupling boundary is ensured by overlapping nodes. Second, the non-free field vibration characteristics under the influences of free field and topography in the outer domain are solved by the boundary element method, and the dynamic response in the outer domain is converted into the equivalent seismic load by the DRM. The method greatly reduces the size of the outer domain, ensures the reasonable input of ground vibration, and realizes the rapid parametric analysis of the seismic response of subsurface structures in the inner domain. Further, two typical cases are designed to test the reliability and efficiency of the method. In the case of a two-line tunnel without the influences of topography, the accuracy of the method is validated by comparison with the reference solution. In another case of a two-line tunnel under the influences of terrain conditions, the numerical results show that compared with that of the remote boundary method and the traditional viscoelastic method, the computational cost is reduced by about 72% and 58%, respectively, and the computational scale is reduced by about 97% and 83%, respectively. In addition, the proposed method can be extended to the dynamic response analysis of subsurface structures under the action of oblique incident ground shaking.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (20)
  • [1]
    TSINIDIS G, DE SILVA F, ANASTASOPOULOS I, et al. Seismic behaviour of tunnels: from experiments to analysis[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 99: 103334. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103334
    [2]
    王国波, 彭祥军, 郝朋飞, 等. 近距离地下穿越结构地震响应研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(11): 2026-2036. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201911007

    WANG Guobo, PENG Xiangjun, HAO Pengfei, et al. Review of researches on seismic response of close underground crossing structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(11): 2026-2036. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201911007
    [3]
    刘晶波, 宝鑫, 谭辉, 等. 土-结构动力相互作用分析中基于内部子结构的地震波动输入方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(8): 87-96.

    LIU Jingbo, BAO Xin, TAN Hui, et al. Seismic wave input method for soil-structure dynamic interaction analysis based on internal substructure[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(8): 87-96. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    金丹丹, 陈国兴, 董菲蕃. 多地貌单元复合场地非线性地震效应特征二维分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(6): 1818-1825.

    JIN Dandan, CHEN Guoxing, DONG Feifan. 2D analysis of nonlinear seismic effect characteristics of multi-geomorphic composite site[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(6): 1818-1825. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    刘晶波, 谷音, 杜义欣. 一致黏弹性人工边界及黏弹性边界单元[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(9): 1070-1075. http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/12156

    LIU Jingbo, GU Yin, DU Yixin. Consistent viscous-spring artificial boundaries and viscous-spring boundary elements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(9): 1070-1075. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/id/12156
    [6]
    谭辉. 土-结构动力相互作用分析中地震波输入方法研究及应用[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2018.

    TAN Hui. Research and Application of the Seismic Wave Input Method for Soil-Structure Dynamic Interaction Analysis[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    赵密, 李旭东, 高志懂, 等. 地震作用下土-深埋地下结构相互作用的高效时程分析方法[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2021, 41(1): 39-45, 54.

    ZHAO Mi, LI Xudong, GAO Zhidong, et al. Efficient analysis for seismic soil-structure interaction with deep burial depth[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2021, 41(1): 39-45, 54. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    BIELAK J. Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, part Ⅰ: theory[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2003, 93(2): 817-824. doi: 10.1785/0120010251
    [9]
    WANG H X, YANG H, FENG Y, et al. Modeling and simulation of earthquake soil structure interaction excited by inclined seismic waves[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 146: 106720. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106720
    [10]
    ZHANG L, ZHANG J H. Local wavefield refinement using Fourier interpolation and boundary extrapolation for finite-element method based on domain reduction method[J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87(3): T251-T263. doi: 10.1190/geo2021-0503.1
    [11]
    KONTOE S, ZDRAVKOVIC L, POTTS D M. An assessment of the domain reduction method as an advanced boundary condition and some pitfalls in the use of conventional absorbing boundaries[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2009, 33(3): 309-330. doi: 10.1002/nag.713
    [12]
    胡丹, 李芬, 张开银. 饱和土-结构动力相互作用分析中地震动输入方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(增刊2): 58-62. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2012

    HU Dan, LI Fen, ZHANG Kaiyin. Wave input method for saturated soil-structure dynamic interaction analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 58-62. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2018S2012
    [13]
    刘中宪, 刘英, 孟思博, 等. 基于间接边界元法的近断层沉积谷地地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1141-1155, 1169.

    LIU Zhongxian, LIU Ying, MENG Sibo, et al. Near-fault ground motion simulation of alluvial valley based on indirect boundary element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1141-1155, 1169. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    ALIELAHI H, KAMALIAN M, ADAMPIRA M. Seismic ground amplification by unlined tunnels subjected to vertically propagating SV and P waves using BEM[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 71: 63-79. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.007
    [15]
    朱俊, 梁建文. 基于FE-IBE耦合方法的地铁车站抗震分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2018, 38(4): 111-116.

    ZHU Jun, LIANG Jianwen. Seismic analysis of subway station by a FE-IBE coupling method[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2018, 38(4): 111-116. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    VASILEV G, PARVANOVA S, DINEVA P, et al. Soil-structure interaction using BEM-FEM coupling through ANSYS software package[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 70: 104-117. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.007
    [17]
    SOARES D, GODINHO L. An overview of recent advances in the iterative analysis of coupled models for wave propagation[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 2014: 1-21.
    [18]
    LUCO J E, DE BARROS F C P. Dynamic displacements and stresses in the vicinity of a cylindrical cavity embedded in a half-space[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1994, 23(3): 321-340.
    [19]
    WONG H L. Diffraction of P, SV, and Rayleigh waves by surface topography[D]. California: University of California, 1979.
    [20]
    RICKER N. The form and laws of propagation of seismic wavelets[J]. Geophysics, 1953, 18(1): 10-40. doi: 10.1190/1.1437843
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (1)

  • Other Related Supplements

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 许博闻，兰恒星，刘世杰. 界面形态对黄土-泥岩接触面剪切力学特性影响研究. 工程地质学报. 2024(02): 448-462 .
    2. 黄晓虎，魏兆亨，易武，郭飞，黄海峰，肖宇煌. 裂隙优势流入渗诱发堆积层滑坡浅层破坏机理研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(06): 1136-1145 . 本站查看
    3. 赵宽耀，许强，陈婉琳，彭大雷，高登辉. 黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究. 岩土力学. 2024(09): 2754-2764 .
    4. 王立朝，任三绍，李金秋. 降雨作用下古滑坡复活机理物理模拟试验研究. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(05): 21-31 .
    5. 王诏楷. 地下水人工回灌颗粒沉积研究进展. 江淮水利科技. 2023(01): 9-14 .
    6. 周峙，罗易，张家铭，孙狂飙. 考虑裂隙面积率的裂隙性黏土优势流双域入渗规律研究. 安全与环境工程. 2023(02): 109-118 .
    7. 吴玮江，宋丙辉，刘迪，安亚鹏. 黄土塬区包气带水分运移特征研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(03): 12-22 .
    8. 曾鹏，王宇豪，张天龙，张琳，南骁聪. 基于NSGA-Ⅱ遗传算法的黄土滑坡参数反分析与稳定性预测. 地球科学. 2023(05): 1675-1685 .
    9. 冯乐涛，吴玮江，刘兴荣，宿星，万朝东. 黄土高原降水入渗方式与引发滑坡研究——以甘肃黄土地区为例. 科学技术与工程. 2023(14): 5937-5945 .
    10. 许增光，李海洋，柴军瑞，曹成，陈东来. 堤坝内集中渗漏通道与周围介质水量交换研究. 水力发电学报. 2023(07): 12-23 .
    11. 赵宽耀，许强，高登辉，刘方洲，彭大雷，陈婉琳. 坡底饱和型黄土滑坡离心模拟试验. 岩土力学. 2023(11): 3213-3223 .
    12. 赵鲁庆，彭建兵，马鹏辉，冷艳秋，朱兴华. 黄土细观界面及其灾害效应研究初探. 工程地质学报. 2023(06): 1783-1798 .
    13. 许强，陈婉琳，蒲川豪，袁爽，刘佳良. 基于自然的解决方案在黄土高原重大工程灾变防控中的理论与实践. 工程地质学报. 2022(04): 1179-1192 .
    14. 宁瑞浩，冷艳秋，何芝远，李泽坤，马哲. 基于CT的黄土孔隙尺度优先流特性. 科学技术与工程. 2022(23): 9927-9936 .
    15. 蒋小虎，黄跃廷，胡海军，陈铄，陈锐，王崇华，汪慧，康顺祥. 基于原位双环、试坑浸水试验和数值模拟反演的Q_3黄土饱和渗透系数对比研究. 岩土力学. 2022(11): 2941-2951 .
    16. 李同录，汪颖，胡向阳，李萍，王宇. 厚层非饱和黄土中优势流和活塞流的讨论. 工程地质学报. 2022(06): 1842-1848 .
    17. 张永双，吴瑞安，任三绍. 降雨优势入渗通道对古滑坡复活的影响. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(04): 777-789 .
    18. 孙恒飞，朱兴华，成玉祥，张智锋，张卜平，蔡佳乐. 黄土优势渗流研究进展与展望. 自然灾害学报. 2021(06): 1-12 .
    19. 侯孝东，涂国祥，邱潇，李明，王清，钱昭宇. 汉源九襄地区深厚砾石层渗透特性研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2020(04): 192-197 .

    Other cited types(22)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(41)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return