• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
WANG Gang, XIAO Zhi-yong, WANG Chang-sheng, JIANG Yu-jing, YU Jun-hong. Gas transport in coal seams based on non-equilibrium state[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(8): 1512-1520. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202208016
Citation: WANG Gang, XIAO Zhi-yong, WANG Chang-sheng, JIANG Yu-jing, YU Jun-hong. Gas transport in coal seams based on non-equilibrium state[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(8): 1512-1520. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202208016

Gas transport in coal seams based on non-equilibrium state

More Information
  • Received Date: August 02, 2021
  • Available Online: September 22, 2022
  • During extraction of coalbed methane, the reservoir will be in a non-equilibrium dynamic adjustment phase for a long period of time due to the high variability of fracture and matrix permeability properties. However, most of the current tests and permeability models only consider the effects of a certain fixed gas pressure, which greatly limits the study of reservoir gas flow under non-equilibrium condition. Therefore, based on the concept that the reservoir is a dual porous medium, and considering the effects of different pore pressures, desorption deformation and mechanical effects of matrix-fracture on the evolution of fracture aperture during the extraction process, a model is proposed to predict the reservoir permeability under variable stress states and validated through the field data. Then the model is substituted into the gas flow equation, and the pore pressure of matrix–fracture and the evolution of core permeability in time and space are studied separately by using the finite element software. The results show that during the core desorption: (1) The fracture gas pressure in the core is disturbed to a greater extent than the matrix gas pressure. (2) The gas pressure and permeability of matrix–fracture exhibit non-linear distribution along the core length. (3) The permeability of matrix–fracture varies in the same trend.
  • [1]
    刘文华. 能源总量供需平稳能源结构继续优化[N]. 中国信息报, 2020-1-20.

    LIU Wen-hua. Total energy supply and demand will remain stable and the energy mix will continue to improve[N]. China Information News, 2020-1-20. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    JIANG C Z, ZHAO Z F, ZHANG X W, et al. Controlling effects of differential swelling index on evolution of coal permeability[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 12(3): 461–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.02.001
    [3]
    肖智勇, 王长盛, 王刚, 等. 基质–裂隙相互作用对渗透率演化的影响: 考虑基质变形和应力修正[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(12): 2209–2219. http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/abstract/abstract18907.shtml

    XIAO Zhi-yong, WANG Chang-sheng, WANG Gang, et al. Influences of matrix-fracture interaction on permeability evolution: considering matrix deformation and stress correction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(12): 2209–2219. (in Chinese) http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/abstract/abstract18907.shtml
    [4]
    LIU J S, CHEN Z W, ELSWORTH D, et al. Interactions of multiple processes during CBM extraction: a critical review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 87(3/4): 175–189.
    [5]
    WU Y, LIU J S, ELSWORTH D, et al. Dual poroelastic response of a coal seam to CO2 injection[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(4): 668–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.02.004
    [6]
    LIU H H, RUTQVIST J. A new coal-permeability model: internal swelling stress and fracture–matrix interaction[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2010, 82(1): 157–171. doi: 10.1007/s11242-009-9442-x
    [7]
    李小春, 付旭, 方志明, 等. 有效应力对煤吸附特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(5): 1247–1252. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201305003.htm

    LI Xiao-chun, FU Xu, FANG Zhi-ming, et al. Experimental study of influence of effective stress on coal adsorption performance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(5): 1247–1252. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201305003.htm
    [8]
    ZHOU Y B, LI Z H, YANG Y L, et al. Evolution of coal permeability with cleat deformation and variable klinkenberg effect[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2016, 115(1): 153–167. doi: 10.1007/s11242-016-0759-y
    [9]
    LIU T, LIN B Q, YANG W. Impact of matrix-fracture interactions on coal permeability: model development and analysis[J]. Fuel, 2017, 207: 522–532. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.125
    [10]
    WANG L S, CHEN Z W, WANG C G, et al. Reassessment of coal permeability evolution using steady-state flow methods: the role of flow regime transition[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2019, 211: 103210. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103210
    [11]
    ZHI S, ELSWORTH D. The role of gas desorption on gas outbursts in underground mining of coal[J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2016, 2(3): 151–171. doi: 10.1007/s40948-016-0026-2
    [12]
    ZHANG H B, LIU J S, ELSWORTH D. How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: a new FE model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(8): 1226–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.11.007
    [13]
    SHI J Q, DURUCAN S. Drawdown induced changes in permeability of coalbeds: a new interpretation of the reservoir response to primary recovery[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2004, 56(1): 1–16. doi: 10.1023/B:TIPM.0000018398.19928.5a
    [14]
    LIU Q Q, CHENG Y P, ZHOU H X, et al. A mathematical model of coupled gas flow and coal deformation with gas diffusion and klinkenberg effects[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(3): 1163–1180. doi: 10.1007/s00603-014-0594-9
    [15]
    PENG Y, LIU J S, WEI M Y, et al. Why coal permeability changes under free swellings: new insights[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 133: 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.08.011
    [16]
    张宏学. 页岩储层渗流–应力耦合模型及应用[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015.

    ZHANG Hong-xue. Seepage and Stress Coupling Model for Shale Reservoir and Its Application[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    GRAY I. Reservoir engineering in coal seams: part 1—the physical process of gas storage and movement in coal seams[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1987, 2(1): 28–34. doi: 10.2118/12514-PA
    [18]
    PALMER I, MANSOORI J. How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1998, 1(6): 539–544.
    [19]
    CUI X J, BUSTIN R M. Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(9): 1181–1202. doi: 10.1306/05110504114
    [20]
    SHI J Q, DURUCAN S. Exponential growth in San Juan Basin fruitland coalbed permeability with reservoir drawdown: model match and new insights[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2010, 13(6): 914–925.
    [21]
    WU Y, LIU J S, ELSWORTH D, et al. Evolution of coal permeability: contribution of heterogeneous swelling processes[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 88(2/3): 152-162.
    [22]
    ROBERTSON E P. Modeling permeability in coal using sorption-induced strain data[C]// SPE Annual Tethnical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, 2005.
    [23]
    PALMER I. Permeability changes in coal: analytical modeling[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2009, 77(1/2): 119–126.
    [24]
    WU Y, LIU J S, ELSWORTH D, et al. Development of anisotropic permeability during coalbed methane production[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2010, 2(4): 197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2010.06.002
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 赵文杰,赵洪宝,荆士杰. 深部储层岩石渗流的滑脱效应研究——以煤和砂岩为例. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(09): 2189-2200 .
    2. 肖智勇,王刚,刘杰,邓华锋,姜枫,郑程程. 热–流–固耦合作用下含水煤层渗透率模型建立及应用研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(12): 3044-3057 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (223) PDF downloads (36) Cited by(4)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return