• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
CHEN Guo-xing, LIU Xue-ning, ZHU Jiao, JIN Dan-dan, XU Han-gang. Spatial variation of predominant periods of site and amplifications of peak ground accelerations for deep sediment layers: case study of Suzhou City[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(6): 996-1004. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201906002
Citation: CHEN Guo-xing, LIU Xue-ning, ZHU Jiao, JIN Dan-dan, XU Han-gang. Spatial variation of predominant periods of site and amplifications of peak ground accelerations for deep sediment layers: case study of Suzhou City[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(6): 996-1004. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201906002

Spatial variation of predominant periods of site and amplifications of peak ground accelerations for deep sediment layers: case study of Suzhou City

More Information
  • Received Date: March 18, 2018
  • Published Date: June 24, 2019
  • Based on the regional tectonic environment, the urban region of Suzhou City may be subjected to the effects of near-field mid-strong earthquakes, middle-field strong earthquakes and far-field large earthquakes. According to the cyclic triaxial test results of 111 undisturbed soil samples from a 250 m-deep borehole, the modified Matasovic model can be used to well characterize the tendency of reduction of shear modulus and increase of damping ratio. Based on the 393 sets of borehole shear wave velocity data, and by identifying the weathered rock layer with shear-wave velocity larger than 700 m/s as the seismic bedrock, the nonlinear 1D site response analysis is performed using a discretized lumped mass model. A method for evaluating the site predominant period using the weak motion records is proposed. The spatial variation of the predominant periods and the amplifications of peak ground accelerations (PGAs) in the urban region of Suzhou City are given: (1) Using the seismograms during the near-field mid-strong earthquakes, the middle-field strong earthquakes and the far-field large earthquakes as the bedrock motions, the contour maps of the predominant periods of site are quite similar, but the spatial variation of the amplification of PGAs is closely related to the characteristics of bedrock motions. (2) The PGAs are mainly related to bedrock motion intensities less than 0.10g, otherwise, the effects of frequency characteristics of bedrock motions on the PGA amplifications are significant.
  • [1]
    SEED H B, IDRISS I M, DZEFULIAN H.Relationships between soil conditions and building damage in the Caracas Earthquake of July 29, 1967[R]. California: College of Engineering University of California, Berkeley,1970.
    [2]
    CASTRO R R, PÉREZ-CAMPOS X, HUSKER A, et al. A review on advances in seismology in Mexico after 30 years from the 1985 earthquake[J]. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2016, 70: 49-54.
    [3]
    SINGH S K, MENA E, CASTRO R R.Some aspects of source characteristics of the 19 September 1985 Michoacán earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78(2): 451-477.
    [4]
    CAMPILLO M, GARIEL J C, AKI K, et al.Destructive strong ground motion in Mexico City: source, path, and site effects during great 1985 Michoacán earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1989, 79(6): 1718-1735.
    [5]
    HASHASH Y M A, PARK D. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 62(1): 185-206.
    [6]
    陈国兴, 战吉艳, 刘建达, 等. 远场大地震作用下深软场地设计地震动参数研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(9): 1591-1599.
    (CHEN Guo-xing, ZHAN Ji-yan, LIU Jian-da, et al.Parameter study on ground motion design of deep soft site under far-field large earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1591-1599. (in Chinese))
    [7]
    CHEN G X, ZHU J, QIANG M Y, et al.Three-dimensional site characterization with borehole data-a case study of Suzhou area[J]. Engineering Geology, 2018, 234: 65-82.
    [8]
    朱姣, 陈国兴, 许汉刚, 等. 苏州第四纪深厚地层剪切波速空间变化特征及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(11): 726-735.
    (ZHU Jiao, CHEN Guo-xing, XU Han-gang, et al.Spatial variation characteristics of shear wave velocity structure and its application for quaternary deep sediment layers in Suzhou region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 726-735. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    朱姣, 陈国兴, 许汉刚. 地震基岩面的选取对深厚场地地表地震动参数的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(11): 2079-2087.
    (ZHU Jiao, CHEN Guo-xing, XU Han-gang.Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(11): 2079-2087. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    陈国兴, 卜屹凡, 周正龙, 等. 沉积相和深度对第四纪土动剪切模量和阻尼比的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(7): 1344-1350.
    (CHEN Guo-xing, BU Yi-fan, ZHOU Zheng-long, et al.Influence of sedimentary facies and depth on normalized dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of quaternary soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1344-1350. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    卜屹凡. 深厚地层土动模量和阻尼比的测试方法与试验研究[D]. 南京: 南京工业大学, 2016.
    (BU Yi-fan.Dynamic modulus and damping ratio test method and experimental study on deep sediment layers[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Tech University, 2016. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    中国地震台网中心. 中国及邻区地震震中分布图[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2015.
    (China Earthquake Networks Center. Map of earthquake epicenter in China and adjacent areas[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    SEED H B, IDRISS I M.Characteristics of rock motions during earthquakes[J]. Soil Mech Found Div, 1969, 95(5): 1199-1218.
    [14]
    RATHJE E M, ABRAHAMSON N A, BRAY J D.Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(2): 150-159.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 那仁满都拉,格根塔娜,于欣冉,宝音图,郭恩亮,韩晓明,杨永胜. 基于常时微动观测的城市建筑物共振效应评价及地震安全韧性提升研究. 灾害学. 2023(03): 68-74 .
    2. 程艺,庄海洋,李兆焱,吴琪. 基于2种不同判别方法的深厚软弱场地液化对比研究. 自然灾害学报. 2023(05): 100-107 .
    3. 齐文浩,陈方晓,李林芳,张苋凯. 地震动随机性对地表加速度峰值的影响及机理研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(S2): 7-12 . 本站查看
    4. 梁师俊,蒋蓓. 水平土层地震响应地面峰值加速度可靠度研究. 振动与冲击. 2022(06): 30-36+85 .
    5. 徐建元,李平. 不同场地分类方法对比分析. 建筑结构. 2022(S1): 878-884 .
    6. 王竞,王世元,宴金旭,冯薪,赵晶. 中外场地分类研究现状及其应用讨论. 世界地震工程. 2022(03): 236-245 .
    7. 邱明兵,高文生,秋仁东. 考虑惯性和运动相互作用桩基础抗震计算实例. 建筑科学. 2021(03): 39-45 .
    8. 陈国兴,丁杰发,方怡,彭艳菊,李小军. 场地类别分类方案研究. 岩土力学. 2020(11): 3509-3522+3582 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (341) PDF downloads (177) Cited by(12)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return