高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
谢力子. CASE法的实质及承载力低估的原因探析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(1): 49-54.
引用本文: 谢力子. CASE法的实质及承载力低估的原因探析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(1): 49-54.
shu
Xie Lizi. An analysis on the nature of CASE method and on the cause of underestimated pile load capacity by this method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(1): 49-54.
Citation: Xie Lizi. An analysis on the nature of CASE method and on the cause of underestimated pile load capacity by this method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(1): 49-54.
shu

CASE法的实质及承载力低估的原因探析

An analysis on the nature of CASE method and on the cause of underestimated pile load capacity by this method

    摘要
  • 摘要: ＣＡＳＥ法自称是波动方程的闭合解，但由该法确定的单桩极限承载力要比静载试验结果偏低很多。本文依据波动理论，对该方法的假设是否合理，公式能否成立，承载力低估的原因，以及该方法如何加以改进等问题，进行了探析。

     

    Abstract: CASE method was claimed by its inventor as a closed form solution of the wave equation.However,the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles predicted by CASE method was much lower than that determined by static load test.The rationality of the assumption of CASE method ,the possibility of the establishment of its formulas,the causes of underestimating the bearing capacity, as well as the way to improve the method are analysed and suggested according to the wave theory in this paper.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(0)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回