• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
王道远, 刘佳, 张逴, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘辉, 崔光耀. 高地应力深埋隧道断裂破碎带大变形控制方法现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(4): 658-666. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202004008
引用本文: 王道远, 刘佳, 张逴, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘辉, 崔光耀. 高地应力深埋隧道断裂破碎带大变形控制方法现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(4): 658-666. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202004008
WANG Dao-yuan, LIU Jia, ZHANG Chuo, YUAN Jin-xiu, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Hui, CUI Guang-yao. Field tests on large deformation control method for surrounding rock of deep tunnel in fault zone with high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 658-666. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202004008
Citation: WANG Dao-yuan, LIU Jia, ZHANG Chuo, YUAN Jin-xiu, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Hui, CUI Guang-yao. Field tests on large deformation control method for surrounding rock of deep tunnel in fault zone with high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(4): 658-666. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202004008

高地应力深埋隧道断裂破碎带大变形控制方法现场试验研究

Field tests on large deformation control method for surrounding rock of deep tunnel in fault zone with high geostress

  • 摘要: 针对新莲隧道大埋深、高地应力、大变形凸显的实际情况,开展单层支护、双层支护、刚性强支、超前导洞+扩挖方案下支护受力及变形控制方法现场试验研究。结果表明:①原设计方案1支护偏弱不足以抵抗围岩形变压力,平导支护应力超过设计应力值率达100%,正洞支护侵限严重,换拱率100%;②“让抗结合”的双层支护方案2,下台阶与仰拱同步施作,不利于下部围岩应力释放,仰拱隆起开裂,边墙换拱率84%;变更下台阶与仰拱分段施作后,仰拱应力缓慢释放,大变形得以控制;③采用“刚性强支”理念的方案3,增设了“H175型钢+大拱脚靴套+锁脚锚杆套管”,提升了拱架整体刚度,最大收敛变形速率减小42.4%、月开挖进尺达90 m;④采取“超前导洞+扩挖”的方案4,实现了应力分阶段缓释,大变形得到有效控制,但纤维混凝土的应用及超前导洞支护的拆除增加了成本和工序。建议跨断裂破碎带段采用经济合理、工序简便、支护调整灵活的方案3进行施工,方案4可作为更大围岩变形的预备方案。同时拱顶预留变形量可近似按边墙预留变形量的1/2留设。

     

    Abstract: In view of the actual situation of large buried depth, high crustal stress and large deformation of Xinlian tunnel, field tests on support force and deformation control methods are carried out with single-layer support, double-layer support, rigid strong support, advanced pilot tunnel + expansion scheme. The results show that: (1) The original design scheme No.1 is not strong enough to resist the deformation pressure of surrounding rock. The stress ratio of flat guide support exceeds the design stress value by 100%, the invading limit of support is serious, and the arch replacement rate is 100%. (2) The double-layer support scheme No.2 of combining resistance with resistance is adopted. The synchronous operation of lower bench and inverted arch simplifies the operation sequence, but it is not conducive to stress release. The inverted arch is uplift crack and the rate of changing arch of side wall is 84%. When the lower bench and the inverted arch are sectioned and operated, the stress in the inverted arch is slowly released, and the large deformation is controlled. (3) Scheme No. 3 of rigid strong support by 'H175 steel+large arch boot sleeve+lock foot anchor sleeve’ is adopted, the overall rigidity of the arch is improved, the maximum convergence deformation rate is reduced by 42.4%, and the excavation per month can reach more than 90 m. (4) Scheme No. 4 of 'leading tunnel + enlarging excavation’ is adopted to realize the stress release by stages, and the large deformation is effectively controlled. However, the application of fiber-reinforced concrete and the demolition of leading tunnel support increase the cost and process. Scheme No.3 is recommended of for its economical rationality, simple construction procedure, and flexible support adjustment. Scheme No.4 can be as a preparation scheme for larger deformation of surrounding rock. At the same time, the reserved deformation of vault can be approximately 1/2 of the reserved deformation of side wall.

     

/

返回文章
返回