• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

竖井地基固结二维等效分析方法考评

邓岳保, 刘干斌, 陶海冰, 谢康和

邓岳保, 刘干斌, 陶海冰, 谢康和. 竖井地基固结二维等效分析方法考评[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(zk2): 601-606.
引用本文: 邓岳保, 刘干斌, 陶海冰, 谢康和. 竖井地基固结二维等效分析方法考评[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(zk2): 601-606.
DENG Yue-bao, LIU Gan-bin, TAO Hai-bin, XIE Kang-he. Evaluation of two-dimensional equivalent method for finite element analysis of consolidation by vertical drains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 601-606.
Citation: DENG Yue-bao, LIU Gan-bin, TAO Hai-bin, XIE Kang-he. Evaluation of two-dimensional equivalent method for finite element analysis of consolidation by vertical drains[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 601-606.

竖井地基固结二维等效分析方法考评  English Version

详细信息
    作者简介:

    邓岳保(1983- ),男,湖南岳阳人,博士,讲师,主要从事软黏土地基处理、岩土工程数值分析等方面的研究与教学工作。E-mail: dengyuebao@nbu.edu.cn。

  • 中图分类号: TU43

Evaluation of two-dimensional equivalent method for finite element analysis of consolidation by vertical drains

  • 摘要: 平面应变二维等效分析方法是竖井地基固结有限元分析的主要方法之一。介绍了该法的基本原理,列举了六种具体的二维等效转换公式。然后,以成层土竖井地基算例和未打穿竖井地基算例,分别对不同转换方法的可靠性进行了考评。结果发现:地基土成层性对二维等效方法计算结果的可靠性有较显著影响,而竖井未打穿情况的影响不明显;在本文算例参数取值情况下,各种方法的误差情况差别较大,其最大误差达35%;Chai方法和Tran方法得到的固结度计算结果相对可靠,其最大误差在10%以内。另外还发现,Chai方法考虑的因素较全面,操作过程不受人为因素影响,其计算结果相对可靠且计算效率显著提高,因此值得推广。
    Abstract: The two-dimensional equivalent method is one of the main approaches for the finite element analysis of consolidation by vertical drains. Summaries and comments about the equivalent methods are firstly carried out based on the existing researches. Then, six equivalent methods, which are widely applied in present, are examined through two numerical examples. The first one is the layered soft soil foundation and the other is the partially penetrated vertical drained foundation. The estimated results show that the parameter values for the layered soil example have significant impact on the reliability of the equivalent methods, while the length of the drain has no significant effect. For the parameter values applied in the examples, errors for the degree of consolidation for different methods vary considerably. The biggest errors reach 35% for different methods. Relatively, the calculated results of Chai's (2001) method and Tran's (2008) method are reliable and the largest errors of the two methods are within 10%. Besides, Chai's equivalent method is worth promoting since the operation of the method is rigorous and has high computational efficient.
  • [1] 谢康和, 周 健. 岩土工程有限元分析理论与应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002. (XIE Kang-he, ZHOU Jian. Theory and application of the finite element method in geotechnical engineering[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    [2] INDRARATNA B. Recent advances in the application of vertical drains and vacuum preloading in soft soil stabilitisation[R]. Australian Geomechanics Society: 2010 EH Davis Memorial Lecture, 2010.
    [3] 王旭升, 陈崇希. 砂井地基固结的三维有限元模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(1): 94-98. (WANG Xu-sheng, CHEN Chong-xi. 3D finite element modeling of consolidation for sand drained foundations and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(1): 94-98. (in Chinese))
    [4] 陈根媛. 多层地基的一维固结计算方法与砂井地基计算的改进建议[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1984(2): 18-30. (CHEN Gen-yuan. One-dimensional consolidation of layered systems and a suggestion for improving calculation of sand-drained subsoil[J]. Hydro-science and Engineering, 1984(2): 18-30. (in Chinese))
    [5] HIRD C C, PYRAH I C, RUSSELL D. Finite element modeling of vertical drains beneath embankments on soft ground[J]. Géotechnique, 1992, 42(3): 499-511.
    [6] INDRARATNA B, REDANA IW . Plane strain modeling of smear effects associated with vertical drains[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE, 1997, 123(5): 474-478.
    [7] 陈建峰, 石振明, 陈竹昌. 砂井地基平面问题转换及其应用[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2001(1): 23-26. (CHEN Jian-feng, SHI Zhen-ming, CHEN Zhu-chang. Transformation of axisymmetric vertical drains into plain vertical drains and its applications[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2001(1): 23-26. (in Chinese))
    [8] 赵维炳, 陈永辉, 龚友平. 平面应变有限元分析中砂井的处理方法[J]. 水利学报, 1998(6): 53-57. (ZHAO Wei-bing, CHEN Yong-hui, GONG You-ping. A methodology for modeling sand-drain ground in plain strain analysis[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1998(6):53-57. (in Chinese))
    [9] CHAI J C, SHEN S L, MIURA N, et al. Simple method of modeling PVD-improved subsoil[J]. Journal of geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(11): 965-972.
    [10] INDRARATNA B, RUJIKIATKAMJORN C, SATHANAN- THAN I. Analytical and numerical solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 994-1014.
    [11] TRAN T A, MITACHI T. Equivalent plane strain modeling of vertical drains in soft ground under embankment combined with vacuum preloading[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2008, 35: 655-672.
    [12] CHEUNG Y K, LEE P K, XIE K H. Some remarks on two and three dimensional consolidation analysis of sand-drained ground[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1991, 12: 73-87.
    [13] 蒋春霞. 含竖向排水体地基轴对称固结及平面应变等效固结分析[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2005. (JIANG Chun-xia. Analysis of axisymmetrical and equivalent plain strain consolidation by vertical drains[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [14] 娄 荣. 砂井地基数值简化算法的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006. (LOU Rong. Study on the simplified methods for the numerical analysis of sand-drained ground[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006. (in Chinese))
    [15] YILDIZ A. Numerical modeling of vertical drains with advanced constitutive models[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(6): 1072-83.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  219
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  238
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2013-11-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回