基于广义塑性理论的堆石料动力本构模型研究

陈生水; 彭成; 傅中志

基于广义塑性理论的堆石料动力本构模型研究 English Version

陈生水^1,2,
彭成¹,
傅中志^1,2

1. 南京水利科学研究院，江苏南京 210029; 2. 水利部土石坝破坏机理与防控技术重点实验室，江苏南京 210029

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(90815024,51209141,51109141);水利行业公益性专项经费项目(201001014);“十一五”国家科技支撑计划专题项目(2009BK56B02)

详细信息

作者简介:
陈生水(1962– )，男，江苏高淳人，教授级高级工程师，博士生导师，主要从事土石坝与岩土工程方面的科学研究与技术咨询工作。E-mail: sschen@nhri.cn

中图分类号: TU47
计量
- 文章访问数: 1213
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 311
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-12-29
- 发布日期: 2012-12-19

Dynamic constitutive model for rockfill materials based on generalized plasticity theory

1. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earth-Rock Dam Failure Mechanism and Safety Control Techniques, Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210029, China

摘要

摘要: 分析了堆石料在等幅与不等幅应力循环荷载作用下的变形特性,以此为基础,确定了不同加载过程中堆石料的剪胀方程,加载方向,切线模量及塑性模量,建立了一个可以考虑堆石料循环加载特性的广义塑性本构模型.模型将所有的加卸载阶段都视为弹塑性过程,并在剪胀方程中引入老化函数来考虑体积应变积累对剪胀(缩)性的影响.模型共有12个参数,均可通过常规室内单调及循环加载试验确定.为验证模型的有效性,依据试验资料确定了两种不同堆石料的本构模型参数,并对等幅循环三轴压缩与不等幅循环三轴压缩试验进行了模拟.两种材料在不同围压下的模型预测结果与试验数据均吻合良好,表明模型可以有效地反映循环荷载作用下堆石料应力应变曲线的滞回特性与永久变形的积累.
- 堆石料 /
- 循环荷载 /
- 三轴压缩 /
- 广义塑性 /
- 本构模型
Abstract: The stress-strain behaviors of typical rockfill materials under cyclic loading with constant and variable stress amplitudes are analyzed. The stress-dilatancy equations, loading directions, tangential modulus and the representations of plastic modulus are derived based on experimental observations, and a generalized plasticity model is proposed to simulate the dynamic behaviours of rockfill materials. The model treats all the loading-unloading-reloading phases as elastoplastic ones and captures the hardening effects (the influences of the accumulated volumetric strain on the dilatancy and the overall stress strain behaviour) during cyclic loading by incorporating an aging function into the stress-dilatancy equations. There are totally 12 parameters involved in the proposed model, all of which can be determined by the conventional monotonic and cyclic tests. To check the validity of the proposed model, the parameters of two rockfill materials are calibrated based on the experimental data, and the typical cycle triaxial compression tests with constant and variable stress amplitudes are modeled. Satisfactory agreement between the numerical and experimental results under different confining pressures confirms the capability of the proposed model in capturing the hysteretic stress-strain behaviours and the accumulation of permanent deformation under cyclic loading effectively.
- rockfill material /
- cyclic loading /
- triaxial compression /
- generalized plasticity /
- constitutive model

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	胡聿贤. 地震工程学[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1988. HU Yu-xian. Earthquake engineering[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 1988.
[2]	陈生水, 霍家平, 章为民. 5.12汶川地震对紫坪铺混凝土面板坝的影响及原因分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(6): 795-801 CHEN Sheng-shui, HUO Jia-ping, ZHANG Wei-min. Analysis of effects of 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake on Zipingpu concrete face rockfill dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(6): 795-801. (in Chinese))
[3]	刘汉龙, 秦红玉, 高玉峰, 等. 堆石粗粒料颗粒破碎试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(4): 562-566 LIU Han-long, QIN Hong-yu, GAO Yu-feng,,et al. Experimental study on particle breakage of rockfill and coarse aggregates[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(4): 562-566. (in Chinese))
[4]	陈生水, 韩华强, 傅华. 循环荷载作用下堆石料应力变形特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(8): 1151-1157 CHEN Sheng-shui, HAN Hua-qiang, FU Hua. Stress and deformation behaviors of rockfill under cyclic loadings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(8): 1151-1157. (in Chinese))
[5]	SCHOFIELD A, WROTH P. Critical state soil mechanics[M]. London: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
[6]	KOLYMBAS D. Introduction to hypoplasticity[M]// Advances in Geotechnical Engineering and Tunneling. Rotterdam: BALKEMA, 2000.
[7]	MATSUOKA H, SUN D A. The SMP concept-based 3D constitutive models for geomaterials[M]. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
[8]	YAO Y P, HOU W, ZHOU A N. UH model: three-dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays[J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(5): 451-469
[9]	KIM M K, LADE P V. Single hardening constitutive model for frictional materials I. Plastic potential function[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1988, 5(4): 307-324
[10]	KIM M K, LADE P V. Single hardening constitutive model for frictional materials II. Yield criterion and plastic work contours[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1988, 6(1): 13-29
[11]	KRAMER S L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
[12]	刘小生, 王钟宁, 汪小刚, 等. 面板坝大型振动台模型试验与动力分析[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005. LIU Xiao-sheng, WANG Zhong-ning, WANG Xiao-gang,,et al. Large-scale shaking table tests and seismic response analysis for concrete faced rockfill dams[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2005.
[13]	PASTOR M, ZIENKIEWICZ O C, CHAN A H C. Generalized plasticity and the modelling of soil behaviour[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1990, 14(3): 151-190
[14]	LING H I, YANG S T. Unified sand model based on the critical state and generalized plasticity[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 132(2): 1380-1391
[15]	LING H I, LIU H B. Pressure-level dependency and densification behaviour of sand through generalized plasticity model[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2003, 129(8): 851-860
[16]	PRADHAN T B S, TATSUOKA F, SATO Y. Experimental stress-dilatancy relations of sand subjected to cyclic loading[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1989, 29(1): 45-64
[17]	PRADHAN T B S, TATSUOKA F. On stress-dilatancy equations of sand subjected to cyclic loading[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1989, 29(1): 65-81
[18]	陈生水, 傅中志, 彭成. 考虑颗粒破碎的堆石料广义塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(10): 1489-1495 CHEN Sheng-shui, FU Zhong-zhi, PENG Cheng. A generalized plasticity model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1489-1495. (in Chinese))
[19]	NISHI K, KANATANI M. Constitutive relations for sand under cyclic loading based on elasto-plasticity theory[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1990, 30(2): 43-59
[20]	MATSUOKA H, YAO Y P, SUN D A. The Cam-clay models modified by the SMP criterion[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(1): 81-95