• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

杭州深厚软 黏 土中某深大基坑的性状研究

应宏伟, 杨永文

应宏伟, 杨永文. 杭州深厚软 黏 土中某深大基坑的性状研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12): 1838-1846.
引用本文: 应宏伟, 杨永文. 杭州深厚软 黏 土中某深大基坑的性状研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12): 1838-1846.
YING Hong-wei, YANG Yong-wen. Characteristics of a large and deep soft clay excavation in Hangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(12): 1838-1846.
Citation: YING Hong-wei, YANG Yong-wen. Characteristics of a large and deep soft clay excavation in Hangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(12): 1838-1846.

杭州深厚软 黏 土中某深大基坑的性状研究  English Version

基金项目: “十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目( 2008BAJ06B01 );浙江省重点创新团队支持计划( 2009R50050 )
详细信息
    作者简介:

    应宏伟 (1971 – ) ,男,博士,副教授,主要从事土力学、地基处理、地下工程的教学与科研工作。

  • 中图分类号: TU43 文献标识码: A 文章编号: 1000 – 4548(2011)12 – 1838 – 09

Characteristics of a large and deep soft clay excavation in Hangzhou

  • 摘要: 介绍了杭州深厚软黏土中深度为14.85~17.35 m、采用密排连续排桩作为围护墙的大型多层支撑基坑工程监测实例。实测内容包括基坑施工过程中围护墙与土体水平位移、周围地面沉降、内支撑轴力、土压力和孔隙水压力等。研究表明:软黏土中大型基坑的水平位移明显大于狭窄基坑,基础底板施工期间基坑的“蠕变”现象明显,开挖深度、空间效应、隔断墙的设置、坑壁临近既有地下室等均是影响基坑水平位移的重要因素;坑外横向地表沉降呈抛物线型分布,沉降影响范围约为开挖深度的2.5倍, 最大沉降位于坑外约0.67倍挖深处,最大沉降与最大水平位移关系约为 ,坑外纵向沉降大致呈马鞍形,沉降最大值位于基坑中部附近,纵向沉降影响范围大于基坑开挖范围;多层支撑支护结构中各层支撑的轴力随开挖和拆撑工况的变化而动态调整,第2层支撑轴力明显大于其它2层支撑;深厚软黏土中多支撑支护结构的土压力分布在支撑深度范围表现出“土拱”效应;随开挖的进行坑外土体的孔压逐渐减小,由于开挖卸荷产生了负超静孔压。
    Abstract: A 14.85 m~17.35 m-deep multi-strutted soft clay excavation in Hangzhou has been monitored. The excavation is supported by contiguous piles in row. The monitoring covers wall and soil deflections, surface ground settlements, axial forces of concrete struts, earth pressures and pore water pressures. It is shown that the maximum horizontal deformations of the large scale excavation are far larger than those narrow excavations. “Creep” deformation occurs apparently during the curing of the bottom slab of the basement. The excavation depth, space effects, partition wall and a basement adjacent to the excavation are the important factors that affect the deflections of the excavation. The distributions of the surface settlements seem to be parabolic, and the settlement influence zone can reach a distance of about 2.5H, where H is the final excavation depth, and the location of the maximum settlement is at 0.67H away from the retaining wall. The relationship between the maximum ground settlement and the maximum horizontal deformation can be summarized as . The distribution of the longitudinal settlements is in a saddle shape, and the longitudinal surface settlement trench is wider than the pit. The axial forces of the struts change dynamically during the excavation and construction, and the magnitude of the axial forces of the second-level struts seems to be larger than that of the other two level struts. “Soil arching” phenomena are found at the depths where the struts are located, which result in the nonlinear distributions of the earth pressure on the wall. The measured pore water pressures decrease during the excavation. The negvative excess pore water pressures occur in the ground due to the unloading on the excavation boundary.
  • [1] 杨光华 . 深基坑开挖中多支撑支护结构的土压力问题 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 1998, 20 (6): 113 – 115. (YANG Guang-hua. The earth pressure problems for the multi-braced retaining structure of deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 20 (6): 113 – 115. (in Chinese))
    [2] 俞建霖 , 龚晓南 . 深基坑空间效应的有限元分析 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 1999, 21 (1): 21 – 25. (YU Jian-lin, GONG Xiao-nan. Spatial behavior analysis of deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21 (1): 21 – 25. ( in Chinese))
    [3] 应宏伟 , 蒋 波 , 谢康和 . 挡土墙后土拱效应分析 [J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版) , 2005, 39 (1): 131 – 136. (YING Hong-wei, JIANG Bo, XIE Kang-he. Analysis on soil arching behind retaining wall[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2005, 39 (1): 131 – 136. (in Chinese)).
    [4] 徐前卫 , 马险峰 , 朱合华 , 等 . 软土地基超深基坑开挖的离心模型试验研究 [J]. 土木工程学报 , 2009, 42 (12): 154 – 161. (XU Qian-wei, MA Xian-feng, ZHU He-hua, et al. Centrifugal model test on extra-deep foundation pit excavations in soft ground[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42 (12): 154 – 161. (in Chinese))
    [5] JGJ 120 — 1999 建筑基坑支护技术规程 [S]. 北京 : 中国建筑工业出版社 , 1999. (JGJ 120 — 1999 Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations[S]. Beijing: China Agriculture and Building Press, 1999. (in Chinese))
    [6] LIU G B, NG C W W, WANG Z W. Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131 (8): 1004 – 1013.
    [7] 应宏伟 , 王奎华 , 谢康和 , 等 . 杭州解百商业城半逆作法深基坑支护设计与监测 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2001, 23 (1): 79 – 83. (YING Hong-wei, WANG Kui-hua, XIE Kang-he, et al. Design and monitoring of deep excavation with semi-top-down method in Hangzhou Jiebai commercial building[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23 (1): 79 – 83. (in Chinese))
    [8] NG C W W. Observed performance of multi-propped excavation in stiff clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 124 (9): 889 – 905.
    [9] 刘国彬 , 黄院雄 , 侯学渊 . 水及土压力的实测研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报 , 2000, 19 (2): 205 – 210. (LIU Guo-bin, HUANG Yuan-xiong, HOU Xue-yuan. Discussion on water and earth pressure of supporting structure in soft area[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics Engineering, 2000, 19 (2): 205 – 210. (in Chinese))
    [10] 杨有海 , 王建军 , 武进广 , 等 . 杭州地铁秋涛路车站深基坑信息化施工监测分析 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2008, 30 (10): 1550 – 1554. (YANG You-hai, WANG Jian-jun, WU Jin-guang, et al. Informationized construction monitoring analysis of deep foundation pit for Qiutao Road station of Hangzhou Metrol[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30 (10): 1550 – 1554. (in Chinese))
    [11] 欧章煜 , 谢百钩 . 深开挖邻产保护之探讨 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2008, 30 ( 增刊 ): 509 – 517. (OU Chang-yu, HSIEH Pio-go. Building protection measures in deep excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30 (S0): 509 – 517. (in Chinese))
    [12] MANA A I, CLOUGH G W. Prediction of movements for braced cuts in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1981, 107 (6): 759 – 777.
    [13] WANG J H, XU Z H, WANG W D. Wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2010, 136 (7): 1090 – 0214.
    [14] CLOUGH G W, O’ROURKE T D. Construction induced movements of in situ walls[C]// Proc ASCE Conference on Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures. New York: ASCE, 1990: 439 – 470.
    [15] POTTS D M, DAY R A. The effect of wall stiffness on bending moments[C]// The 4th International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1991: 435 – 444.
    [16] LONG M. Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2001, 127 (3): 203 – 224.
    [17] LEUNG E H Y, NG C W W. Wall and ground movements associated with deep excavations supported by cast in situ wall in mixed ground condition[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 133 (2): 1090 – 0241.
    [18] PECK R B. Deep excavation & tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proc 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Mexiocity, 1969: 225 – 281.
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2011-12-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回