高堆石坝土工格栅抗震加固效果分析

虞一鸣; 何蕴龙; 伍小玉

高堆石坝土工格栅抗震加固效果分析 English Version

1. 武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430072 ； 2. 杭州市水利水电勘测设计院，浙江杭州 310016 ； 3. 中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院，四川成都 610072

详细信息

作者简介:
虞一鸣 (1985 – ) ，男，浙江嘉兴人，硕士，主要从事水工结构设计方面的工作。

中图分类号: TU413
计量
- 文章访问数: 01182
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0497
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2011-09-14

Aseismic strengthening effect of geogrid in high rockfill dam

(1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. Hangzhou Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hangzhou 310016, China; 3. HydroChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation, Chengdu 610072, China)

摘要

摘要: 强震区高堆石坝坝顶堆石体常由于地震加速度放大效应处于不稳定状态，目前比较经济有效的抗震措施是在坝顶一定范围内加筋来提高堆石体的强度和自稳能力。土工格栅以其与土石体相互作用的优越性而被广泛运用于土石坝坝顶抗震加固工程。以 240 m 高长河坝心墙堆石坝为例，分析土工格栅对强震区坝顶堆石体的抗震加固效果。运用时程法对加筋坝体进行动力反应分析，利用动力响应应力结果并结合 Newmark 滑块法理论，采用滑面应力分析有限元法对加筋限制高堆石坝地震永久变形的工程效果进行研究和探讨。结果表明，动力作用下格栅所受最大拉力远小于其抗拉强度，且加筋基本不影响坝体动力反应结果。可一旦坝坡发生滑移，加筋能使地震永久位移减少 40% ～ 50% ，有效限制坝顶堆石体侧向滑移，提高了坝体抗震稳定性。抗震稳定性又对加筋长度与竖向加筋间距敏感，较适宜的加筋长度及间距分别为 40 ～ 60 m 和 1 ～ 4 m 。
- 高堆石坝 /
- 土工格栅 /
- 动力反应 /
- 永久位移
Abstract: Rockfill is unstable because of the magnification of earthquake acceleration on the top of high rockfill dams located in strong earthquake areas. To improve the strength and stability of the rockfill, reinforcement for the rockfill at the upper part of dams is an economical and effective measure. Geogrid has been widely used in aseismic reinforcement because of its superiority in interaction with rock and earth. 240 m-high Changhe Dam core rockfill dam is taken as an example, and the aseismic strengthening effect is analyzed when geogrid is used in the rockfill of dam crest. Dynamic response of the reinforced dam is analyzed by means of the time-history method. The results are introduced into the finite element method for slip surface stress analysis to investigate the effectiveness of restricting permanent deformation of high reinforced rockfill dams based on the Newmark’s sliding mass method. The results indicate that during the earthquake the force on the geogrid is much less than its tensile strength, and reinforcement has little influence on the dynamic response of the dam. But once slope slips, the reinforcement reduces the permanent deformation up to 40%~50%, limits lateral movement of the rockfill at the dam crest effectively and improves the aseismic stability of high rockfill dams. The stability is sensitive to reinforced length and vertical spacing, and their rational values are 40~60 m and 1~4 m respectively.
- high rockfill dam /
- geogrid /
- dynamic response /
- permanent deformation

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	孔宪京 , 邹德高 , 邓学晶 , 等 . 高土石坝综合抗震措施及其效果的验算 [J]. 水利学报 , 2006, 37 (12): 1489 – 1495. (KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao, DENG Xue-jing, et al. Comprehesive earthquake resistant measure of high earth-rockfill dams and effectiveness verification[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37 (12): 1489 – 1495. (in Chinese))
[2]	马家燕 . 土工格栅应用于水工大坝初探 [J] . 四川水利发电 , 2007, 26 (6): 84 – 85. (MA Jia-yan. Exploration of geogrid used in dams[J]. Sichuan Water Power, 2007, 26 (6): 84 – 85. (in Chinese) )
[3]	李红军 , 迟世春 , 林皋 . 高心墙堆石坝坝坡加筋抗震稳定分析 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2007 , 29 (12): 1881 – 1887. (LI Hong-jun, CHI Shi-chun, LIN Gao. Aseismic stability analysis for reinforced slopes of high core rock-fill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Goetechnical Engineering, 2007 , 29 (12): 1881 – 1887. (in Chinese) )
[4]	欧阳仲春 . 现代土工加筋技术 [M]. 北京 : 人民交通出版社 , 1991. (OUYANG Zhong-chun. Modern technology of reinforced soil[M]. Beijing: China Communication Press, 1991. (in Chinese) )
[5]	YANG Z. Strength and deformation characteristic of reinforced sand[D]. Los Angeles, California: University of California, 1972.
[6]	杨果林 , 肖宏彬 . 现代加筋土挡土墙结构 [M]. 北京 : 煤炭工业出版社 , 2002. (YANG Guo-lin, XIAO Hong-bin. Modern reinforced earth retaining wall structure[M]. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House, 2002. (in Chinese) )
[7]	介玉新 , 王乃东 , 李广信 . 加筋土计算中等效附加应力法的改进 [J] . 岩土力学 , 2007, 28 ( 增刊 ): 129 – 132. (JIE Yu-xin, WANG Nai-dong, LI Guang-xin. Modified equivalent additional stress method for numerical analysis of reinforced soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28 (S0): 129 – 132. (in Chinese) )
[8]	王钊 . 土工合成材料的蠕变试验 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 1994 , 16 (6): 96 – 102. (WANG Zhao. Creep test of geosynthetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994 , 16 (6): 96 – 102. (in Chinese) )
[9]	赵川 , 周亦唐 . 土工格栅加筋碎石土大型三轴试验研究 [J] . 岩土力学 , 2001, 22 (4): 419 – 422. (ZHAO Chuan, ZHOU Yi-tang. Experimental study on polymer geogrid reinforced crushed gravel by large-scale triaxial test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2001, 22 (4): 419 – 422. (in Chinese) )
[10]	孙晋 . 加筋土动力特性试验研究 [D]. 山西 : 太原理工大学 , 2007. (SUN Jin. The experimental study on the dynamic behavior of reinforced soil[D]. Shanxi: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese))
[11]	倪汉根 , 金崇磐 . 大坝抗震特性与抗震计算 [M]. 辽宁 : 大连理工大学出版社 , 1994. (NI Han-gen, JIN Chong-pan. Aseismic character and calculation of dams[M]. Liaoning: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1994. (in Chinese) )
[12]	陈祖煜 . 土质边坡稳定分析 — 原理 , 方法 , 程序 [M]. 北京 : 水利水电出版社 , 2003. (CHEN Zu-yu. Stability analysis of soil slop-theory, method, program[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2003. (in Chinese))