• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

离心机模拟中渗流相似率的试验验证

王秋生, 陈祖煜, 隋海宾, 侯瑜京, 梁建辉

王秋生, 陈祖煜, 隋海宾, 侯瑜京, 梁建辉. 离心机模拟中渗流相似率的试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(8): 1235-1239.
引用本文: 王秋生, 陈祖煜, 隋海宾, 侯瑜京, 梁建辉. 离心机模拟中渗流相似率的试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(8): 1235-1239.
WANG Qiu-sheng, CHEN Zu-yu, SUI Hai-bin, HOU Yu-jing, LIANG Jian-hui. Modelling seepage flow velocity in centrifuge models[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(8): 1235-1239.
Citation: WANG Qiu-sheng, CHEN Zu-yu, SUI Hai-bin, HOU Yu-jing, LIANG Jian-hui. Modelling seepage flow velocity in centrifuge models[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(8): 1235-1239.

离心机模拟中渗流相似率的试验验证  English Version

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展 规划“ 973 ”项目( 2007CB714102 ); 国家自然科学基金资助项目( 50779073 )
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王秋生 (1977 – ) ,男,山东昌乐人,讲师,博士后,主要从事土的本构关系、离心模型试验方面的研究

  • 中图分类号: TU411

Modelling seepage flow velocity in centrifuge models

  • 摘要: 结合黏性土的压缩特性和 Kozeny-Carman 方程,考虑离心加速度变化对土体固有渗透率的影响,推导了渗流速度和离心加速度的关系式。参考常规渗流试验装置的构造,并结合离心模型试验的特点,研制了常水头离心渗流试验装置。应用该装置针对糯扎渡高心墙堆石坝的心墙黏土,分别进行了常规渗流试验和 10 g , 20 g , 30 g 常水头离心渗流试验。试验结果表明: Ng ( N 倍重力加速度)和 1 g 条件下渗透系数的比值随离心加速度的增大逐渐减小,但变化范围不大,接近于 N 。研究结果对于深入认识离心模型试验中的渗流相似准则具有重要意义。
    Abstract: Based on the characteristics of clay compression and the Kozeny-Carman equation, the relation between seepage flow velocity and centrifugal accelerations is deduced considering the change of intrinsic permeability. An apparatus for constant head seepage tests is developed considering the set-up of conventional seepage test apparatus and the characteristics of centrifugal model tests. A series of seepage tests (1 g, 10 g, 20 g, 30 g) are performed on Nuozhadu core-wall clay by means of the apparatus. It is concluded that the ratio of Ng and 1 g hydraulic conductivity decreases with the increase of centrifugal acceleration, but the variation is small and the ratio is close to N. The research results are important for understanding the scaling of seepage flow velocity in centrifuge models.
  • [1] LAUT P. Application of centrifugal tests in connection with studies of flow patterns of contaminated water in soil structures[J]. Géotechnique, 1975, 25: 401 – 406.
    [2] GOODINGS D J. Relationships for centrifugal modelling of seepage and surface flow effects on embankment dams[J]. Géotechnique, 1982, 32: 149 – 152.
    [3] BUTTERFIELD R. Scale-modelling of fluid in geotechnical centrifuges[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40 (6): 39 – 45.
    [4] ARULANANDAN K, THOMPSON P Y, KUTTER B L, et al. Centrifuge modelling of transport processes for pollutants in soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1988, 114 (2): 185 – 205.
    [5] SINGH D N, GUPTA K A. Modelling hydraulic conductivity in a small centrifuge[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37 (1): 1150 – 1155.
    [6] THUSYANTHAN N I, MADABHUSHI S P G. Scaling of seepage flow velocity in centrifuge models[C]// CUED/D-SOILS/TR-326, 2003.
    [7] BEAR J. Dynamics of fluids in porous media[M]. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company, 1972.
    [8] TAYLOR R N. Geotechnical centrifuge technology[M]. Blackie Academic & Professional, 1995.
    [9] TAYLOR R N. Discussion on Tan&Scott[J]. Géotechnique, 1987, 37 (1): 131 – 133.
    [10] LORRAINE E F, JOHN S S. Use of porosity to estimate hydraulic properties of vocanic tuffs[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2003, 26: 561 – 571.
    [11] BUTTERFIELD R A. Natural compression law for soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1979, 29: 445 – 458.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1478
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  974
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2011-08-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回