Research progress in ecological treatment of expansive soil
-
摘要: 膨胀土是一种遇水急剧膨胀变形、失水迅速收缩开裂的问题土，需对其进行治理以满足工程要求。对近年来新发展的膨胀土生态治理材料进行了归纳、总结，并根据其组分、特点分为地聚合物类、离子固化剂、有机高分子材料类、微生物与酶类和生物胶类，并阐述了各类固化剂的材料特点、固化效果及作用机理，均符合新时代发展要求，可作为一种可持续的、环保的、多功能的技术大范围推广应用，最后从生态治理和推广应用角度探讨了目前需要克服的问题。Abstract: The expansive soil is a kind of problematic soil that rapidly expands and deforms when encountering water and rapidly shrinks and cracks when losing water. It needs to be treated to meet the engineering requirements. The newly developed ecological treatment materials for the expansive soil in recent years are summarized and categorized, and the are classified according to their components and characteristics into-geopolymer, ion curing agent, organic polymer material, microorganism and enzyme, and biopolymer. The material characteristics, treatment effectiveness, and stabilization mechanisms of various treatment materials are elaborated, and they all meet the requirements of the new era and can be widely promoted and applied as a sustainable, environmentally friendly and versatile technology. Finally, the urgent issues that need to be addressed from the perspectives of ecological governance and promotion are discussed.
-
0. 引言
中国大规模的基础设施建设工程每年产生大量的建筑垃圾，建筑垃圾可通过破碎、清洗、筛分、分级等二次处理后生产出再生骨料[1-2]。再生骨料可用于道路铺筑、工程回填、地基加固等岩土工程领域[3-4]。
强夯碎石桩因其具有提高地基承载力、减小地基沉降和加速地基固结排水等优点常应用于软土地基加固中，施工工序如图 1所示：首先将钢套筒打至设计深度并筒内清泥，套筒内分层填入碎石并使用夯锤夯实，上拔套筒一定高度并再次填料和夯实，直到形成串珠状的散体桩复合地基[5]。许多学者对碎石桩的承载性能、荷载传递、破坏模式等进行了研究[6-8]。受桩长、桩周土体、加载方式的影响，碎石桩可能出现的破坏有3种：鼓胀破坏、刺入破坏和剪切破坏。基于有限单元法和有限差分法等已广泛应用于碎石桩宏观特性的研究[9-10]，然而碎石桩由散体材料组成，连续方法不能准确地模拟其特性。
通过建立三维离散-连续耦合数值模型对再生骨料强夯桩的承载性能进行模拟，研究了再生骨料强夯桩的承载变形机理、桩体破坏模式及荷载传递规律。并分析了不同桩长和不同孔隙率的再生骨料强夯桩的承载性能。以期能为再生骨料强夯桩的推广应用提供参考。
1. 离散-连续耦合数值模型
1.1 数值模型建立
再生骨料强夯桩按图 1所示方法进行成桩，具体细节详见文献[11]。试验选用的再生骨料相对质量密度为2.62，内摩擦角为39度，粒径范围为0.6~9.5 mm，桩周土体为天津路基地表土，相对质量密度为2.65，厚度为60 cm，含水率为15%，土体黏聚力为20 kPa，内摩擦角为32度。成桩后桩长为60 cm，桩径为6 cm。成桩完成后进行加载试验，采用位移加载的方式施加荷载，加载速度为1 mm/min，加载至5 cm时停止加载。
采用FLAC-PFC耦合方法进行承载模拟，如图 2（a）所示，耦合数值模型包括3部分：有限差分模型（桩周土）、离散元模型（散体桩）和耦合墙。模型的建立步骤与室内模型试验一致，分为土基填筑、成桩和加载三步。首先建立桩周土的有限差分模型，采用的本构模型为莫尔-库仑，所用参数见表 1，接下来先把散体桩区域进行挖空，然后在桩底、桩顶和桩侧生成墙形成封闭区域使得颗粒在此区域内生成，桩底墙直径为25 cm，桩顶墙直径为6 cm，桩侧耦合墙直径为6 cm、高为60 cm，颗粒之间采用抗转动线性接触模型（rrlinear model），颗粒细观参数通过直剪试验进行标定后列于表 2。
表 1 土体参数Table 1. Parameters of soilsc/kPa ϕ/(°) E/MPa ν ρ/(g⋅cm-3) 20 32 10 0.4 1830 表 2 再生骨料标定参数Table 2. Calibration parameters of recycled aggregates接触类型 Ball-ball Ball-wall 有效模量E*/Pa 2.0×107 5.0×107 刚度比k* 1.5 1.5 抗转动摩擦系数μr 0.5 — 摩擦系数μ 0.5 0.5 阻尼比 0.7 0.7 孔隙比 0.86 — 最后在再生骨料强夯桩上方生成与桩径相同的加载板，以1 mm/min的恒定速率对碎石桩进行轴向加载，直至位移达到5 cm。如图 2（b）所示，在桩内布置19个测量圆，球体中心垂直位置位于-3~-57 cm处（土表z=0），获得测量圆内应力状态（轴向和径向应力）和微观特征（孔隙率和配位数）。在桩周土有限差分模型中布置21个监测节点，获取连续-离散界面节点处的侧向变形。
1.2 数值模型验证
图 3（a）为模型试验与数值模拟的荷载-沉降曲线对比图，两者曲线变化趋势相同，吻合程度较好。从图 3可以看出，在加载初期沉降达到5 mm之前曲线基本呈线性增加，桩顶应力在较小的沉降量下即迅速增加到约750 kPa；当沉降超过10 mm时，非线性变形明显发展；当桩顶应力超过1500 kPa后沉降迅速发展，沉降超过20 mm后p-s曲线几乎竖直，预示着再生骨料强夯桩丧失了承载能力。
图 3（b）为模型试验与数值模拟的桩体径向变形对比图，从图中可以看出，两者曲线整体变化趋势相同，桩体径向变形都主要发生在桩身20 cm（约3倍桩径）及以上，桩身20 cm以下变形较小，最大变形量均为9 mm左右，桩体呈现上部凸出中下部小的形态。
图 3（c）为模型试验与数值模拟的桩身应力传递系数对比图，两条曲线均为桩体最终破坏时测得，从图中可以看出随埋深增加应力传递系数逐渐减小，超过3倍桩径后传递系数均小于0.2，表明大部分荷载均由碎石桩上部承担，模拟和试验具有较好的一致性。数值模拟中上部第一个和第二个数据监测点异常减小是因为此时颗粒大部分被加载板下压，在测量球中的颗粒较少，所以其平均应力较小使得传递系数较小。
2. 结果分析
2.1 桩周土变形和应力
图 4给出了不同桩顶沉降下（18，34，50 mm）桩周土体的变形和应力云图。从图 4（a）可以看出桩体压缩主要产生在桩体上部，随着沉降增加该段区域内碎石产生剧烈鼓胀变形，从而引起桩周土体产生水平位移。土体水平应力在桩体鼓胀导致的水平挤压下增长剧烈。
![]()
图 4 不同沉降下桩周土变形和应力Figure 4. Deformations and stresses of soil around column under different settlements图 4（b）显示桩周上部土体附近产生了较大的竖直应力增量，增加的竖向应力主要由桩侧摩阻力及变形后的桩体与土体挤压产生，并通过土体剪应力以一定扩散角度传递到远离桩体的土体区域。图 4（c）显示桩周土体在靠近桩体压缩段也出现了较大的竖向位移，但位移量明显小于碎石沉降量。因此可以判断在桩体压缩强烈的范围内，桩体和桩周土体产生了较大相对位移。加载结束后土地表面产生了明显的隆起。
图 4（d）为不同沉降下桩周土体剪切应变分布，土体剪切应变大小直接反映桩体变形对土体的扰动强弱。随着桩体沉降量的增加，土体剪切扰动区域在桩体水平鼓胀推动下向四周扩展，最终观察到贯通地表的连续剪切滑动面。
2.2 桩体变形和应力
图 5（a）为不同沉降时桩体鼓胀变形沿桩身分布图，桩体鼓胀变形整体呈现上部突出中下部小的形态。随着沉降增加鼓胀变形逐渐增加，主要鼓胀变形发生在桩体3倍桩径的埋深范围内，径向应变最大为14%，最大鼓胀变形位置大约在1.5倍桩径处。图 5（b）为桩体水平应力沿桩身分布图，从图中可以看出水平应力随沉降增大而增大，随埋深增大发生较大衰减。与径向应变变化规律一致。
![]()
图 5 不同沉降下桩体变形和应力Figure 5. Column deformations and stresses under different settlements图 6显示了再生骨料颗粒在不同沉降下接触力的分布。随沉降增大，桩顶处直接承受荷载的强接触力链越来越明显，且其接触力值越来越大。接触力链主要集中在桩体的上部，大概3倍桩径深度内，这与径向应变一致。在加载过程中，强接触力链承担桩顶荷载后再通过若干弱接触力链向下部及桩周土体传递荷载。
![]()
图 6 不同沉降下颗粒间接触力链Figure 6. Contact force chains between particles under different settlements2.3 破坏模式
再生骨料强夯桩的破坏模式示意图如图 7所示。随着荷载的增加，再生骨料强夯桩最大鼓胀变形（1.5倍孔径）附近的土体首先进入屈服状态，接下来的荷载会使石柱产生较大的鼓胀变形并挤压石柱周围土体，造成土体塑性区以半球形式向周边扩展。随着荷载继续增加，桩周土体在桩体鼓胀变形的挤压下形成贯通地表的连续滑裂面，地表发生隆起变形，影响范围约为18 cm（3倍桩径）。桩体则最终因为鼓胀段（3倍桩径）径向应变无法限制而丧失承载力。
3. 参数分析
3.1 桩体长度的影响
其他条件不变，只改变桩体长度，得到不同长度下再生骨料强夯桩的荷载-沉降曲线如图 8所示。可以看出桩长过小时，再生骨料强夯桩的承载力很低，只有540 kPa，在桩顶沉降20 mm时便发生破坏，破坏形式为刺入破坏。随着桩长的增加，承载力逐渐提高。桩长7d时与全长桩（10d）时承载力接近，这说明全长桩底部3倍桩径并不承担荷载，有效长度为7d。从5d开始，再生骨料强夯桩发生鼓胀破坏。
3.2 孔隙率的影响
其他条件不变（桩长为10d），只改变孔隙率，得到不同孔隙率下再生骨料强夯桩的荷载-沉降曲线如图 9所示。
随着孔隙率减小，再生骨料强夯桩的承载性能逐渐提高。在孔隙率为0.3，0.35时，曲线随着沉降增加先为线性增加，然后快速发展，最后曲线趋于竖直，而孔隙率为0.4，0.45，0.5时，曲线近似线性变化，原因是桩体孔隙率较大时，颗粒间咬合力较弱，颗粒向桩周土位移时，桩周土能提供较强的侧限作用，当增加到一定沉降后，桩体被压密，此时颗粒不断挤向土体，因侧限作用失效产生破坏。
4. 结论
通过建立三维离散-连续耦合数值模型对再生骨料强夯桩的承载性能进行模拟，研究了再生骨料强夯桩的的承载变形机理、桩体破坏模式及荷载传递规律。并分析了不同桩长和不同孔隙率的再生骨料强夯桩的
承载性能。主要得到以下3点结论。
（1）桩周土体受颗粒挤压变形导致桩体上部位置位移和应力发展迅速。在水平方向表现为鼓胀变形，在竖直方向上地表会有隆起和抬升。鼓胀变形主要集中在3倍桩径范围内。
（2）竖向荷载使桩体产生较大的鼓胀变形并挤压石柱周围土体，造成土体塑性区以半球形式向周边扩展。随着荷载继续增加，桩周土体在桩体鼓胀变形的挤压下形成贯通地表的连续剪切滑裂面。
（3）桩长小于3d，桩体发生刺入破坏，大于3d时发生鼓胀破坏。全长桩底部3倍桩径并不承担荷载，有效长度为7d。随着孔隙率减小，再生骨料强夯桩的承载性能逐渐提高。
-
![]()
![]()
图 2 各类固化剂改良膨胀土SEM图
Figure 2. SEM images of different stabilizers-improved expansive soil
![]()
图 3 聚合物改良膨胀土机理示意图
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of mechanism of polymer-modified expansive soil
-
[1] 冷挺, 唐朝生, 徐丹, 等. 膨胀土工程地质特性研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 2018, 26(1): 112-128. LENG Ting, TANG Chaosheng, XU Dan, et al. Advance on the engineering geological characteristics of expansive soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018, 26(1): 112-128. (in Chinese)
[2] 杨和平, 李宇峙, 陈虔礼. 膨胀土路基病害及防治措施[J]. 公路, 1995, 40(5): 8-12. YANG Heping, LI (Yu)(Shi| Zhi), CHEN Qianli. Disease of expansive soil subgrade and its prevention measures[J]. Highway, 1995, 40(5): 8-12. (in Chinese)
[3] 杨和平, 章高峰, 郑健龙, 等. 膨胀土填筑公路路堤的物理处治技术[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(4): 491-500. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.04.001 YANG Heping, ZHANG Gaofeng, ZHENG Jianlong, et al. Physical treating techniques of highway embankments filled with expansive soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 491-500. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.04.001
[4] 徐永福, 程岩, 肖杰, 等. 膨胀土滑坡和工程边坡新型防治技术研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(7): 1281-1294. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202207009 XU Yongfu, CHENG Yan, XIAO Jie, et al. New prevention and control technology for expansive soil slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(7): 1281-1294. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202207009
[5] 庄心善, 杨文博, 胡其志. 磷尾矿改良合肥膨胀土强度试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(5): 281-284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.05.048 ZHUANG Xinshan, YANG Wenbo, HU Qizhi. Experimental study on strength improvement of Hefei expansive soil by phosphorus tailings[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 281-284. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.05.048
[6] 李丽华, 黄畅, 李文涛, 等. 稻壳灰-矿渣固化膨胀土力学与微观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2821-2832, 2842. LI Lihua, HUANG Chang, LI Wentao, et al. Study on mechanical and microscopic characterization of expansive soil solidified by rice husk ash-granulated blast furnace slag[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 2821-2832, 2842. (in Chinese)
[7] 刘清秉, 项伟, 崔德山, 等. 离子土固化剂改良膨胀土的机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(4): 648-654. LIU Qingbing, XIANG Wei, CUI Deshan, et al. Mechanism of expansive soil improved by ionic soil stabilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 648-654. (in Chinese)
[8] HE S, YU X B, BANERJEE A, et al. Expansive soil treatment with liquid ionic soil stabilizer[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 2672(52): 185-194. doi: 10.1177/0361198118792996
[9] 黄河, 施斌, 刘瑾, 等. STW型生态土壤稳定剂改性膨胀土水理性质试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(8): 1236-1240. HUANG He, SHI Bin, LIU Jin, et al. Water-physical properties of expansive soils modified by STW ecotypic soil stabilizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1236-1240. (in Chinese)
[10] 孟令超, 朴淼, 张鸿秋, 等. 干湿循环条件下木质素改良膨胀土胀缩特性[J]. 工程地质学报, 2023, 31(2): 386-396. MENG Lingchao, PIAO Miao, ZHANG Hongqiu, et al. Swelling and shrinkage behaviour of expansive soil ameliorated by calcium lignosulphonate during wetting-drying cycles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2023, 31(2): 386-396. (in Chinese)
[11] 魏然, 张丽雅, 肖智睿, 等. 基于MICP技术的膨胀土变形控制机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(增刊1): 92-96. WEI Ran, ZHANG Liya, XIAO Zhirui, et al. Study on deformation control mechanism of expansive soil based on MICP technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S1): 92-96. (in Chinese)
[12] LI M, TAO X, LANG C, et al. Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation using yellow soybean for eco-friendly treatment of expansive soils[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2024, 24(3): 04024007.
[13] 王天亮, 王林, 刘松松, 等. 黄原胶和瓜尔胶改良膨胀土力学特性试验研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2023, 44(2): 1-10. WANG Tianliang, WANG Lin, LIU Songsong, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of expansive soil improved by xanthan gum and guar gum[J]. China Railway Science, 2023, 44(2): 1-10. (in Chinese)
[14] FIRMANSYAH D A, SOMANTRI A K, SIHOMBING A V R, et al. Optimization of the Atterberg Limits on expansive soil stabilized with chitosan biopolymer[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2024, 479: 06002.
[15] SEYREK E. Engineering behavior of clay soils stabilized with class C and class F fly ashes[J]. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 2018, 25(2): 273-287.
[16] KABETA W F, LEMMA H. Modeling the application of steel slag in stabilizing expansive soil[J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9(4): 4023-4030.
[17] 刘清秉, 项伟, 张伟锋, 等. 离子土壤固化剂改性膨胀土的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(8): 2286-2290. LIU Qingbing, XIANG Wei, ZHANG Weifeng, et al. Experimental study of ionic soil stabilizer-improves expansive soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(8): 2286-2290. (in Chinese)
[18] 朱锐, 王燕杰, 黄英豪, 等. 木质素纤维改良膨胀土的冻融特性及微观机理[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(2): 263-272. ZHU Rui, WANG Yanjie, HUANG Yinghao, et al. Freeze-thaw characteristics and microscopic mechanism of expansive soil improved by lignin fiber[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024, 40(2): 263-272. (in Chinese)
[19] TIWARI N, SATYAM N, SHARMA M. Micro-mechanical performance evaluation of expansive soil biotreated with indigenous bacteria using MICP method[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 10324.
[20] SHARMA J K, KHANDELWAL S. Performance evaluation of kota's black soil using perma-zyme[M]// Techno-Societal 2022. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023: 125-136.
[21] MEHMOOD M, GUO Y C, WANG L, et al. Influence of enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) on the engineering characteristics of expansive soil[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024: 1-16.
[22] HUANG J, KOGBARA R B, HARIHARAN N, et al. A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 305: 124685.
[23] 刘景锦, 罗昊鹏, 雷华阳, 等. 碱激发地质聚合物固化软土的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 565-574. LIU Jingjin, LUO Haopeng, LEI Huayang, et al. Research progress on application of alkali-activated geopolymers to stabilize soft soil[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(2): 565-574. (in Chinese)
[24] SHARMA A K, SIVAPULLAIAH P V. Ground granulated blast furnace slag amended fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizer[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(2): 205-212.
[25] TAHA M M M, FENG C P, AHMED S H S. Modification of mechanical properties of expansive soil from North China by using rice husk ash[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(11): 2789.
[26] ZHA F S, LIU S Y, DU Y J, et al. Behavior of expansive soils stabilized with fly ash[J]. Natural Hazards, 2008, 47(3): 509-523.
[27] COKCA E, YAZICI V, OZAYDIN V. Stabilization of expansive clays using granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and GBFS-cement[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2009, 27(4): 489-499.
[28] PARSAEI M, VAKILI A H, SALIMI M, et al. Effect of electric arc and ladle furnace slags on the strength and swelling behavior of cement-stabilized expansive clay[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(8): 6303-6320.
[29] ZOU W L, YE J B, HAN Z, et al. Effect of montmorillonite content and sodium chloride solution on the residual swelling pressure of an expansive clay[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77(19): 677.
[30] 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 等. 物理化学效应对膨胀土收缩特性的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 697-704. MA Tiantian, YU Haiwen, WEI Changfu, et al. Mechanism of physicochemical effect on the shrinkage of expansive soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 697-704. (in Chinese)
[31] 黄春, 刘尚营, 张春光, 等. NH4+, 尿素和聚乙二醇对蒙脱土的抑制膨胀作用[J]. 化学学报, 2003, 61(7): 983-988. HUANG, Chun LIU Shangying ZHANG Chunguang, et al. Inhibition behavior of NH4+, urea and polyethylene glycol on swelling of montmorillonite[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2003, 61(7): 983-988. (in Chinese)
[32] 钟玉健, 张晓超, 袁锐, 等. 非钙基土壤固化剂加固机理及其应用性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(14): 154-162. ZHONG Yujian, ZHANG Xiaochao, YUAN Rui, et al. Research progress in the stabilization mechanism of non-calcium-based soil stabilizer and its application performance[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(14): 154-162. (in Chinese)
[33] TAHER Z J, SCALIA J I, BAREITHER C A. Comparative assessment of expansive soil stabilization by commercially available polymers[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 24: 100387.
[34] SABERIAN M, PERERA S T A M, ZHU J S, et al. Investigating the impact of vinyl acetate-ethylene polymer on the mechanical and microstructural properties of expansive clay subgrade[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2024: 1-24.
[35] AL-ATROUSH E M. Reduction of soil swelling potential using PU polyurethane liquid foam[C]//Geo-Extreme 2021. Savannah, Georgia. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2021: 190-202.
[36] CHITTOORI B C S, RAHMAN T, BURBANK M. Microbial-facilitated calcium carbonate precipitation as a shallow stabilization alternative for expansive soil treatment[J]. Geotechnics, 2021, 1(2): 558-572.
[37] OUYANG Q W, XIAO H B, LI Z Y, et al. Experimental study on the influence of microbial content on engineering characteristics of improved expansive soil[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 863357.
[38] TIAN X W, XIAO H B, SU H, et al. Experimental study on creep and long-term strength characteristics of expansive soil improved by the MICP method[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2024, 17(6): 202.
[39] POONI J, GIUSTOZZI F, ROBERT D, et al. Durability of enzyme stabilized expansive soil in road pavements subjected to moisture degradation[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2019, 21: 100255.
[40] TIWARI A, SHARMA J K, GARG V. Stabilization of expansive soil using terrazyme[M]// Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021: 113-125.
[41] DILRUKSHI R A N, NAKASHIMA K, KAWASAKI S. Soil improvement using plant-derived urease-induced calcium carbonate precipitation[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 58(4): 894-910.
[42] DONG J, LIU X B. Application of improved enzyme induced calcium carbonate precipitation (EICP) technology in surface protection of earthen sites[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2022, 54: 146-154.
[43] ALMAJED A, LEMBOYE K, ARAB M G, et al. Mitigating wind erosion of sand using biopolymer-assisted EICP technique[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2020, 60(2): 356-371.
[44] PRABHAKAR, ANNADURAI R. Synergistic effect of Polyvinyl Acetate (PVA) and Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) on the mechanical properties of natural sands[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20: e03323.
[45] HAMZA M, NIE Z H, AZIZ M, et al. Strengthening potential of xanthan gum biopolymer in stabilizing weak subgrade soil[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2022, 24(9): 2719-2738.
[46] LATIFI N, HORPIBULSUK S, MEEHAN C L, et al. Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—an environmentally friendly soil stabilizer[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017, 29(2): 04016204.
[47] VYDEHI K V, ALI BAIG MOGHAL A, MARIYAM RASHEED R. Shrinkage characteristics of biopolymer treated expansive soil[C]// Geo-Congress 2022. Charlotte, North Carolina. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2022: 92-99.
[48] KANTESARIA N, CHANDRA P, SACHAN A. Stabilization of expansive soil using agar biopolymer[C]// IFCEE 2021. Dallas, Texas. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2021: 272-281.
[49] LIU S H, DU K, WEN K J, et al. Stabilization of expansive clayey soil through hydrogel for mechanical improvements[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 21(9): 1423-1431.
[50] SHIBAEV A V, MURAVLEV D A, MURAVLEVA A K, et al. pH-dependent gelation of a stiff anionic polysaccharide in the presence of metal ions[J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(4): 868.
[51] CAI G J, ZHANG T, LIU S Y, et al. Stabilization mechanism and effect evaluation of stabilized silt with lignin based on laboratory data[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2016, 34(4): 331-340.
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 119
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 25
